Buy our new album “A Brief Crack Of Light” on CD or limited edition vinyl at Amazon.co.uk, or direct from Global Music

Radiohead - In Rainbows

#

Started by Dermot in Other Bands & Artists

Anyone “bought” this yet?

http://www.inrainbows.com/

I tried to pay £3 but they kept rejecting my card, saying my bank wouldn’t authorise it - so I ended up just paying nothing :o

Can’t wait to hear it when I get in :)

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 14:35

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 71 by 21 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:

I’m waiting for it to come down in price

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 14:49

#2

Dermot wrote:

That automatic funny setting is really working out for you! :D

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 14:54

#3

Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:

;)

The dude on the BBC website was quite scathing about the Radiohead album, actually. Said it was more of the same, as if they’re stuck in a rut, and that bypassing the record companies was all well and good for established bands but that it actually threatens the future of new bands, if money for investment isn’t there.

Hmmm, could be quite a contentious issue, this “pay whatever you like” thing.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 14:58

#4

Dermot wrote:

I saw that review too. He said his favourite album by them was Pablo Honey though - says it all really :o

Personally, I think it’s a good thing - but we shall see

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 15:06

#5

Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:

Yeah, does kind of give it away when he mentions Pablo Honey, though I will give myself away by saying that it’s a toss up between that and the Bends for me too.

never really got the later stuff, except maybe for wossname, thingy…buggerit…oh yeah, No Surprises.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 15:10

#6

Dermot wrote:

Ah well, y’see my favourite album is Kid A… giving myself away as being pretentious here ;) Oh well, someone has to :D Thought Thom Yorke’s solo album was great too.

I’m not a massive fan or anything but am always interested in what they’re doing. Them and Morrissey would probably be the 2 acts I’ve never seen live that I would really like to.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 15:14

#7

g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:

This new album sucks big time

good job i payed £0.00 for it to be fair

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 16:29

#8

Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:

I don’t think you can really make a fair judgement of an album after such a short time, dude, give it a chance, at least!

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 16:31

#9

g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:

Ive listened to it about 5 times already.

and i hate it

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 16:47

#10

Gav wrote:

Stop listening to it then!

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 16:50

#11

g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:

ive been trying to give it a chance

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 16:54

#12

CS (Colin S) wrote:

Never really heard Radiohead’s stuff *ducks from flying bricks* and will download and pay nothing.
If I like it, I will then pay £5 for it…

If the website works, that is..

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 18:22

#13

Superunknown wrote:

I haven’t even heard of this. Funny thing is I started listening to Radiohead again only last week and I was wondering what took them so long to come up with a new album.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 18:36

#14

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

Pablo Honey is their best album :p I haven’t actually bothered to listen to anything since OK Computer, really went off them. Am I to assume that it would be a waste of 0p to download this? I don’t think I’d feel right getting it for free anyhow so I’d have to pay and then I’d be annoyed if it was crap. Are you allowed to make a donation afterwards, based on how highly you rate it? Much better plan.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 18:57

#15

Squall wrote:

I reckon it wont be worth 0p. I cant even download it at the moment.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 19:02

#16

EclipseDeLarge wrote:

It’s really not that bad. I only heard a sneeky intro to one song off a friend and it had a kickass bass line. Definetly worth more than 0p.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 21:06

#17

Squall wrote:

Oh dear god…its actually worse than i expected.

Posted on Wed, 10 October 2007 at 21:32

#18

Auto_Surgery (Andy) wrote:

Is it true it’s all instrumentals with no lyrics?

I’m not sure what exactly happened to RH after OK Computer, this is where they lost me and I’m guessing this new release will continue to loose me

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 08:06

#19

msd wrote:

Tight fuckers who’ve downloaded it for free…

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 08:08

#20

Dermot wrote:

My bus to work didn’t turn up this morning so I was half an hour late which was bad. But the silver lining is that I got to listen to this twice through :) Favourite song is probably ‘Nude’. I’d say it’s worth a pound or 2

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 08:25

#21

msd wrote:

I would have paid a couple of quid less if I’d known it was only encoded at 160 bits…that’s lousy!

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 09:05

#22

Gav wrote:

Just get it off a torrents web site :D

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 11:18

#23

msd wrote:

Yeah - it defeats the whole purpose of this experiment, but if I’m going to pay for downloadable albums in the future they’d better start releasing them at a higher bitrate, 160 isn’t acceptable.

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 11:39

#24

Squall wrote:

I doubt a higher bit rate would make it any more listenable. I think it might actually be WORSE than amnesiac ! :eek:

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 16:09

#25

Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:

^ lol

I must admit, they lost me with Pyramid Song, which is just the sound of a band being difficult for the sake of it.

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 16:20

#26

Squall wrote:

I loved the Bends…every time John Peel ( RIP ) played a song off it - i knew I had to have it. Then OK Computer came out, and that was a real let down at the time, it came out the same year as Be Here Now, and for my money, I was 18 at the time, it was summer and I wanted to listen to upbeat rock and roll rather than miserable difficult music. Of course, 10 years later i’m not huge on either of those albums. Kid A was alright as a one off - had some nice tunes and was interesting…but then Amnesiac was more of the same - but worse !!! Hail to the thief was supposed to be Ok Computer part 2 according to the band themselves but still contained annoying noise tracks with crap lyrics and vocals…4 years later - they bring this…No Wonder They Let You Download It For Free ! :D

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 16:45

#27

msd wrote:

I listened to it a couple of times today and I liked it…a few of the tracks were great.

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 18:55

#28

Squall wrote:

Not really what you want after 4 years is it ? A “few” of the tracks were great.

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 19:14

#29

msd wrote:

I’ve only listened to it twice.

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 19:23

#30

Squall wrote:

Its hardly good enough since this is the same band that released “The Bends” and ” Ok Computer “

Posted on Thu, 11 October 2007 at 19:42

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 71 by 21 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.