Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

Album DONE?!?!?!

#

Started by Eyesore in General Therapy? Topics

Fuckin’ a! I cannot wait…that was fast as hell! More proof that bands like Linkin Park that do 9 months of pre-production should be smacked silly!

Posted on Thu, 26 January 2006 at 19:40

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 40 by 20 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

Unrequited_lad wrote:

If anyone here’s seen ‘Airplane!’, I think you can imagine what it would be like if Linkin Park got smacked silly… a massive queue…

Still, either way, great news about the album indeed. I’m shitting myself with excitement already.

Posted on Thu, 26 January 2006 at 20:00

#2

joseph? wrote:

Yeh well, I’ve just cum.

Posted on Fri, 27 January 2006 at 12:04

#3

Fuzzeh (Jack) wrote:

*excited*

I’m hoping they put some clips up soon.

Posted on Fri, 27 January 2006 at 18:19

#4

Charlie wrote:

Linkin Park are money grabbing-release-the-same-album-four-times eejits !!!!

Who cares about them !!!

:D

Posted on Fri, 27 January 2006 at 18:45

#5

Fuzzeh (Jack) wrote:

Their a produced band as well.. ie a boy band.

Posted on Fri, 27 January 2006 at 18:47

#6

White Psycho wrote:

I knew a guy at college who belted the lead singer in the chest when he was singing and leaning over the crowd. He couldn’t finish the song.

Posted on Fri, 27 January 2006 at 19:03

#7

Charlie wrote:

White Psycho wrote:

I knew a guy at college who belted the lead singer in the chest when he was singing and leaning over the crowd. He couldn’t finish the song.

Did the backing tape continue :D ?

Posted on Fri, 27 January 2006 at 20:56

#8

Eyesore wrote:

I hate bands that take forever to record albums! It’s totally unnecessary! Black Label Society, they go into the studio with no songs written and in two weeks write and record 30 fucking songs! Bands like Linkin Park seriously do pre-production for like a year. It’s ridiculous.

I can’t wait for this album!

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 08:32

#9

Eyesore wrote:

Fuzzeh wrote:

Their a produced band as well.. ie a boy band.

No they’re not.

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 08:33

#10

Billy Blue wrote:

You can diss Linkin Park for a lot of things. But Chester has got an amazing voice, there’s no denying that.

And they aren’t a produced band, they’ve just been a bit over produced, which is a whole different thing.

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 12:29

#11

White Psycho wrote:

They were put together by the record label. That suggests produced to me.

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 13:29

#12

Charlie wrote:

White Psycho wrote:

They were put together by the record label. That suggests produced to me.

1.First album
2.Remixed first album.
3.Live ALbum
4.Another Version of first album - this time with added rapper
5.Second album - identical to first.

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 14:08

#13

Billy Blue wrote:

White Psycho wrote:

They were put together by the record label. That suggests produced to me.

I might be wrong here but I think the whole ‘brought together by the record label’ thing was actually just a false rumour. I’m sure all the memebers of the band, apart from Chester, formed Linkin Park themselves, and they recruited Chester from the other side of the country.

Any way, fuck it. Its only Linkin Park. They pretty much such balls!

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 14:13

#14

Dermot (The Derm) wrote:

I think Linkin Park have a couple of good tunes. That put-together-by-the-record-label rumour is a load of balls though. The Sex Pistols were more of a manufactured band than Linkin Park.

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 14:22

#15

Acquiesce wrote:

Moving along from the linkin park talk, and back to T?… nicely done guys :D

Posted on Sat, 28 January 2006 at 23:54

#16

FNYANKEZ wrote:

any rumours if the new album will get a US release?

Posted on Sun, 29 January 2006 at 03:23

#17

Eyesore wrote:

White Psycho wrote:

They were put together by the record label. That suggests produced to me.

That is a completely ignorant statement which is 100% false. Linkin Park began as Xero, later changed their name to Hybrid Theory after recruiting Chester from Grey Daze (a great Alice In Chains-like band) and eventually changed their name to Linkin Park. There is nothing manufactured about this band. Sure, the ill-advised remix albums are lame, but at the end of the day they’re label decisions.

And for the record, I love Linkin Park.

Posted on Sun, 29 January 2006 at 23:58

#18

White Psycho wrote:

I stand corrected :) For the record, I hate them.

Posted on Mon, 30 January 2006 at 01:55

#19

andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:

Can’t say I ever liked Linkin Park.

I’m gagging for this new album! You see, my life is a jigsaw puzzle and Therapy? albums are the missing pieces. :rolleyes:

Posted on Mon, 30 January 2006 at 04:00

#20

fatboy wrote:

I haven’t bothered with LP. A bit polished like Def Leppard, if you know what I mean. Agree about the Sex Pistols bit; that was Malcolm’s doing when he wanted his own New York Dolls.

Posted on Mon, 30 January 2006 at 13:12

#21

Eyesore wrote:

fatboy wrote:

I haven’t bothered with LP. A bit polished like Def Leppard, if you know what I mean. Agree about the Sex Pistols bit; that was Malcolm’s doing when he wanted his own New York Dolls.

Def Leppard are my all time favorite. Don’t make me come over there!

Posted on Tue, 31 January 2006 at 21:48

#22

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think Linkin Park spend so much time on their albums cos they can… I’m sure loads of bands would love the budget to do that, even T? Tho i’m sure the T? album will still kick far more ass than the crappy Linkin Park one…!

Exsqueeze me? Does someone here LIKE Def Leppard?! Oh dear!

Posted on Tue, 7 February 2006 at 15:16

#23

trigger wrote:

well i suppose therapy? don’t really like to record the album in such a short time span. the more time you got the better will the result be. i get the feeling that the last two albums (high anxiety in particular) were done a bit too quickly.

Posted on Tue, 7 February 2006 at 21:45

#24

Tubthumper (Scott) wrote:

trigger wrote:

well i suppose therapy? don’t really like to record the album in such a short time span. the more time you got the better will the result be.

Not necessarily. The longer you take to record an album, the more things you can change, and eventually, you may be changing too many things if you know what I mean. Sometimes it’s good to have a “raw” sound, rather than it being over-produced.

Posted on Tue, 7 February 2006 at 22:20

#25

Charlie wrote:

THERAPY? ” One Cure Fits All ”

Thoughts ? :D

Posted on Wed, 8 February 2006 at 00:49

#26

Morlock wrote:

I agree that High Anxiety sounds a bit too rushed. It is not necessarily the raw sound, which I liked, it is just that I have the feeling that they could have done a few more takes to really nail some of the songs.

NANE on the other hand is a great production, IMO. It is raw and full of energy, definitely, and yet, the performances are very tight, very good playing.

The only album which I think could have used less or a more dirty production is Shameless. After SPYF it was quite a disappointment. Some of the stuff sounds dead compared to what it going on on other albums.

Semi-Detached, which has tons of layers etc., I consider a great album with an awesome sound. I always kinda wish they could return to that sound someday, since there are still so many possibilites on what to do with it. I am not expecting it - I like how Therapy? always try something new for the band - but while some are waiting for a Troublegum II, a part of me is always hoping for a SD II.

Posted on Wed, 8 February 2006 at 11:05

#27

buffalo-boy wrote:

Hmmm. I liked the sound on High… but it IS rushed, if you listen closely, the 1st note of Who Knows has been chopped and it sounds out of time. NANE production I thought wasn’t great, it sounds empty and sloppy, There were only 3 of them on Troublegum and that sounded MASSIVE.

I think how long it takes to record an album has nothing to do with its quality…Linkin Park have layers of electronics and click tracks and whooshy noises to put on their records. T? have 3 instruments and a voice!

Posted on Wed, 8 February 2006 at 11:30

#28

Charlie wrote:

Yes but Troublegum had 3 guitar parts on every track.

To me it sounds like the black album thing

Rhythm left right and centre and then solos.

Plus the guitar has a chorus effect on it.

That why it sounds massive

Posted on Wed, 8 February 2006 at 12:11

#29

Kyle Bovine (K B) wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

if you listen closely, the 1st note of Who Knows has been chopped and it sounds out of time.

Im not to sure, but isnt the first note on Who Knows technically on the end of the audio track of Hey Satan? I noticed it sounds ok if you listen to Hey Satan and let it fade out as Who Knows fades in. If you skip to track 2, it sounds chopped. Maybe I’m wrong but I think I’m right!

Posted on Wed, 8 February 2006 at 12:34

#30

Rockin'Monkey wrote:

Morlock wrote:

I always kinda wish they could return to that sound someday, since there are still so many possibilites on what to do with it. I am not expecting it - I like how Therapy? always try something new for the band - but while some are waiting for a Troublegum II, a part of me is always hoping for a SD II.

that’s exactly the thing i’m thinking about the SPYF sound. it was the first t? album i listened too and in my opinion still the one i like best (but that’s a very subjective impression). but the thing i like about therapy? even more than SPYF is the way they manage it to make each album sound uniquely. there are very few bands that have made 10(maybe 11) albums that are all great in their own special way and all sound completely different.
so i really can’t wait to listen to one cure fits all!!

Posted on Wed, 8 February 2006 at 13:01

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 40 by 20 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.