#1
ChrisDavies wrote:
A bit samey if it is. It could be a decent stencil for a future gemil tattoo that I might get , the only other decent sized one is the one in the Nurse booklet.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:16
#2
Alan wrote:
Ha! It looks like young Jonah Ramone Cairns has had his art-set out!!
Seriously though, it’s about time they gave Gemil his own album cover. Although, it does seem rather cheap, like a bootleg or something. Still, to anyone who hasn’t been exposed to Gemil much, it looks fairly cool, I suppose.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:16
#3
opal_mantra (Holly) wrote:
don’t think so..there’s nothing on the global website..or on here…
i hope it’s abit more exciting than that
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:16
#4
g (My Shade Will Comfort you) wrote:
I like it, kind of like therapy?’s black album.
im going to be the first to nickname crooked timber the gemil album
thats on the basis this is real.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:32
#5
Squall wrote:
Even if its fake - its better than the OCFA cover. I really liked the High Anxiety and Never Apologise covers but was really dissapointed with the one cure cover. I actually wouldnt mind this. Its simplistic and looks neat and catchy :)
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:37
#6
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
How can a cover look “catchy” charles? :)
I still feel funny in the eyes whilst looking at the OCFA cover.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:39
#7
ChrisDavies wrote:
Plus it’s probably saved the band or record company money. To be honest the same people are gonna buy this album that bought the last one , so the album art isn’t that important. Then again it could be a smart move , if I didn’t know T? and saw that cover in a shop i’d be interested in listeneing to it. If it’s real…
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:43
#8
Squall wrote:
^ ^ I meant as in eye -catching :p
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:44
#9
Squall wrote:
It’s about time Gemil got his own cover.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 19:46
#10
RoyBatty (Steve) wrote:
It is kind of normal looking for a T? cover, isn’t it? Where are the bad teeth, fake mustaches and ghoulish faces? ;-)
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 20:42
#11
buffalo-boy wrote:
They are on the inside of the CD booklet haha!
No, I really like it - its the best move they could go for, something recognisable as T? straightaway. No nonsense, good choice dudes!
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 20:49
#12
Ronald wrote:
Well, if that is the cover I’d like it a lot, it would be a nice present for Gemils 20th birthday wouldn’t it, and I like that lettertype too, plain and simple…
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 20:55
#13
Auto_Surgery (Andy) wrote:
I for one actually think it looks pretty cool - Plain and simple. Far to many bands that have been around as long as T? over think things and get very distorted. I think more than anything fans that have lost touch are more likely to see this and think “Wow T? are still around…”
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 21:10
#14
chr1s (I can't remember my own name) wrote:
it is the new cover…and i like it :)
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 21:15
#15
Squall wrote:
Very cool i think.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 22:11
#16
Taunty Dan wrote:
very very bad. Oh dear dear me…
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 22:34
#17
g (My Shade Will Comfort you) wrote:
maybe its an artistic stand abot not judging a book by its cover?
and in this day and age (the day of download) as much as I hate to admit it album artwork doesnt have as much importance as it used to.
I personally like it, its simplicity will stand out on cd racks next to all the complex designs.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 22:36
#18
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
ah i assume this is a joke because it looks pants. T? have some average lp covers but that just screams bargin bin. Anton Corbijn it ain’t.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 22:59
#19
Squall wrote:
Well I like it. :mad:
i think its better than OCFA. At least everything is central now and not all over the shop.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:03
#20
g (My Shade Will Comfort you) wrote:
The albums not even out yet and people have found something to complain about.
the internet makes minor things seem important due to the vocal minority and their criticism
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:10
#21
Dermot wrote:
I think it looks alright… but I’d be surprised if it’s the official new cover
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:15
#22
Squall wrote:
Just look at You Tube. People go apeshit over videos that they dont even care about.
Its like those clever people who phone up voting lines to say they dont care. .
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:15
#23
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
ya i have found something to complain about. artwork is important in my view, it may not be to you but it is to some of us. when i was younger i would have said fuck all and towed the fanboy line but those days are gone along with my youth and boyish good looks
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:17
#24
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
Charlie wrote:
Just look at You Tube. People go apeshit over videos that they dont even care about.
Its like those clever people who phone up voting lines to say they dont care. .
i don’t do either of those thing. what your point?
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:18 in reply to an earlier post
#25
Squall wrote:
Geez. calm down will you :mad: it was a reply to Gimme.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:21
#26
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
stop with the rolling eyes thing, its annoying.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:25
#27
Squall wrote:
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:26
#28
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:32
#29
Squall wrote:
What if this was Therapy?’s black album ? An album that goes on to sell 20 million copies ?
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:34
#30
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
well then they’ll have sold 20 million copies of an album with a shit cover.
Posted on Tue, 13 January 2009 at 23:40
