#1
tgE wrote:
Of course it’s Marilyn Manson’s fault. The cannabis drocve him to psychosis? OK, we’ve all gone bonkers smoking the stuff.
But killing someone?
That’s in the head already! Stop blaming cannabis.
He was just a friggin psycho
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 12:59
#2
motherh666 wrote:
Sick little puppy. Can’t imagine what went on in that kids head. He’s still a fucking child for christ sake.
Him and his mom should be put away for a long long time.
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 13:04
#3
tgE wrote:
good point - 20 yrs for a 16 year old?
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 13:06
#4
White Psycho wrote:
Killing someone because they smoked cannabis…hmmmm.
“I’m going to kill you…man am I hungry, where’s the fridge?”
He was fucked up to start with, or are they trying to say there’s subliminal messages in a joint?
*takes draw* “Eat your dog’s eyes”
“yes… master…”
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 13:07
#5
motherh666 wrote:
Last thing I want to do when stoned is kill someone. KIll a sandwich or some cookies maybe, but harming another person? No chance.
As for Marilyn Manson? I hope that if I ever lose it and kill Will Young then my music collection will not be blamed.
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 13:13
#6
White Psycho wrote:
a service to music surely?
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 13:15
#7
mr self destruct wrote:
As well as being worried about the fact that cannabis use and listening to heavy metal were cited as factors by the prosecution, I’m just not sure about this conviction. All of the evidence is circumstantial, for a start. There were no forensic links to the convicted, he had no history of violence, and both he and his mother have consistently denied he was near the area at the time…
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 16:02
#8
deadsetgav wrote:
We only know what the media tells us about the case -
plus his mum lied when she gave him an alibi - that much was proven.
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 16:24
#9
mr self destruct wrote:
If the media had information on any firm evidence then we’d have heard about it.
The evidence seems to be:
a) he was interested in horror films, schoolboy satanism and heavy metal, and took recreational drugs
b) their initials were carved in a tree near the murder scene (?)
c) he phoned the murdered girls house after she had been killed, to ask where she was
and d) he gave a TV interview during the murdered girl’s burial
Hardly a watertight conviction IMO.
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 16:31
#10
motherh666 wrote:
The fact he had threatened girls previously with knives is also circumstancial
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 16:37
#11
mr self destruct wrote:
I heard he owned a knife, but not that he’d threatened anyone with it. But I’d better not get into a debate, as I don’t want it to look like I’m defending a convicted murderer ;)
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 16:55
#12
motherh666 wrote:
*starts pointing finger* He’s one of them!!!! String him up!!!
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 16:58
#13
mr self destruct wrote:
If smoking weed, watching horror films, listening to heavy metal, and drawing pentagrams on schoolbooks as a young adolescent are grounds for execution, then I should be in good company at the gallows :)
Posted on Fri, 11 February 2005 at 17:09
Happy New Year folks