Buy our new album “A Brief Crack Of Light” on CD or limited edition vinyl at Amazon.co.uk, or direct from Global Music

John Leslie Sex Charges Dropped

#

Started by Bad Karma

ALL charges against TV presenter John Leslie have been dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service.

The 38-year-old former host of ITV’s This Morning was told the news during a hearing at London’s Southwark Crown Court.

Leslie, who has always maintained his innocence, had been accused of attacking the same woman twice between May 25 and May 28, 1997.

But the charges were dropped after the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to offer any evidence against him.

The prosecution offered no evidence against Mr Leslie saying it had “come into possession of further material that has led to the charges against the defendant being reviewed.”

“The prosecution gladly acknowledges that he will leave this court without a stain on his character from this investigation,” the CPS lawyer added.

Posted on Thu, 31 July 2003 at 10:09

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 104 by 9 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

dano wrote:

This whole story raises some serious issues, it reminded me a bit in places of the Craig Charles ” Sex pestering” story.

For one thing I don’t think it’s right that somebody who is accused of a crime should be named in public, I know that he was accidentally “outed” on the Wright Stuff ( although I recall a journalist criticising Wright as they claimed this wasn’t the first time he’d done something like this in order to further his own career ), but I don’t think that if somebody is accused of something they should have their name divulged…mud sticks!

The whole story didn’t really portray the women accusing him of sex pestering in a good light..in fact it made them sound thick, basically it seemed to consist of ” John Leslie bought me drinks all night and when he invited me to his room I went…and then he expected sex” ( I know that this wasn’t the same with all the women who came forward, but certainly seemed true of the higher profile ones ).

The “unsavoury nature” of John Leslie verged on the ridiculous, so he took drugs and boasted of bedding loads of women..big deal, if any guy was honest and was in a similar high profile postition I reckon he’d do the same.. I know I would! This is the kind of behaviour the press celebrate rock stars for! Although I don’t think I’d knob Ulrika…

Speaking of her, I think that basically what she’s done is well out of order, apparently she blew her top at a journalist the other day saying that she hadn’t done anything and that people should leave her alone..what a cow! She was quite happy of all the attention when she had a book to sell.

On a final note, I thought he was long overdue a fall- although not quite on that level- he’s always struck me as being a smug bastard anyway, but I wouldn’t wish something like that on my worst enemy. I wonder if he tried sex pestering Fern Britten?

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 01:00

#2

Bad Karma wrote:

His case does raise a lot of questions about the british legal system,remember the disgraced Tory MP Neil Hamilton and his wife they were both falsely accused of sexual crimes as well.Should someone accused of a sexual crime been ganted anonymity until they are proven guilty?.Like you said mud sticks and i think the stigma of being accused will always be there.I haven’t heard the news today so far but i wonder if Leslie will take legal action against his the women and/or Matthew Wright?I’m sure Leslie will have a book out before christmas him and his agent will find a way to cash in on this situation.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 10:07

#3

White Psycho wrote:

dano wrote:

This whole story raises some serious issues, it reminded me a bit in places of the Craig Charles ” Sex pestering” story.

He was damn lucky to get his career back after that!!

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 10:12

#4

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

I think Channel 5 are indeed being sued over Matthew Wright’s faux pas. I’m not sure that he did it on purpose, if he did then he has certainly mastered the faking of an ‘oh shit, I just really fucked up’ face cause he just went death white after he said it. And since all he’s done (in all likelyhood) is cost his bosses a lot of cash I’m not sure it would improve his career, other than I suppose the theory of ‘all publicity is good publicity’ and he’s more well known now.

I do think that all people accused of a crime (not necessarily just sex ones) should have the same right to anonymity as the alleged victim until they have been proven guilty. What the CPS guy said about Leslie, “he will leave this court without a stain on his character from this investigation”, is crap - people aren’t going to forget what’s happened and there’ll always be those who have doubts about him from now on.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 12:16

#5

Bad Karma wrote:

hoochalobster wrote:

people aren’t going to forget what’s happened and there’ll always be those who have doubts about him from now on.

Yeah people are always going to thinking maybe he was guilty.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 13:01

#6

Bad Karma wrote:

White Psycho wrote:

He was damn lucky to get his career back after that!!

Craig Charles was very lucky that Robot Wars show seems to be a hit i watched it once but i didn’t really like it.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 13:03

#7

White Psycho wrote:

Bad Karma wrote:

Craig Charles was very lucky that Robot Wars show seems to be a hit i watched it once but i didn’t really like it.

He also did another 3 series of Red Dwarf, which is what I’m more bothered about :D

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 18:22

#8

Bad Karma wrote:

I like Red Dwarf i haven’t seen it in years,are they making anymore of it?There was talk of making a movie once.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 18:25

#9

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

Early Red Dwarf was great, it got a bit shit towards the end though - I think they should have stopped making it a lot sooner and gone out on a high.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 20:29

#10

White Psycho wrote:

Bad Karma wrote:

I like Red Dwarf i haven’t seen it in years,are they making anymore of it?There was talk of making a movie once.

Far as I know they’re making it still

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 20:36

#11

msd wrote:

From the John Leslie case to Red Dwarf in 7 posts :)

Back on topic, I think it’s disgraceful what happened to JL, and he deserves to sue the asses off every guilty party. The man nearly topped himself for Christ’s sake…

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 20:56

#12

msd wrote:

@ Dano - I reckon he tried it on with that Agony Aunt woman from Newcastle :p

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 20:59

#13

White Psycho wrote:

mr self destruct wrote:

From the John Leslie case to Red Dwarf in 7 posts :)

What do you expect? :D

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 21:20

#14

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

Gah! I always just go to the latest post and I didn’t even realise I was in the John Leslie thread. *writes new guideline* “Community Leaders are excluded from having to stay on topic and immediately forgiven if they do”. There ;)

Back to JL - I agree with Sam, it totally sucks what happened and the state he was in when he made the press statement was terrible. Certain people (naming no names Matthew Wright) have a lot to answer for.

Posted on Sat, 2 August 2003 at 21:44

#15

Bad Karma wrote:

mr self destruct wrote:

From the John Leslie case to Red Dwarf in 7 posts :)

Hey we always do go off topic lol

Now back to Leslie i’m just wondering how do you cope with all the stress and worry that your friends,family the people you work with and the general public all think you might be a sex offender?

Posted on Sun, 3 August 2003 at 10:21

#16

Bad Karma wrote:

mr self destruct wrote:

@ Dano - I reckon he tried it on with that Agony Aunt woman from Newcastle :p

For a moment i thought this read Dano tried it on with that Agony Aunt from Newcastle :p

Posted on Sun, 3 August 2003 at 10:23

#17

Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:

Red Dwarf should be in production, but things keep faltering - money issues, Chris Barrie filming Tomb Raider II etc. I believe that the intention is still for the movie to come out at some time, but I think that interest will fade if they leave it too long.

John Leslie (and Craig Charles) should have had anonymity - whilst the full facts of their situations are clouded to say the least, the Hamilton’s case clearly shows that this would be a good thing and that the current situation assumes that the victim is whoever is making the claim - not a terribly just position.

However, the media blitz on Mr Leslie post the dropping of charges will hopefully help him rebuild things - I wouldn’t be surprised if, financially at least, he emerges better off from the whole thing.

I’m back btw. ;)

Posted on Sun, 3 August 2003 at 14:22

#18

Bad Karma wrote:

Citizen Erased wrote:

However, the media blitz on Mr Leslie post the dropping of charges will hopefully help him rebuild things - I wouldn’t be surprised if, financially at least, he emerges better off from the whole thing.

I’m back btw. ;)

I think it would very hard to rebuild your life if you are an ordinary member of the public,because there would be no media blitz and those false allegations could haunt you for the rest of your life.

Posted on Sun, 3 August 2003 at 16:22

#19

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

Citizen Erased wrote:

Chris Barrie filming Tomb Raider II etc.

How could he stoop so low?

Posted on Tue, 5 August 2003 at 22:03

#20

Bad Karma wrote:

He was in the first one as well,i haven’t seen it but i read he plays Lara Crofts butler.

Posted on Tue, 5 August 2003 at 22:05

#21

dano wrote:

It’s highly unlikely at present that the Red Dwarf movie will go ahead, there’s a stage in Shepperton where all the props and sets are currently stored, and they’re all taken from a low budget brit sci-fi flick. Robert Llewelyn has had a life cast taken from him for the new Kryten suit, but given his past history ( the effects guys kept having to expand the suit by an inch every season due to his reputation for partying ) they’ll probably have to start again if they ever get around to it..which seems quite unlikely at present!

Posted on Wed, 6 August 2003 at 18:35

#22

carrie wrote:

On the subject of John Lesley I must admit i find it hard to believe that he has not done anything ( a personal statement due to the fact he comes accross as a total prat and a bit of a perve), BUT as highlighted in other posts it is supposed to be innocent until proved guilty there are too many situations where peoples lives and familys lives have been made hell due to faulse alligations, especially on sex offences. There was a teacher in my home town who was accussed by a pupil of doing “bad things to him” it was only in the local newspaper and local tv but his house got attacked with his children in it and wife, he ended up trying to commit suicide.It ended up the kid had made it all up and had to carry on with it because if the pressure, he will never be able to get over it the record will always been there (and there will always be people who are not convinced if he did or did not (like me on john lesley)

There should be something done about it and I have felt this way for ages. I do agree the public have the right to know what is going on, but I think the media like to make things up to rock the apple cart,and mess peoples lives up. There should be more strict controle on the infomation given by the media and what they are allowed to publish ( they can bleet on about the rights all they like but turn the tables on them and i am damn sure they would not like it)

Posted on Thu, 7 August 2003 at 10:37

#23

dano wrote:

Going back to the Craig Charles case, it was later admitted very publicly ( i.e- she sold the story to a newspaper ) that the “victim” had made the story up to make some money and further her modelling career. So Craig Charles lost 9 months of his life and very nearly his career because some woman decided to take advantage of the fact that she was his “friend”

The woman got a very nice wad of cash for selling the story to the paper, is this really a fair justice system?

Posted on Thu, 7 August 2003 at 23:02

#24

forge_88 wrote:

Slighty off target, a girl at my work place, slept with Beppe from eastenders, whilst on holiday and tried to sell that to the Sun newspaper for £10,000, it fell through as one Beppe denied it (although their were photos) and second no one really cared. The media play these things up and love wrecking careers, however we live in a society where we love to see succesful people fail, and generally always support the underdog until they are on top, which is why these story’s attract such media hype because other peoples misfortune sells.

Posted on Thu, 7 August 2003 at 23:18

#25

dano wrote:

I have to say that although the man gets on my nerves completely, I can’t blame John Leslie for what he’s currently doing by telling and selling his story to anybody and everybody who will listen..better yet..pay to listen. To look at it in a cold matter of fact way..he’s making up for lost revenue!

We’re all human, we all make mistakes..god knows, I’ve made enough of my own! But to have every single error scrutinised in public must be horrible..that said, if you put yourself out there in the public eye in the first place, I can see how people consider you to be an open target.

The irony of it all is that John Leslie will be forever portrayed as the victim- he has now become a household name, this will eventually make him an even bigger celebrity than he would ever have become.

Why do people find Ulrika attractive anyway? I always thought she was a bit of an overrated minger!

Posted on Thu, 7 August 2003 at 23:28

#26

Bad Karma wrote:

dano wrote:

Why do people find Ulrika attractive anyway? I always thought she was a bit of an overrated minger!

I don’t find her attractive either.

Posted on Fri, 8 August 2003 at 12:00

#27

Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:

Bad Karma wrote:

I don’t find her attractive either.

Nor me. My mate’s mate shagged Lauren from Neighbours though.

Posted on Fri, 8 August 2003 at 19:53

#28

dano wrote:

Which one was that? ( The one from neighbours I mean, not your mate )

Posted on Sat, 9 August 2003 at 19:17

#29

White Psycho wrote:

This is just disturbing, you’ve moved from sex offenders to shagging the cast of Neighbours! :p

Posted on Sat, 9 August 2003 at 19:23

#30

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

Title: what does topic mean?

Lauren was Lou’s daughter, I can’t really remember her that well but I think she liked horseriding and probably moved to Queensland cause that’s what everyone does when they leave Neighbours. Except Dee, cause she’s going to die :(

Posted on Sat, 9 August 2003 at 22:07

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 104 by 9 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.