#511
Taz94 (Tessa) wrote:
And thanks for correcting my quote, but what did i do wrong?
Posted on Mon, 8 October 2007 at 15:19
#512
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
The code at the end of the quote was missing a forward slash, like this: [/quote]
Posted on Mon, 8 October 2007 at 15:22
#513
soul doubt (an) wrote:
Thanks for bringing back the “mark as read” feature, as I don’t read all the chit chat topics, they all stayed new/updated.
Posted on Mon, 8 October 2007 at 17:19
#514
Ci? wrote:
I love the new WoM but René any chance of getting an angrier looking >:-< ???
it doesn’t look nearly cross enough for my liking!!
Posted on Mon, 8 October 2007 at 21:04
#515
mrs h wrote:
It doesn’t, does it? It just looks a bit sulky …
I like the MSN one best. With the teeth.
Posted on Tue, 9 October 2007 at 10:39
#516
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Only because it makes you feel nostalgic for when you still used to have your own. :p
Posted on Tue, 9 October 2007 at 10:40
#517
Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:
I agree - the red MSN ” :@ ” icon would work well.
Posted on Tue, 9 October 2007 at 13:27
#518
mr self destruct wrote:
Preferred it when members online were listed on the discussions page!
Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 11:46
#519
mrs h wrote:
Rene - what do we do if we want to search for strings? I tried putting a phrase in double quotes and in single quotes, but it just ands the words together and doesn’t search for the actual phrase. Is there a way of doing it? If not, can you make there be a way of doing it?
Posted on Mon, 15 October 2007 at 17:19
#520
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
*giggles at silly smum, looking for bits of twine*
Posted on Mon, 15 October 2007 at 21:15
#521
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Ci?, I’m happy to give it a try at some point, but doing any work on the smilies is not a priority for me right now.
mrs h, we currently use a thing called natural language search which doesn’t search for exact phrases when you add quotes around them. Searching for exact phrases is one of the planned improvements to the search feature. I am, however, currently working on a different project (not related to Therapy?/WoM), so there won’t be any updates to the boards for a while.
Posted on Wed, 17 October 2007 at 10:49
#522
mrs h wrote:
Are you trying for a baby? :D
Posted on Wed, 17 October 2007 at 11:13
#523
Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:
Please can we have a more angry :mad: Please Please Please
Posted on Wed, 17 October 2007 at 21:07
#524
Ci? wrote:
Thanks René…don’t worry there’ll be no tantrums if it doesn’t get done soon…i know in the grand scheme of things it’s nothing!
Posted on Wed, 17 October 2007 at 22:22
#525
mrs h wrote:
Rene, what has happened to all the times? The WoM is slow :(
Posted on Thu, 13 December 2007 at 17:38
#526
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Posted on Thu, 13 December 2007 at 17:49
#527
mrs h wrote:
Posted on Thu, 13 December 2007 at 18:44
#528
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Folks, it is now possible to search within a single discussion. If you’re reading a discussion the search box is automatically set to only search posts in that discussion.
Earlier in the week I made some changes to the menu and navigation, and relocated the search box. Please let me know if there’s anything unclear or not working properly.
Finally, I’ve turned DST off in everyone’s account.
Posted on Thu, 20 December 2007 at 08:49
#529
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
mr self destruct wrote:
Preferred it when members online were listed on the discussions page!
yep, im with you there
Posted on Thu, 20 December 2007 at 10:21 in reply to an earlier post
#530
mrs h wrote:
Rene, if you ever come back I’ve just noticed that if you search a discussion then the ‘next’ and ‘previous’ links don’t work on the results. Although in fairness I’m probably the only person that ever does that! :)
Posted on Sat, 22 March 2008 at 18:09
#531
mrs h wrote:
Rene, if you ever come back the clocks have gone wonky again. It’s 1.30 am, but the posts are showing up as an hour earlier.
Where are you anyway? :(
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 00:32
#532
Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:
For the Love of God Bring Back the Edit Function ! :-/
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 13:17
#533
butters (mikey) wrote:
*cough* signatures *cough*
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 13:19
#534
Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:
Hell Yes. I remember signatures. They were a right laugh. During that whole quote - a - post Fad a while back. Ah. Memories . 
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 22:09
#535
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (I would set Myself On Fire For You) wrote:
till people took it too far with massivly long sigs, and we got a restraing order put on length
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 22:13
#536
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
i remember signature too, they were runners up in britains got talent :D:D
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 22:39
#537
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (I would set Myself On Fire For You) wrote:
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 22:59
#538
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 23:01
#539
butters (mikey) wrote:
unfortunately i do too
sweet jesus graeme, its only been like 2 days…it still hurts…they should have won, dont bring it up anymore
Posted on Mon, 2 June 2008 at 23:17
