#121
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Nice try comparing your behaviour to mine, johnny_knoxville.
Telling innocentx to fuck off in that case is not the same as winding people up. A different choice of words would have been better, but there wasn’t a single person at the time who didn’t agree he had it coming and that he had to be banned. Besides, I’m not the moderator here - Sarah is, and you will not find her telling people to fuck off.
Also, the simple fact that the thread you refer to is still online for everyone to see is enough proof we have nothing to hide, don’t you think?
I don’t need to be addressed by you first before I warn you about your behaviour. By registering for these message boards you have agreed to abide by our guidelines and Sarah and me enforcing them. If you do not feel comfortable by this, you’re free to leave. If you continue your behaviour, we’ll force you to leave.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 15:24
#122
johnny_knoxville wrote:
hoochalobster wrote:
I used the word allegedly because not one person I have
had any kind of debate with said they complaind about me…
As for not replying to you…is this thread not reply to your e-mail? Damn rude? I think not…as I addressed your
previous e-mail in a public thread too and asked you to
quote anything that could be construed as offensive from my converstion with Colin? which was banned…
You never responed…
So I have not been rude…
Teethgrinder figures it is wrong for me to respond in public, but I do my debating in here.
I have no problem that you addressed me by e-mail, and respect the reson you did so.
I will enter into one on one converstaion with you any time…
I do not need any support for anything I say, or hadn’t you noticed…
As for the groupies…I didn’t realise there was a Knoxville fan club…more a lynch mob from what I see!
Love,
Mr Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 18:43
#123
johnny_knoxville wrote:
Teethgrinder wrote:
You still haven’t mentioned the other jibes you directed at me since I never even spoke to you…
If I am guilty of breaking rules…
You are doing the same thing as me…
I rest my case!
Love,
Mr Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 18:46
#124
johnny_knoxville wrote:
mr self destruct wrote:
The thing I can’t understand is about you is, you’re presumably a T? fan, and yet you come on their message board and purposefully annoy everyone, including the moderator and Webmaster. Some fan you must be :rolleyes:
What have I said that has been so offensive???
I had mention of sprouts removed…because I inferred it was doing well on the stock exchange against the apple in Belgium…
yet…no one takes a blind bit of notice when people in here were going on about Irish people carrying semtex…
We should rename the Forum the “Johnny Knoxville Witch Trials”
Everyone gets so offended in here…
I can smell something burning…is it a pyre?
Love,
The Inoffensive Mr Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 18:58
#125
mr self destruct wrote:
You haven’t offended me…I just think you’re really irritating and a bit pathetic.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:10
#126
mrs h wrote:
JK - You seem pretty stressed, and you obviously want to have the last word, but if you’d just stop winding up the admin and post in the right threads without slagging people off then there wouldn’t even be a ‘debate’.
If people slag you off then you don’t have to turn it into a slanging match. All you have to do if you are genuinely offended by something on the boards is email the admin, same as anyone else. Whoever slags you off (or breaks the guidelines) will get a warning and that’s the end of it.
You are not going to ‘beat’ the admin by arguing with them, if /when they decide you are more trouble than you are worth they will ban you. Courtesy of the admin you still have the choice at the moment.
I can’t say it more simply than that. This post is not a dig at you, it’s just the simple facts of the matter.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:19
#127
mrs h wrote:
mr self destruct wrote:
You haven’t offended me…I just think you’re really irritating and a bit pathetic.
:rolleyes:
You’re not helping …
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:21
#128
johnny_knoxville wrote:
I am stressed…
Wouldn’t you if you were about to be burned at the stake…
I know you are not having a go…
But one minute I shouldn’t wind up…
next I shouldn’t stand my ground and talk?
I haven’t been offensive towards either of the Admin
and I aint winding up the Admin…
Just pointing out double standards…
If I am the monster they make out and people are
crying over their keyboards…put up a public information thread warning the dangers of engaging in conversation with me and how to use the ignore function…
The good Witch,
Mre Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:28
#129
johnny_knoxville wrote:
mr self destruct wrote:
You haven’t offended me…I just think you’re really irritating and a bit pathetic.
Again…
people having a go who I haven’t said a word to…
If I open my mouth there will be…
e-mails…
tears…
Threats…
…Here Be A Monster…
Love,
Mr Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:31
#130
CS (Colin S) wrote:
johnny_knoxville wrote:
yet…no one takes a blind bit of notice when people in here were going on about Irish people carrying semtex…
Please enlighten me on what you mean by this.
Also, I think all of this is stupid.
You sound like a bit of an attention seeker Mr Knoxville. You create a thread about a warning to try and spark a debate / argument / whatever you may call it. Your random threads also suggest attention seeking.
I know you’re going to go through 10 or 20 pages of threads to find a case in which I seeked attention. I’m not denying that I did seek attention when I first joined but I never do it now.
I’ve recieved 3 emails from Rene and Sarah about my conduct on the message boards, none of which have been ‘leaked’ onto here and ‘debated’ about.
johnny_knoxville wrote:
I used the word allegedly because not one person I have
had any kind of debate with said they complaind about me…
Two things..
1: Correct your grammar.
2: I may be the first to complain about you. I emailed Sarah about the argument we had in the “Calling out Therapy?” thread.
Colinx
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:40
#131
King Caffeinebomb I wrote:
hoochalobster wrote:
Is that the second or third time you’ve used the word ‘allegedly’? Why would I lie? And why would I bother emailing you if no one was annoyed by your behaviour? The short answer is: I wouldn’t.
@J_K
Just to support hoochalobster on this point - I have no problem whatsoever in letting you know that I was one of those who emailed to complain about you.
Mainly because I read a lot of your posts where you were jumping between threads and from my perspective looked like you were just trying to start a fight with whoever would rise to you. I think you’re a pillock and I’ve ignored you as I have no desire to read what you have to say.
My apologies if this full and frank confession upsets you. - please feel free to edit out any parts of this post which are not considered appropriate.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:45
#132
johnny_knoxville wrote:
Thank you for correcting my grammar…
You are not an attention seeker now…
no, of course not…
Thats why recently you posted a Thread “knoxville”,
and “Anger Management” about me…
I didn’t “leak” anything…I obviously posted it…
your point is?
Love,
Mr Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:46
#133
mrs h wrote:
johnny_knoxville wrote:
You are not going to be burned at the stake, and I wasn’t suggesting that you had personally offended the admin.
I don’t think the people who have complained are the people who you have had ‘debates’ with. There are over 2000 members of this forum, and the majority of them never post - they just want to read what’s going on. Which isn’t unreasonable.
If you stick to this thread then nobody will have a problem with where the topic goes, and people who don’t want to read it just won’t. As you so rightly say they have free choice as to what threads they look at and whose posts they read.
The problem only arises when you get personal with people on other threads that people do want to read.
If you just behave yourself and stay on topic on other threads so that everybody can read them without wading through slanging matches then I’m sure pretty much everyone will be fine with that.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:46
#134
mrs h wrote:
Colin? wrote:
Please enlighten me on what you mean by this.
Sorry Colin?, JK, Pip - any other Irish WoMbles. I’m pretty sure that was me!
It wasn’t personal though - just a historical observation that it was a preferred explosive :(
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:50
#135
johnny_knoxville wrote:
caffeinebomb wrote:
Thank you very much for learning how to use the ignore button…
though funny you should know what is happening in this thread…which was posted by none other than… ME!
Love,
Mr Knoxville
I’m a pillock???…well I’m off to e-mail Sarah on you! :p
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:50
#136
johnny_knoxville wrote:
mrs h wrote:
Sorry Colin?, JK, Pip - any other Irish WoMbles. I’m pretty sure that was me!
It wasn’t personal though - just a historical observation that it was a preferred explosive :(
I have no problem with that…
but why should my posts be banned…when what I say is not as even close to the bone???
thats why I saying it’s a witch hunt with anything I mention…
Monkies…sprouts…
Sigh…
Mr Knox-villan
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 19:58
#137
mrs h wrote:
It’s come about because you have acquired a reputation. You will just have to shake it off. I’ll just point you back to the post above that one - keep it to this thread and hopefully the problem will be solved.
@ Colin - It looked like you were starting that one, but as this is the bye bye knoxville thread and none of my business I will say no more about it.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:04
#138
CS (Colin S) wrote:
Mum ;),
I’m not the only one that started it, and, I was only stating my point.
Colinx
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:13
#139
mrs h wrote:
You did just butt in and start chucking accusations about for no obvious reason. Which is fine, as long as you don’t get all huffy if he does it back to you …
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:16
#140
CS (Colin S) wrote:
I can take it back. :)
Colinx
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:18
#141
johnny_knoxville wrote:
Colin?
Sir Colin?, to you.
Registered: Dec. 2005
Posts: 2867
Anger management
Not trying to be funny or anything, but some of you may have realised the various disagreements I’ve had with johnny_knoxville and Suz since they joined the board.
I agreed to keep my mouth shut in return that they wouldn’t have cheap go’s at me for little to no reason whatsoever.
The latest example is this:
Originally posted by johnny_knoxville:
ok…
since an invasion of cock gobblins has caused another thread to be taken down…
For those unaware, he is referring to the thread that was in General T?opics about collecting and collectors, started by Suz.
And I am assuming that I am the “cock gobblin” because since I joined in on the thread it was closed swiftly.
I quoted Souldoubt in a reply, and Suz randomly tried to start an argument with myself.
The argument dragged on a bit and I made a post saying that I would say no more on the matter. The thread was deleted.
Then, knoxville creates a chillpill thread, in which I took the quote from, most likely trying to annoy me.
Those that were on the boards when I first joined know that I’m a pretty decent person, and I like a bit of banter / craic and I enjoy joining in on discussions.
Although I think this is just a step too far and both myself and knoxville have previously been warned about our behaviour on the boards.
Not trying to pin the blame on anyone here, but I have tried to be more mature but I constantly read posts that are shallow minded and in some cases abusive towards other members.
Being referred to as a Cock Gobblin isn’t the nicest thing in the world, and there was something in the Collector’s thread about people who collect various T? items being sad or having more money than sense.
Like I’ve previously said, I’m not trying to have a go at anyone, and, yes, I have lost my temper on two or three occassions, but none of us should read a lot of crap on these boards.
Fair discussion & banter: OK
Insulting & a general prat: Not OK.
Colinx
There you go Colin I just posted that so you don’t have to waste time e-mailing Sarah or crying in a Thread dedicated to me…
Love,
Knoxville
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:21
#142
not_that_kind_of_guy (a story on the radio) wrote:
can we stop this? it’s getting a bit silly now.
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:28
#143
johnny_knoxville wrote:
silly…
I agree…
Mr Knox-villan
Posted on Sun, 18 March 2007 at 20:31
#144
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
Comments removed by Hooch
Love
your friend
Pip
Sorry Hooch 4 you having the bother to take this this down
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 01:58
#145
KJC Dublin (Karl) wrote:
Oh yes,
Real proof that you master the ignore function - it helped you ignore this thread.
Bearing that in mind, no that it will be long before that post is removed, talk about making an absolute tool of yourself. I bear no grudge against you, but c’mon?
As for the comment above regarding Irish bashing, I agree that there has been far too much that has gone unpunished.
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 08:23
#146
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
johnny_knoxville wrote:
You still haven’t mentioned the other jibes you directed at me since I never even spoke to you…
Yes, I did:
Teethgrinder wrote:
I don’t need to be addressed by you first before I warn you about your behaviour. By registering for these message boards you have agreed to abide by our guidelines and Sarah and me enforcing them.
I’m done debating with you. You’d be wise to follow the friendly suggestions of mrs h, as she’s hitting the nail on the head.
Pip, consider this an official warning for violating the guidelines. Continue and you too may face your membership being revoked.
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 08:33
#147
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 11:01
#148
buffalo-boy wrote:
Oh my God there’s 8 pages of it now! Some people out there are loving this!
Not me tho! :D
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 14:58
#149
johnny_knoxville wrote:
Thats grand Teethgrinder…
I have made my view’s crystal & pointed out what I consider double standards…
as Will Ferrell said in Ancorman:
I wanna say something.
I’m gonna put it out there.
If you like it,
you can take it.
If you don’t,
send it right back.
Love,
Mr. Knoxville
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 15:44
#150
Dermot (The Derm) wrote:
Wait. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. I… I wanna be on you.
Posted on Mon, 19 March 2007 at 15:48
