Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

in all seriousness

#

Started by innocentx

in all seriousness, we all know therapy? made great enough albums in the past to make it huge.do you think that the reason they never made it really big was because they suffered from a case of ‘video killed the radio star’? …if you think about it, their videos aren’t that good. they got pretty good promotion in europe..too bad they didn’t get promoted much in the united states

Posted on Mon, 5 November 2001 at 01:42

You’re viewing replies 1–24 of 24 by 10 people

·

Page: First | Previous | Next | Last

#1

The Ostrich wrote:

they didnt make it famous cause there heavy metal it aint mainstream music

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 12:41

#2

innocentx wrote:

really how does that explain the success of non mainstream bands like slayer and pantera? they didn’t make it big because of lack of promotion in the one country that could have made them real big : the united states. they were succesful in europe but bands that are only famous there and not in the u.s. come and go

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 13:22

#3

Ian Hayllar wrote:

I wouldnt really classify Slayer and Pantera as being that successful, especially when you compare them to Therapy?

I disagree that success in the US gives makes a band ‘successful’. I am not anti-american when I say this, but three quarters of all UK bands that are superstars in the UK, Europe and Japan have not had success in the US, because the market is generally far too retarded to ‘get it’. Take a look at the American charts - mostly rubbish - and has been for years. The only rock bands that have made it have had to ‘dumb down’ for the US or were pretty safe and conventional anyway. I would gladly take the fame and fortune that comes from from success in other territories without having to change for the US market.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 14:05

#4

Ian Hayllar wrote:

I wouldnt really classify Slayer and Pantera as being that successful, especially when you compare them to Therapy?

I disagree that success in the US gives makes a band ‘successful’. I am not anti-american when I say this, but three quarters of all UK and European bands that are superstars in the UK, Europe and Japan have not had success in the US, because the market is generally far too retarded to ‘get it’. Take a look at the American charts - mostly rubbish - and has been for years. The only rock bands that have made it have had to ‘dumb down’ for the US or were pretty safe and conventional anyway. I would gladly take the fame and fortune that comes from from success in other territories without having to change for the US market.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 14:06

#5

innocentx wrote:

‘they were succesful in europe but bands that are only famous there and not in the u.s. come and go’

do i always need to repeat things on this board?

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 16:34

#6

innocentx wrote:

by the way, i’m not a fan of slayer or pantera but they sold over a million albums. i would classify any band that does that as successful

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 16:36

#7

Ian Hayllar wrote:

do YOU always need to be so negative and rude to people?

‘they were succesful in europe but bands that are only famous there and not in the u.s. come and go’…

bands that are not famous in the US do not ‘come and go’, they exist perfectly well in the rest of the world with much success without the US taking any notice. I can think of a million examples. I can also think of a lot of examples of bands that achieve success in the US and ‘come and go’ in the rest of the world, because, quite simply, they are pants.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 16:39

#8

mfgeorge wrote:

that has to be one of my favourite english sayings ‘… they are pants’… cracks me up everytime… and yes, a lot of US bands are pants!!!

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 16:43

#9

Ian Hayllar wrote:

by the way, Therapy have sold a million too.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 16:58

#10

opalmantra wrote:

I think I can safely say ‘Troublegum’ and ‘Infernal Love’ sold more copies than all Slayer albums together. Slayer never had a hit either…haha…that would be good, though!

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 17:23

#11

Body Bag Girl Iris wrote:

Does any of you know how it goes with the sellings of:
The best off cd and Shameless? The cd sells good at the concerts…

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 17:34

#12

Ian Hayllar wrote:

I’ll have a chat to Motor and find out although I guess they’re usually not that keen on giving out sales figures.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 17:45

#13

Ian Hayllar wrote:

I know that Troublegum sold well over 100,000 in the UK alone and Infernal Love is just under that figure. With European, Japanese etc sales included the figure for Troublegum I seem to remember seeing somewhere around 250,000. I’ll see what I can dig out of the memory palace.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 17:48

#14

Body Bag Girl Iris wrote:

Thanks Ian, I still regret I can’t come to Berlin or any other German gigs, I would have liked to meet you in person, you seem okay!!!
Iris

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 18:33

#15

Christian wrote:

I’ve read a long time ago that Troublegum sold about 300000 copies in Europe (94) and in the US it were about 70000. I’ve also read that Infernal Love sold about 75000 copies in Germany. I can’t remember where I read it exactly, I think the Troublegum sales are from MTV Videotext - so I wouldn’t lay my hand into the fire for it, you know
;)

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 18:41

#16

Roni wrote:

Hey,
As far as Michael McKeegan said to an ?Israelie news paper a while ago, Toublegum has sold more than 600,000 copies and Infernal Love wasn’t very far from that at all.
BUT, does anyone have any idea how much
Semi-Detached/Shameless/Suicie Pact You First/Nurse sold?
bye bye

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 18:44

#17

innocentx wrote:

have you people noticed that the only albums that you mention that sold a lot of copies are toublegum and infernal love…that says a lot. and jointly, they haven’t sold more than a million copies. infernal sold nearly 500 000, troublegum sold 120 000, and the rest of the albums collectively sold 230 000. if i find the article i got that info from, i’ll post it here. they haven’t even sold 850 000 albums collectively.

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 20:41

#18

innocentx wrote:

more than 850, 000 i mean. that’s not a bad even though they released a lot of albums. but considering how good a band therapy? is/was, you’d expect better numbers. therapy? fans have gone down album after album following infernal love (meaning people who usd to listen to therapy? stopped buying therapy? albums)

Posted on Tue, 13 November 2001 at 20:44

#19

Ian Hayllar wrote:

although I agree with Innocents comment about fans going down, one thing you have to remember is that Troublegum peaked with high sales because of many things, not least because they made a fantastic record, timed it just right and stood out like a sore thumb from the rubbish around at the time. Then along came Infernal Love which most people, as Michael once said, expected to be Troublegum Mark 2, but wasnt. By that time, the casual fans that the band picked up bought Infernal Love but were disappointed, hence the subsquent drop off. Add to that the marketing clout that A&M put behind the band before that wasnt really present for the next albums. All in all, I think that Therapy’s fanbase hasnt really shrunk, theyve just got rid of the fans that wanted them to make Troublegum Mark 2, 3,4 and 5. The same amount of fans bought Shameless as they did Nurse. Personally, Im glad the guys have gone down this route, they develop a new sound with each album and endless copies of TG would be boring.

Posted on Wed, 14 November 2001 at 14:49

#20

Christian wrote:

I believe that has a lot to do with trends. Andy claimed that Troublegum became a success because it was part of the ‘rock wave’ in the first half of the 90’s, Nirvana, Offspring etc. Today’s trend is probably ‘new metal’, bands like Slipknot, Limp Bizkit.
Quality music, or better, ‘honest, self written’ music isn’t really the thing that determines sales, imo, the music industry sure is the main influence.

Posted on Wed, 14 November 2001 at 16:11

#21

Body Bag Girl Iris wrote:

Trends, but also looks… I don’t think many girls/boys have a poster of Therapy? above their bed…
But Britney Spears,Kyli,Lopez,Back Street Boys… that is all based on looks and to write a song that you can’t get out of your head…
loads and loads of promotion… the media market helps in lot in what you sell or don’t sell.
A Dutch radiopromoter/DJ (Henk Westbroek for the Dutch readers) did a stunt a few years ago when Sepultura came with the song: Roots Bloody Roots. In the Top 10 was only rubbisch music, he played that song every day and asked everybody to buy that song… after one or 2 weeks the song was number 1!!! Sepultura with Roots Bloody Roots…
So only 1 person made it possible to get a song in the top 10, ‘cause no other stations where playing it and it was also not on TV. That’s a bit crazy isn’t it, but then you also see it’s all about promotion…

Posted on Wed, 14 November 2001 at 16:38

#23

satanslittlehelper wrote:

Its definately about promotion, marketing, adverts, etc.. which is why i dont see t? reaching the sales, or fan base they had before, as long as they are on ark. This is the way i prefer it, i like the fact therapy are away from all the mainstream crap. To me it means smaller more personal gigs. and it just makes them more… special.

Posted on Wed, 14 November 2001 at 19:58

#24

alyx-13 wrote:

I’m from the states and unfortunately, sales and success of a band over are almost entirely dependent on this fucked up system of payoffs from the record companies to the various companies that own all the various radio stations over here. Bassiacally the record companies with the big money determine who has the big radio hits. This it why you’ll almost never hear a band that isn’t on a major label(or supported by one) on the radio out here.

This goes teh same for MTV. I remember Therapy? received a healthy bit of attention when Hats Off To The Insane was released, but that was about it. They probably played ‘Screamager’ a half dozen times and maybe one or two other clips once or twice. Even then that was on the (cough-cough) ‘alternative’ program with usually ran in teh late AM hours, the kids ain’t gonna see that.

To make it ‘big’ in amerika, you have to either A: win over the airwaves, or B: tour your ass off (B lead to the sucess of metal bands such as Slayer and Pantera).

Posted on Fri, 30 November 2001 at 08:29

There are no more replies in this discussion. (Go to the homepage)

to post a reply. Sign in if you’re already a member.

You’re viewing replies 1–24 of 24 by 10 people

·

Page: First | Previous | Next | Last

Other discussions started by innocentx

Title Replies Started Last post
top 5 songs ever made 22
top 5 music videos of all time 21
joy division 0  
lost highway by therapy? 8
some help 7

View all 14 discussions started by innocentx.