#1
punkwack (Tijn) wrote:
Oasis, coldplay, bettie serveert… :D
cheers
Posted on Sat, 15 July 2006 at 20:30
#2
Squall wrote:
All those bands are way way way better than Babyshambles !!!
:mad:
Posted on Sat, 15 July 2006 at 21:22
#3
Lola wrote:
i’d rather watch that than coldplay any day
Posted on Sat, 15 July 2006 at 23:47
#4
Taunty Dan wrote:
whats wrong with babyshambles?
Posted on Sun, 16 July 2006 at 08:10
#5
Squall wrote:
Posted on Sun, 16 July 2006 at 09:17
#6
Divers (Simon) wrote:
I personally don’t like the bands music that much, but it didn’t seem that bad…i’ve heard far worse bands.
I thought his acoustic performance on Jonathan ross was pretty good.
Posted on Sun, 16 July 2006 at 09:28
#7
Squall wrote:
I didn’t see it but it was probably just bar chords :D
Posted on Sun, 16 July 2006 at 11:19
#8
Divers (Simon) wrote:
To be honest mate it was a lot of complicated picking at times, and some interesting chords i was impressed as i didn’t really think he could play.
Posted on Sun, 16 July 2006 at 11:21
#9
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
the guitarist is shit!!
i personally wouldnt say that theyre the worst but they are bad.
Posted on Sun, 16 July 2006 at 23:57
#10
buffalo-boy wrote:
is this thread for literally terrible bands that can’t play or personal dislikes?
Cos G n R were worse than a pub band at Download, truly poor for the first 45 mins! :D
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 08:20
#11
Squall wrote:
Did they play for 45 mins ? :D
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 08:53
#12
Divers (Simon) wrote:
Graeme55? wrote:
I never said he wasn’t, i was talking about Pete. I just didn’t know he could play guitar as well as he did. Not saying he is a genius at it but he did some very nice things on it.
I’m still not a fan of them.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 08:54
#13
Squall wrote:
Noel Gallagher can sing and play guitar better then the both of them.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 09:15
#14
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
There’s two Pete Doherty’s? :eek:
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 10:01
#15
Divers (Simon) wrote:
Squall wrote:
Noel Gallagher can sing and play guitar better then the both of them.
who gives a shit? there are thousands of people who can sing and play guitar better than Noel Gallagher (and i’m not saying that Noel is shit either)…your point being?
I’m not having a go, but what did that comment have to do with anything that was being discussed, it’s just a random statement.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 10:49
#16
Squall wrote:
Nah - it’s just that people seem to love Libertines when quite clearly oasis are far better musicians, yet they get all the shit.
I dont think people will still remember any libertines songs in 10 years
But people still know all the oasis hits 10 years on.
My point being that Babyshambles seem to get a lot of praise for being absolutely awful,whilst oasis have great songs that people remember and yet they get all the crap from people.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:00
#17
Divers (Simon) wrote:
I don’t know any libertines song now!(but i think i missed them in oz):D
I get your point, I think Oasis get lots of shit like Metallica or any other band that had some huge albums then then did two rather poor ones..the music industry and public are very fickle and just zone in and remember the bad ones and ignore any good ones that have came out after.
Green day for instance got almost forgotten but they didn’t really do a bad album after Dookie..i actually prefer Insomniac… it seems to take an album to go supernova and the music industry to make them bum chums for anyone to give a band some praise again after a lull.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:07
#18
Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:
True…but isn’t it always the way that your fave albums by any given band are the ones the band/ fans hate and the ones you think are weaker are the ones everyone w*nks themselves off over? :D
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:10
#19
Hanne wrote:
How dare people listen to Libertines, when you consider Oasis better? The cheek of it.
Some people have grown up with the Libertines and now Babyshambles and Dirty Pretty Things. It’s already been 4 years since Up The Bracket and I still hear Time For Heroes (and 50 people singing along) in clubs.
Are Oasis really doing much exciting right now, musically or otherwise? Doherty’s like a soap opera. It appeals to people, it’s the exact definition of pop culture, and that is what is going to be carried forward.
Same debate in 10 years with Libertines replacing Oasis.
(For the record I’m neutral to both)
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:17
#20
Divers (Simon) wrote:
Dennis wrote:
True…but isn’t it always the way that your fave albums by any given band are the ones the band/ fans hate and the ones you think are weaker are the ones everyone w*nks themselves off over? :D
So are you trying to tell me that Ozzy Osbournes “the Ultimate Sin” album ISN’T the greatest album he ever made???:eek:
@Hanne Thats very well put, and at the end of the day peoples tastes are peoples tastes whos got the right to argue with them.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:25
#21
Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:
Ultimate Sin?! Erm…toss up between No More Tears and Blizzard of Ozz, for me…!
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:31
#22
Divers (Simon) wrote:
I was joking:D
I think those two would be my choices as well.:)..though i do think ozzmosis has its moments.
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:32
#23
Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:
Phew, I kinda hoped you were!
My fave would actually be Live And Loud, cos it is a neat Best Of and a great live album at the same time, but I was using the usual “No Live Albums/ No Comps” rule :D
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:34
#24
Gav wrote:
Squall wrote:
Noel Gallagher can sing and play guitar better then the both of them.
Steve Vai is a better guitarist than Andy Cairns, but I know who’s album I would rather listen to
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:44
#25
Fordonian wrote:
Dammit Gav! I was gonna say Vai! You must be in league with that Kinderbeastchild! *suspects Gav of selling his soul to Kinder in return for paranormal powers*
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:48
#26
Gav wrote:
Yes - I am a godparent to said chocolate-egg, freak-child!
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 11:53
#27
Taunty Dan wrote:
Squall wrote:
Nah - it’s just that people seem to love Libertines when quite clearly oasis are far better musicians, yet they get all the shit.
I dont think people will still remember any libertines songs in 10 years
But people still know all the oasis hits 10 years on.
My point being that Babyshambles seem to get a lot of praise for being absolutely awful,whilst oasis have great songs that people remember and yet they get all the crap from people.
good god man, what is it with you and oasis LOL :D
Whether someone is technically gifted or not means nothing, NOTHING!!! its the songs!
i didn’t see owt wrong with that babbyshambles vid you posted, thats not a one off, thats what they’re really like live!
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 12:02
#28
Squall wrote:
Quote (author unknown):
Whether someone is technically gifted or not means nothing, NOTHING!!! its the songs!
i didn’t see owt wrong with that babbyshambles vid you posted, thats not a one off, thats what they’re really like live!
And that’s a good thing ?
Oasis doing nothing exciting ? How about a highly successful world tour in support of a bloody good return to form album ? :)
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 13:06
#29
Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:
Yeah but Barry Manilow and Steps have sold millions of pounds worth of gig tickets over the years, so a successful tour proves jack shit.
Not slagging off Oasis here, just saying that big ernormo tours don’t make for a good band.
Still, that Babyshambles video sucks big time! What a load of shite!
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 13:10
#30
Taunty Dan wrote:
Squall wrote:
And that’s a good thing ?
YES!!
Squall wrote:
Oasis doing nothing exciting ? How about a highly successful world tour in support of a bloody good return to form album ? :)
i swear to god you’re shagging that band!! :D
Posted on Mon, 17 July 2006 at 13:20
