#121
romy wrote:
Jimmy_Ska2001 wrote:
But it just seemed that Grant had a desire to be popular, which isn’t a bad thing, but they drifted away from that sound that first caught me (and Taka cut his horns off!).
but they are still down-to-earth guys. and taka is cool as fuck :D
Posted on Wed, 12 October 2005 at 20:29
#122
romy wrote:
has anyone listened to the new single yet?
i think it’s brilliant, as close as they can get to early feeder nowadays.
opinions?
Posted on Wed, 8 March 2006 at 12:47
#123
buffalo-boy wrote:
I like Feeder, apart from their newer stuff and i’m worried - that is a crap title! Even worse than Tumble and fall. Eugh!
Posted on Wed, 8 March 2006 at 15:44
#124
Taunty Dan wrote:
they just don’t do it for me, i honestly don’t know how homegrown bands like that sell so much when bands like Spiritualized are virtually ignored.
Posted on Wed, 8 March 2006 at 15:57
#125
buffalo-boy wrote:
I love Polythene and Yesterday Went Too Soon. Echo Park was good but very poppy and produced and Comfort In Sound was just boring with 4 amazing songs on it.
Well done for going over well to the Download crowd last year!! I was down the front!
Posted on Mon, 13 March 2006 at 13:37
#126
hrno28 wrote:
Title: Any of you guys Feeder fans???? (merged)
Feeder are preety cool. I live in Australia where them, like Therapy?, are preety much not heard off. How big are Feeder in UK and US and europe…their early stuff is preety heavy
Posted on Wed, 15 March 2006 at 04:32
#127
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
hrno28 wrote:
How big are Feeder in UK and US and europe…their early stuff is pretty heavy
:eek:Heavy feeder where NEVER EVER in anywayheavy there pretty big in the UK but are probbaly unheard of in the States
Posted on Wed, 15 March 2006 at 16:43
#128
buffalo-boy wrote:
They have some pretty rockin’ moments pip - Stereo World, Waiting For Changes, Tangerine and a few more but i’ll have to listen to them again - its been a while!! I do think GN is a great songwriter, i just kind of wish he’d stop doing that Beatles crossed with Oasis chord sequences style of songwriting and crank the distortion up occasionally! :)
Posted on Thu, 16 March 2006 at 08:26
#129
romy wrote:
there’s nowt better than those 8-minute live versions of descend, people :D
Posted on Sat, 18 March 2006 at 17:47
#130
hrno28 wrote:
Title: Feeder (merged)
who is a fan? i think their early stuff like polythene was heavy in a way. The vocals were very wobbly in terms of being in tune their too. But that dude is an awesome vocalsist…these lads are great, but, sorry boys, can’t match it with Therapy?!!!
anyone dig Feeder???
Posted on Sat, 20 May 2006 at 03:27
#131
Charlie wrote:
Lost and Found has a riff that is pretty much ” Two Timing Touch ” by The Hives.
Gotta love The Hives :D
Posted on Sat, 20 May 2006 at 09:19
#132
Taunty Dan wrote:
feeder do nothing for me. Their tunes are kinda in one ear out the other. Not bad, just…not memorable.
Posted on Sat, 20 May 2006 at 12:25
#133
Punkwak (Tijn) wrote:
my favo song is insomnia..! Rocks big time.. :D
can’t stop jumping after the first riff.. :rolleyes:
cheers
Posted on Sat, 20 May 2006 at 21:34
#134
Punkwak (Tijn) wrote:
my favo song is insomnia..! Rocks big time.. :D
can’t stop jumping after the first riff.. :rolleyes:
Buck rogers is by the way the best repeating vocals i’ve ever heard in my life..!!!
Player, player, player, player.. cd or dvd i think haha
cheers
Posted on Sat, 20 May 2006 at 21:36
#135
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
fucking love feeder!!! swim and polythene r the best ones!!
Posted on Sun, 21 May 2006 at 00:23
#136
Andy D (Andy) wrote:
Favourite songs:
Turn
Just A Day
Stereo World
Descend
7 Days In The Sun
Posted on Sun, 21 May 2006 at 00:29
#137
CS (Colin S) wrote:
I like Feeder :)
Am I strange for liking them? :(
Posted on Sun, 21 May 2006 at 16:48
#138
Idlevice2 wrote:
Posted on Sun, 21 May 2006 at 17:10
#139
buffalo-boy wrote:
There is already a Feeder thread on here somewhere but never mind.
Has anyone seen the Singles CD thats just been released? Absolutely NO singles from the first album!
Grant Nicholas, I am not happy since it was people like me buying Stereo World and My Perfect Day that got you where you are today so you can release gloopy ballads! Traitor!
Posted on Mon, 22 May 2006 at 07:31
#140
Charlie wrote:
Tangerine fucking rocks too.
Posted on Mon, 22 May 2006 at 11:29
#141
romy wrote:
buffalo-boy wrote:
Has anyone seen the Singles CD thats just been released? Absolutely NO singles from the first album!
at least the DVD has all the videos on. haven’t watched it yet though.
oh,and while you all went to see tpy? i went to see feeder in munich and hamburg. munich fucking rocked :D
Posted on Mon, 22 May 2006 at 18:47
#142
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
no singles from ‘swim’ but 2 from ’ polythene’ which are ‘high’ and ‘suffocate’
but where are ‘tangerine’ ‘stereo world’ ‘sweet 16’ ‘crash’ ‘cement’ ‘paperfaces’ ‘day in day out’?!?!
their earlier stuff is way better, dont get me wrong i love the nu stuff, but the earlier stuff were headbangers! (well some of them anyways)
tip for ya all in case u didnt hear it: ‘here in the bubble’ their b-side back in the polythene days its awesome a heavy ballad, its brilliant, a reminder of how feeder rocked back in the days.
Posted on Mon, 22 May 2006 at 21:45
#143
buffalo-boy wrote:
Exactly! They are great summer music tho, as soon as we get some i’nm gonna get the stereo outside and blast a bit of Polythene!
And i’m glad that nice guys like them still get space in Kerrap! which is all but a joke these days. :)
Posted on Tue, 23 May 2006 at 07:21
#144
romy wrote:
Graeme55? wrote:
no singles from ‘swim’ but 2 from ’ polythene’ which are ‘high’ and ‘suffocate’
but where are ‘tangerine’ ‘stereo world’ ‘sweet 16’ ‘crash’ ‘cement’ ‘paperfaces’ ‘day in day out’?!?!
that really is a good question. and the shite songs like tumble and fall and forget about tomorrow were put on the record. no fair.
Quote (author unknown):
their earlier stuff is way better, dont get me wrong i love the nu stuff, but the earlier stuff were headbangers! (well some of them anyways)
those were the days…at least they spice up most of the songs live (thanks to mark and dean) and make even the bad ones bearable.
Posted on Tue, 23 May 2006 at 11:22
#145
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
i heard that they might go back to the heavy stuff on the new album, id be extremely surprised if that beats their first 2 albums. they r ace.
Posted on Tue, 23 May 2006 at 23:58
#146
romy wrote:
grantley has said the same before they made pushing the senses and look how many heavy songs are on it :p
i dunno - i mean, the new songs on the singles album have a heavy edge to them, but are far too polished for my liking. even though this time it’s not gil norton who produced them, but stephen street.
i’d say, do a YWTS again and do it yourselves. but who’d listen to me anyway :rolleyes:
anyway, good to see that at least Mark listened to me in munich, because i told him there that tpy? are playing the same venues at cirtually the same time (taken from the tour diary on feederweb): ;)
Quote (author unknown):
After food, some of us go to see Therapy? who’re playing at the prime club tonight. They play great and I enjoy the songs from Troublegum.
Some of us get muellered. Some of us don’t.
Posted on Wed, 24 May 2006 at 12:19
#147
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
i hope they dont do another YWTS again, ok its a good album, but its their worst theyve done so far, it’d be nice to go for polythene/swim again but id be happy with echo park again tho.
Posted on Thu, 25 May 2006 at 01:16
#148
buffalo-boy wrote:
Id like to hear more along the lines of the first 2 albums. Lost & Found i didn’t think was very good. If thats their idea of coming back ‘heavy’ then they’ve failed!
Posted on Thu, 25 May 2006 at 08:31
#149
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
at least its heavier than PTS but the new songs on the singles album are quite heavy but not as heavy as i want it or evry1 else. theyre doing a new album and grant said itll b heavier (i bloody hope!)
Posted on Thu, 25 May 2006 at 11:42
#150
romy wrote:
Graeme55? wrote:
i hope they dont do another YWTS again
i didn’t mean “do YWTS 2”, but production-wise. they did it themselves and it worked very well for them - at least in my opinion.
Posted on Sun, 28 May 2006 at 11:08
