#181
Taunty Dan wrote:
a slap round the head would of sufficed but hey, whatever gets you thru the night…
Posted on Thu, 20 March 2008 at 22:59
#182
Charlie wrote:
Just as long as you didn’t actually WATCH ” Barb Wire “
Posted on Thu, 20 March 2008 at 23:29
#183
butters (mikey) wrote:
…errrmmmm
*begins self flogging*
Posted on Thu, 20 March 2008 at 23:38
#184
deadsetgav wrote:
…Ah - thats another - Da Vinci Code… like watching paint dry - only without the fumes
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 08:55
#185
The Auto Surgeon (Mark) wrote:
Cube has to be the worst film I’ve every know to have a sequel, let alone be the starting point for a trilogy!!
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 12:37
#186
Charlie wrote:
Cube was good - Cube 2 was not great and Cube Zero was alright. I liked it’s originality. Not some slasher hunting college kids AGAIN.
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 14:08
#187
The Auto Surgeon (Mark) wrote:
Urgh! White Coat for Muskeg, White Coat for Muskeg!! The premise was okay, but the acting and the dialogue was just dire.
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 14:45
#188
butters (mikey) wrote:
i agree with muskeg that cube was pretty good, but i also agree its not a film that should have a sequel, let alone 2
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 15:52
#189
Charlie wrote:
It was a low budget film - what did you expect. Besides id rather see something original and interesting than obvious models running around getting picked off one by one directed by Wes ” cannot make a scary film for shit ” Craven… Although Scream was good because it was so tongue in cheek.
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 18:40
#190
Taunty Dan wrote:
Posted on Fri, 21 March 2008 at 20:20
#191
Charlie wrote:
Yes, But you have to wonder - was Scream 2 purposefully not as good as the first one to fit in with the whole “ironic” thing they were going with ? I say hats off if that is the case.
Can you imagine wes craven going to an executive in hollywood somewhere ?
” I’ve got an idea for an ironic slasher trilogy ”
” Go on ”
” Well the first movie will set up all the rules for surviving a horror movie trilogy in a movie within a movie kind of way, whilst at the same time honouring and making fun of horror movies past ”
“Sounds interesting ”
” The sequel will obviously purposefully be bead to tie in with the whole ’ ironic - movie within a movie - second in trilogy is usually the worst one - type of thing ”
” Err what ? make a movie bad on purpose ? are you freaking nuts ? FORGET A BOUD IT ”
I can imgaine the movie studio calling up Wes Craven a few years later going ” This teen slasher thing is huge - we want scream 4 5 and 6…hello ? hello ?…”
Posted on Sat, 22 March 2008 at 14:23
#192
butters (mikey) wrote:
which one of scream 4, 5 or 6 would be the one based in space?
Posted on Sat, 22 March 2008 at 14:49
#193
The Auto Surgeon (Mark) wrote:
Think number 6, then he could tie number 7 in with Jason.
Then it would be “Face Off of the Masks!!” :-D
Posted on Sat, 22 March 2008 at 18:05
#194
Charlie wrote:
MASK V MASK V M.A.S.K Ghostface Killah Vs. Jason Vs Blatant Transformers Rip Off.
Posted on Sat, 22 March 2008 at 21:51
#195
The Auto Surgeon (Mark) wrote:
Not forgetting a cameo by Kato! :-D
Posted on Sun, 23 March 2008 at 11:59
#196
sreeja (sreeja nair) wrote:
In my opinion the worst movies are
1 Shrek1,2 and3.
2 chicken little he’s a male but still a chicken.
3 Barnyard, gawd!!
Posted on Thu, 10 April 2008 at 10:59
