Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

In the news…

#

Started by deadsetgav

Rather than post in the ‘links to cool stuff’ thread - I thought I’d start a new one specifically for shit like this.

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13527679,00.html

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 06:38

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 783 by 55 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

allroy wrote:

I wonder if you can appeal against any sentences passed this way.

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 07:28

#2

Dennis wrote:

Scissors Paper Stone becomes “RPS” or “Rock Paper Stone” in the US.

Is there NOTHING they can’t fuck around with and give a new name?!?!?!?!

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 09:36

#3

Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:

ROCK paper STONE ?

what happened to the scissors ?

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 09:47

#4

Dennis wrote:

Oops, my bad, I meant scissors, of course. Even the yanks can’t fuck up a game THAT much!

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 09:52

#5

mr self destruct wrote:

A game of “Cock, Muff, Bumhole” (Nathan Barley) would have been funnier.

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 10:05

#6

deadsetgav wrote:

Indeed… that would have been totally mexico!

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 11:24

#7

mr self destruct wrote:

It would have been well plastic.

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 11:39

#8

Hanne wrote:

Hmm… strange one, in my experience (used to do some work as a solicitor’s clerk) judges tend to do strange things to teach lessons, especially when there is any kind of pettiness involved.

On first thought where to interview a witness doesn’t seem like such a big deal but if they were ‘bickering’ about it? (and we all know lawyers don’t ‘bicker’, they use bigger words and more sardonic comments). The location could be detrimental to the prosecution or defence.

It could be grounds for appeal, or certainly questionning the judge’s authority; he should have resolved it by what was best for the witness.

But we all know how wank witness and victim services can be :rolleyes:

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 11:48

#9

Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:

:o Only In America.

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 19:12

#10

Punkwank (Tijn) wrote:

and holland.. bit of belgium also :D

cheers

Posted on Fri, 9 June 2006 at 21:55

#11

Zorn wrote:

deadsetgav wrote:

Indeed… that would have been totally mexico!

Define “Mexico”. I take issue with such references since my wife is Mexican (seriously).

Want a fight? I’ll hide behind my Mrs anytime…

Posted on Sat, 10 June 2006 at 00:22

#12

FNYANKEZ wrote:

Only in Florida!!..or California :D To much sun, fries their brains

I’ve also heard this called Rauchambeau (or however you spell his name). Some French general.

Posted on Sat, 10 June 2006 at 02:08

#13

deadsetgav wrote:

Zorn wrote:

Define “Mexico”.

Mex·i·co (mĕk’sÄ­-kô’)

A country of south-central North America. Southern Mexico was the site of various advanced civilizations beginning with the Olmec and including the Maya, Zapotec, Toltec, Mixtec, and Aztec cultures. Mexico was conquered by Cortés in 1521 and held by the Spanish until 1821. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo that ended the Mexican War (1846–1848) awarded all lands north of the Rio Grande to the United States. Mexico City is the capital and the largest city. Population: 106,000,000.

Posted on Mon, 12 June 2006 at 06:21

#14

Sabotage wrote:

“We will make sure that rock, paper scissors is not made a mockery of by the legal system,” he said.

Good. I’m so glad to hear it. :rolleyes:

Posted on Mon, 12 June 2006 at 14:37

#15

deadsetgav wrote:

Posted on Thu, 15 June 2006 at 10:22

#16

soul doubt (an) wrote:

:D crazy cat!!!

Posted on Thu, 15 June 2006 at 10:34

#17

Hanne wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/southern_counties/5081744.stm

“An artist’s sculpture has been rejected by the Royal Academy of Arts which has instead opted to display the wooden support it was put on. “

Posted on Thu, 15 June 2006 at 15:31

#18

Divers (Simon) wrote:

lol i saw that in the paper this morning…how fickle art can be.

Posted on Thu, 15 June 2006 at 15:55

#19

Hanne wrote:

I suppose if you consider art to be something that evokes reaction and thought it has certainly served its purpose.

I love BBC news
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5013866.stm

Posted on Thu, 15 June 2006 at 16:02

#20

Alex wrote:

Quote (author unknown):

…and I still can’t find it…

Posted on Thu, 15 June 2006 at 21:26

#22

Hanne wrote:

Emotionally challenged

So you’re 16 and feeling low. Now there is an adolescent angst subculture called emo. And through the internet it has become an international teen phenomenon

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,27869-2257342.html

It’s things like this which make me feel fucking old at 20 (well, a week to go).

Posted on Thu, 6 July 2006 at 16:28

#23

deadsetgav wrote:

I’m glad they cleared that one up…

I like the Emo grass, that cuts itself joke though :D

Posted on Thu, 6 July 2006 at 18:26

#24

deadsetgav wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5153936.stm

Some good news for a change.

Racist, biggoted cunt!

Posted on Thu, 6 July 2006 at 20:40

#25

caffeinebomb wrote:

Two tours a year - working your balls off there Jim, why not try getting a job?

Posted on Fri, 7 July 2006 at 02:00

#26

deadsetgav wrote:

I cant believe there are actually people that would go out and pay to see him once a year, nevermind twice.

Posted on Fri, 7 July 2006 at 06:19

#27

Jobrok wrote:

deadsetgav wrote:

Mex·i·co (mĕk’sÄ­-kô’)
Mexico City is the capital and the largest city. Population: 106,000,000.

Veering off topic for a minute. But I’m presuming that this figure is the population of the country and not the city.

If not! then they should just rename it “MEGA-CITY 1”
(Judge Dredd fans! Anyone?)

Posted on Fri, 7 July 2006 at 07:41

#28

Cuchulain wrote:

Posted on Fri, 7 July 2006 at 12:18

#29

deadsetgav wrote:

Jobrok wrote:

I’m presuming that this figure is the population of the country and not the city.

Population was for the country ;)

Posted on Fri, 7 July 2006 at 12:34

#30

deadsetgav wrote:

http://www.sky.com/skynews/picture_gallery/picture_gallery/0,,701 … -1,00.html

Thats just… wrong - look at Gordon fucking Brown!

Wonder what the ‘Prescot’ one could have been?

Posted on Fri, 14 July 2006 at 06:29

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 783 by 55 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.