Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

Rick Rubin new METALLICA producer

#

Started by Jobrok in Other Bands & Artists

Just read on the web that Rick Rubin is going to produce the next METALLICA album.

Don’t know what to make of this…!!!

An attempt to connect with the younger heavy metal fans, or are they really trying to make a decent album.

Either way, it’s about time they ditched Bob Rock and tried someone new. And let’s face it. They’ve milked the mainstream safe sound forabout 15 years.
And Rick Rubin is an excellent producer.

Posted on Mon, 20 February 2006 at 16:58

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 37 by 14 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

Nitro wrote:

the trainer is ok but if the team lost its power?

Posted on Mon, 20 February 2006 at 17:06

#2

kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:

:) sounds interestings. Hope the stuff will be better than the Anger one had.

Posted on Mon, 20 February 2006 at 17:24

#3

Nitro wrote:

i hope the new album will be full of “real anger”

Posted on Mon, 20 February 2006 at 17:26

#4

Kyle Bovine (K B) wrote:

erdemcapar wrote:

i hope the new album will be full of “real anger”

Nah it will be full of shit dressed up as anger as per usual. I only like Metallica when they arent making music. At least recently.

Posted on Mon, 20 February 2006 at 17:42

#5

Duca wrote:

erdemcapar wrote:

i hope the new album will be full of “real anger”

St. Anger contains real anger, u can be sure of that. James just got out of rehab, the band was finishing of the miserable period, you can feel that on anger.
But I’m glad they got rid of Bob too

Posted on Mon, 20 February 2006 at 20:13

#6

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think they are rich enough to get anyone they want in thats why they’ve gone for Rubin - he has a great track record and its something new for them. I don’t get people who just want another black album though - why?! It was good at the time but will never work if they try and recreate it a 2nd time.

Posted on Tue, 21 February 2006 at 08:13

#7

fatboy wrote:

Bands need a change and Metallica were overdue one.

Posted on Tue, 21 February 2006 at 13:00

#8

Charlie wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think they are rich enough to get anyone they want in thats why they’ve gone for Rubin - he has a great track record and its something new for them. I don’t get people who just want another black album though - why?! It was good at the time but will never work if they try and recreate it a 2nd time.

Hopefully we wont get another Load, or ST. Anger though.

Another black album wouldn’t work ? What if the songs they write came out like that ? If they’re good songs, they’re good songs.

I think it will be good. Rick Rubin in the chair, Rob Trujillo on bass ! :D Proper drum sounds and guitar solos.

It’s better than saint anger already and I havent heard it yet :D

Posted on Tue, 21 February 2006 at 13:05

#9

Kyle Bovine (K B) wrote:

Squall wrote:

It’s better than saint anger already and I havent heard it yet :D

The noises you hear in public toilets are better than St Anger.

Posted on Tue, 21 February 2006 at 13:08

#10

buffalo-boy wrote:

I thought St Anger was definately the best they could have done after all the shit they had been through. Quite a brave move i thought.

Not another Black album, please!!To all the people that are waiting for another Black Album - move on! Its like people who are still waithing for the Manics to repeat the Holy Bible!! Why?? As soon as you start comparing your albums to past ones you’re not being true to yourself. I say go ahead and do as you please Mr Hetfield!

Posted on Wed, 22 February 2006 at 08:10

#11

Charlie wrote:

:p Im just waiting for the 2 bands mentioned in this post to put out a decent album for a change

Posted on Wed, 22 February 2006 at 13:42

#12

buffalo-boy wrote:

lol! I agree, maybe they weren’t the 2 best examples! I can’t think of any bands that still going and writing better albums than the one that made them big in the 1st place! There must be some though!

Posted on Thu, 23 February 2006 at 08:17

#13

Charlie wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

lol! I agree, maybe they weren’t the 2 best examples! I can’t think of any bands that still going and writing better albums than the one that made them big in the 1st place! There must be some though!

:D Depends if you prefer Dookie or Nimrod.

Posted on Thu, 23 February 2006 at 18:53

#14

buffalo-boy wrote:

Nimrod was dreadful, you cannot be serious!! There’s only about 4 good songs on it!

Posted on Fri, 24 February 2006 at 11:13

#15

Charlie wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

Nimrod was dreadful, you cannot be serious!! There’s only about 4 good songs on it!

:o You sir, are a bounder and a cad. Fisticuffs at dawn.

Posted on Fri, 24 February 2006 at 12:31

#16

Bad Karma wrote:

It’s been a long time since i’ve been interested in a Metallica album but this one might be worth checking out.

Posted on Fri, 24 February 2006 at 14:12

#17

buffalo-boy wrote:

Squall wrote:

:o You sir, are a bounder and a cad. Fisticuffs at dawn.

Bring it on. Sorry but Green Day aren’t all that. Well, i don’t like the album anyway!! Its not BAD per se, its just that when you’ve got Dookie - you don’t really need another album like it thats not as good. And when you’re limited in style like they are 18 songs is stretching it a bit.

Posted on Fri, 24 February 2006 at 14:22

#18

Charlie wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

Bring it on. Sorry but Green Day aren’t all that. Well, i don’t like the album anyway!! Its not BAD per se, its just that when you’ve got Dookie - you don’t really need another album like it thats not as good. And when you’re limited in style like they are 18 songs is stretching it a bit.

limited in style ? There are quite a few styles on that album.

Pop Punk, harder edged punk, ballady rock, acoustic rock, instrumental…

i just think its a great album. better than warning any rate, which i also like.

I just love Green Day !!

And no way are they in the same category as shower of shit bands such as Good Charlotte, Bowling For Soup, New Found Glory et al !!

Posted on Fri, 24 February 2006 at 18:49

#19

buffalo-boy wrote:

Wow! You’re right, both punk AND hard edged punk! Ballad rock AND acoustic rock?! Thats amazing! They really AREN’T stuck in one style are they?!!

Sorry, but that is really funny! :D

Know what you mean though - i think its a shame that history will lump them in with crap like Good Charlotte. Green Day were here 1st. Death to poser punk!!

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 08:30

#20

Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:

Metallica have finally seen the light and kick that blonde bandwrecker(as opposed to homewrecker) to the curb I think its time to celebrate. :)

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 17:20

#21

RobbyVDH wrote:

I’ll drink to that :)

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 17:47

#22

Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:

Cheers *Hits can of Bavaria off the screen*

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 17:50

#23

RobbyVDH wrote:

cheers *opens up a cold Palm*

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 17:52

#24

Charlie wrote:

…

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 20:10

#25

Charlie wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

Wow! You’re right, both punk AND hard edged punk! Ballad rock AND acoustic rock?! Thats amazing! They really AREN’T stuck in one style are they?!!

Sorry, but that is really funny! :D

:mad: I mean that not every song sounds identical. You know what you’re gonna get when you get a green day album - but Nimrod has variations. You dont expect to buy a Green Day cd and it be avant garde - electro. Thank you radiohead.

Posted on Mon, 27 February 2006 at 20:15

#26

buffalo-boy wrote:

Pip wrote:

Metallica have finally seen the light and kick that blonde bandwrecker(as opposed to homewrecker) to the curb I think its time to celebrate. :)

Unfortunately he’s ioff to do the Lost Prophets album so they will be everywhere when they’re new album comes out. You have been warned! :cool:

Posted on Tue, 28 February 2006 at 08:20

#27

Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I hate the lost prophets

Posted on Tue, 28 February 2006 at 10:18

#28

Dennis wrote:

Pip wrote:

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I hate the lost prophets

:D Me too! Dunno why bands have to try so hard to sound American when they come from Wales

Posted on Tue, 28 February 2006 at 12:26

#29

RobbyVDH wrote:

Saw them 2 times and they sucked twice.

Bad average.

Posted on Tue, 28 February 2006 at 17:12

#30

Gimme Back My Brainsaw (Fuck it) wrote:

Yes Bob Rock sucks, (follows crowd in bashing the guy)

Rick rubin better not make James sing songs about Pizza Pie or do any Nine Inch Nails covers accoustically or im going to get pissed off.

Posted on Tue, 28 February 2006 at 18:57

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 37 by 14 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.