Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

Foo Fighters- In Your Honour

#

Started by Divers (Simon) in Other Bands & Artists

Just bought the new album and I really enjoyed it. The Rock disc is much better in my opinion then the last two albums they released. And the Acoustic Disc I thought was very good some strong songs and if you get it with the dvd then it’s in surround sound which sounded great, also Josh hommes guitar playing on the last song is very impressive.
An all round good album :D

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 14:03

You’re viewing replies 1–23 of 23 by 16 people

·

Page: First | Previous | Next | Last

#1

motherh666 wrote:

I’m listening to it now. So far 1/2 n 1/2 with it. Will see later how much I like or dislike it.

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 14:13

#2

JSar666 wrote:

That new single is absolute gash, but I’ve got a good feeling about the ablum.

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 14:15

#3

--neville-- wrote:

Title: hmmmmmmmmm

Just got the new foos cd. I was really really hoping for a return of the old foos but nevermind. I think the acustic cd is better than the rock. The latter seems to be more of the american radio friendly throw away rock/pop jazz whilst the former sounds like Mr.Grohl has been listning to too much ryan adams!

All in all not a bad effort but could do better.

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 14:26

#4

Andy D (Andy) wrote:

Well, I still have to buy the ablum but it’s already sure that I’m going to buy the ablum so I will let you know what I think about the ablum.

If all the other songs on the ablum were as good as The Best Of Me, it would be a very good ablum. :D

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 16:31

#5

Bad Karma wrote:

The last Foo Fighters album was so shite i’m not even going to bother with them this time around,i don’t like Best Of Me so i doubt i’d like any of the rest of it.

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 16:37

#6

motherh666 wrote:

Is there someone else singing on the album to alla QotSA or is that Grohl trying something different with his voice in a few songs?

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 17:35

#7

Divers (Simon) wrote:

Tayor Hawkins sings on one of the songs, but the other guitar player can sing as he fronts jackson united as well, maybe it’s one of them.

It’s a solid album but I still think the first two were amazing.

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 17:44

#8

Bad Karma wrote:

I read the drummer sings on one of the songs.

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 17:44

#9

Divers (Simon) wrote:

and he can sing, just as long as he stays behind the kit and doesn’t go all Phil Collins the world will still be a safe place.:)

Posted on Mon, 13 June 2005 at 18:04

#10

Alan wrote:

I got the album earlier this week, and it just sounds sooooo borrrrring :(

Even worse than “One By One” perhaps?

Every song just sounds the damn same - nothing remotely as good as ‘Hey Johnny Park’ or ‘Everlong’.

Posted on Fri, 24 June 2005 at 11:31

#11

fatboy wrote:

I’ve only played the album once and I quite liked it. Okay, its not a patch on The Colour And The Shape, but the rock and acustic thing worked. (Some of the softer stuff could have been done by Jeff Buckly, and that’s no bad thing).

Posted on Fri, 24 June 2005 at 12:14

#12

deadsetgav wrote:

I have played it a few times and it is ok - i quite like it.

Its not a classic but it aint bad either - although I think Audioslave set a new benchmark for boring this year…

Posted on Fri, 24 June 2005 at 12:38

#13

Bad Karma wrote:

I think Team Sleep could lay claim to that title as well along with Idlewild.

I’ve noticed in a couple of interviews Dave Grohl has said One By One was shit well half shit he thinks the songs on the second half of the album are weak.It’s funny when One By One first came out he thought it was the best thing they’d ever done:rolleyes:.

One good thing about the new Foos album is they chose to release the rock and acoustic albums together instead of releasing them separately and charging full price for the both of them unlike System Of A Down who are anti- capitalists and releasing two albums this year and charging full price for the both of them.

Posted on Fri, 24 June 2005 at 12:47

#14

Divers (Simon) wrote:

Bad Karma wrote:

I’ve noticed in a couple of interviews Dave Grohl has said One By One was shit well half shit he thinks the songs on the second half of the album are weak.It’s funny when One By One first came out he thought it was the best thing they’d ever done:rolleyes:.

Well these days everyone says that it’s there best album. It would be quite funny hearing them say.
“our new album is pretty shit, but please buy it as we need the money”

I think Big Black were one of the few people who put stickers on there albums saying things like this album is great but the next one will be better or this album isn’t as good as the last.

Posted on Fri, 24 June 2005 at 17:27

#15

carl-idle-will-kill (carl) wrote:

awful awful album
thats all there needs 2 b said:P

Posted on Mon, 27 June 2005 at 09:24

#16

Charlie wrote:

carlofthevplates wrote:

awful awful album
thats all there needs 2 b said:P

Every foo album is worse than the previous one.

And every single time, Dave says : ” its our best one ”

And In Your Honour is fucking shit !

WORSE than One by One!

Posted on Mon, 27 June 2005 at 14:30

#17

carl-idle-will-kill (carl) wrote:

think you hit the nail on the head there!

Posted on Sun, 3 July 2005 at 15:08

#18

allroy wrote:

Sorry to say, but this is a disappointing album. The ‘acoustic’ cd is just boring and even the ‘rock’ cd is just a collection of average Foos tunes.

Posted on Sun, 17 July 2005 at 15:19

#19

Bad Karma wrote:

I have some bad new for Foo Fighter fans they’re thinking of going in an acoustic direction for the next album *yawns boring*.

http://nme.com/news/113089.htm

Posted on Sun, 24 July 2005 at 10:35

#20

not_that_kind_of_guy (a story on the radio) wrote:

i was forced (well almost) to listen to this album yesterday and although i didn’t find it particularly bad, it was just the same old foo fighters stuff that could’ve been put out at any time over the last 10 years or so. i preferred the acoustic album if only for novelty value.

Posted on Sun, 24 July 2005 at 12:56

#21

Kyle Bovine (K B) wrote:

I didnt like it, its very throwaway, but then at least the Foos are sticking to their guns by being consistant.

Posted on Mon, 25 July 2005 at 13:53

#22

Dusty (Chris Davies) wrote:

now that i have had a good listen i can say that the first disc is their 2nd best album behind the colour + the shape.haven’t bothered with the acoustic disk.going to see them with oasis in cardiff december that should be a quality gig.

Posted on Tue, 2 August 2005 at 12:42

#23

Dr. Bigjoint wrote:

I think “In Your Honor” is their weakest album, but… There are some superb songs on it: “In Your Honor”, “Best Of You”, “DOA”. And their weakest album is much better than besf albums of many bands.
I’ve heard the new songs live already, they sounded really great.

Posted on Mon, 8 August 2005 at 14:07

There are no more replies in this discussion. (Go to the homepage)

to post a reply. Sign in if you’re already a member.

You’re viewing replies 1–23 of 23 by 16 people

·

Page: First | Previous | Next | Last

Other discussions started by Divers

Title Replies Started Last post
The 2008 End of year round up. in Other Bands & Artists 41 10 Nov 2008
by Divers		 Yesterday, 16:34
by up_in_flames
A General Patton Thread in Other Bands & Artists 144 13 Mar 2006
by Divers		 25 Sep 2008
by realityfuck
The Fall in Other Bands & Artists 12 9 Jul 2005
by Divers		 14 May 2008
by Divers
Band/Person Name game in Other Bands & Artists 264 24 Apr 2005
by Divers		 15 Feb 2008
by The Auto Surgeon
The Mighty Boosh in Chit-Chat 148 4 Aug 2005
by Divers		 18 Jan 2008
by mr self destruct

View all 70 discussions started by Divers.