Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

OCFA reviews please…

#

Started by sull

For all people who had the chance to listen OCFA already…

please share your opinion ! :p

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 11:33

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 157 by 55 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

Tubthumper (Scott) wrote:

Well basically, you’re looking at
a)Music journalists, or
b) The cunts that downloaded it illegally.

I’m hoping there’s very few b’s, especially when it comes to Therapy?

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 12:41

#2

sull wrote:

I’m not restrective!!!

I’m looking for opinion of anyone have heard OCFA.

And secretely I hope there will have many positve posts! ;)

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 13:06

#3

loco wrote:

are music journalists that downloaded it illegally cunts?

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 13:26

#4

Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:

loco wrote:

are music journalists cunts?

:D yep.

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 13:35

#5

loco wrote:

ok, so all people that have listen to OCFA are cunts :D, i hope to become a cunt soon :D

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 13:55

#6

30seconds wrote:

Title: One cure fits all review

This is a preliminary review, Based on about 6 or 7 listens through of the album.

————————————————————

When I heard Therapy? had brought in the helping hand of producer Pedro Ferreira(The Darkness, Tokyo Dragons), I had my doubts, I didn’t want my faviroute band turning all cock rock on us. Thankfully Therapy?’s 11th outing manages to keep faithful to the sound that the fans have stayed loyal to the last few years, but bringing in a cleaner sound that you last heard on High anxiety. ’

The opener on ‘One cure fits all’, ‘Sprung’, is one of the finest openers to a Therapy? album ever to grace our ears. To put it into context of what it sounds like, think A Joy division esque riff being led on a leash by ‘Unbeliever’, and your nearly there.

As the album ploughs on in typical T? fashion, the quality dips a little. While there is no doubt that ‘Deluded son’ and ‘Into the light’ are great tunes, they suffer the same fate that High anxiety went through, just being mere throw-away rock songs.

One thing that bothers me a little in the album, is that Neil’s excellent drumming is lost under the swathe of Andys Guitar, For example, at one point the guitars drown out the drumming.

A real strong point of the album comes in the form of Andys guitar playing and the intricate riffs that he produces. ‘Lose it all’ features an experimental mid section that would fit perfectly in ‘Troublegum’, while ‘Unconsoled’ brings in the trademark T? monster guitar riff in the chorus.

One of the low points in the album debuts at track six,’Dopamine, Seratonin, Adrenaline’. While the track features lyrics that are more than praiseworthy, and it features a welcome return of samples, the song ultimately sounds like a dated 80’s metal song, which should be left in the past(Take note Pedro). In all honesty the song is about as exciting as taking a dump in a Cardboard box*.

Well explored ideas and a car crash groove are included in ‘Our white noise’, an album highlight. While this is all well and good, the production strips the song of its’s potential energy. which is a shame because the song is so perfectly formed.

This leads me onto one of the few criticisms on the album. Pedro’s production: Therapy? sound so clean and lifeless on this album, and it almost veers towards the MOR stadium rock territory in some of the songs. This is a shame for me, as its predecessor highlighted the rough and dirty sound that T? are so good at. There are so many points on this album that could be built up into fist-pumping moments of rock and roll, but the production strips the album of this. Hopefully the songs will transcend better live.

The first release from the irish Noisemongers 11th opus is ‘Rain hits concrete’, which features the lyrics “Can you feel it” above a fantasticly infectious groove. The chorus lacks slightly, like many of the tracks off the album, but the juxtaposed Guitar and drums easily redeem it.

Did you like ‘Stand in line’? If so, the n ‘Fear of god’ will impress you immensley. A beast of a song that pulls you along by the neck taking no prisoners, sounding like Metallica if they were to lose their collective egos.

‘Hearbeat hits’ may not strike you as an album highlight on your first listen, but give it a chance and it shines, despite Andy’s vocals and lyrics being less than impressive. The song boasts an interesting insrumental section while Neil pounds his drums as if someone had just spilt his pint in his local.

The album closer ‘Walk through darkness’ includes an abundance of Major chords which sounds like a three way car crash between ‘Misery’, ‘30 seconds’ and ‘Watch you go’. This works well, unlike ‘Last one to heavens a loser’ as an album closer on NANE. I love great album closers, and this works so well on ‘One cure fits all’

As an album on a whole, it doesn’t stop for anyone, there is hardly a moment to take a breath. Its like a Roller coaster, it has its ups and downs, but It remains safe to the Therapy? sound. The production cuts away the energy that could have made the album something special, and the clean sound doesn’t really work as much as they would have liked. What works well is the diversity and experimentaion of the guitar work on the album, even if the production makes it sound like its been sprayed with ‘Cillit bang’.

The definitive T? record? No. But what did you expect? What you get is an album full of perfectly formed throwaway rock songs which you expect from the Irish rockers. Whether it will stand up to the test of time remians to be seen, but what I will say is that listening to NANE once again sounds positively refreshing.

A great album in many respects, but next time, ditch the dodgy album cover, and a producer not in touch with modern day rock music.

8/10.

*Not that I know what taking a dump in a box feels like, by the way.

————————————————————-

This is being swiftly deleted off my MP3 player, as I want to save the excitement of listening to ‘Sprung’ on my stereo system for April 24th.
Tell me what you think of the review!

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 13:59

#7

donVutz wrote:

Well written, but it sounds like OCFA may be one of those T? albums that won’t make it to my CD player very often. Didn’t they learn that clean productions suck for the typical T? sound?
I just hope it’s better than this makes me expect it to be.

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 14:17

#8

30seconds wrote:

Its not bad by all means, but Its nothing special, the songs don’t have much depth. I can’t see it being very exciting on its 10th listen. At least NANE had you discovering new things all the time…

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 14:19

#9

buffalo-boy wrote:

Thank God! I’m so bored of hearing crappy production! Whenever i play Therapy? to my friends cos I’m always on about them, they are less than impressed, mainly because they sound done on the cheap. Big production will be much better!

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 14:26

#10

30seconds wrote:

I’d also like to add that the Snare(?) drum used on Troublegum makes a welcome return on a couple of tracks.

Is it snare drum? All I know is its the same drum sound used on Troublegum on two tracks…

Its used on ‘Private nobody’ which harks back to their troublegum days and features a ferocious GY!BE guitar noise in the bridge(?).

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 14:41

#11

Kyle Bovine (Kevin Boyle) wrote:

Hotpress called the album ‘Noisetastic.’ :p

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 15:13

#12

Jobrok wrote:

If the album is so safe, over produced and nothing special… then why did you give it 8/10.

Sounds a fishy…

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 15:55

#13

Taunty Dan wrote:

Jobrok wrote:

If the album is so safe, over produced and nothing special… then why did you give it 8/10.

erm…opinion? :)

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 15:57

#14

30seconds wrote:

Jobrok wrote:

If the album is so safe, over produced and nothing special… then why did you give it 8/10.

They are just niggles, that make the album go down in my estimation.
8/10 means a great album(Its a T? album, come on people!), but not a classic or one of the better T? albums.

8/10 means nothing special(but like I’ve mentioned, still great).There are plenty of good things in the album which I’ve mentioned in my review.

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 15:58

#15

MIKEHELL wrote:

Title: A query…

Folks,
Just wondering if someone could help me out here. Maybe i’ve have got this all wrong(wouldn’t be the first time!) but is this thread for reviews of “OCFA” based on illegally downloaded files?

hehehe…

Mikehellx

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:00

#16

Dermot (The Derm) wrote:

Yeah, I’m a bit worried by that review. Sounds like everything I hated about NANE and High Anxiety is back… too many “throw away rock songs” by far.

I used to love picking apart the lyrics / disjointed drumming / angular geetars of old Therapy?… ah well, I’ll wait ‘til it comes out and see for meself.

PS Yeah, why did you give it 8/10 after that review?

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:01

#17

Dermot (The Derm) wrote:

@MIKEHELL

Yeah, it is. The swine!

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:02

#18

30seconds wrote:

MIKEHELL wrote:

Folks,
Just wondering if someone could help me out here. Maybe i’ve have got this all wrong(wouldn’t be the first time!) but is this thread for reviews of “OCFA” based on illegally downloaded files?

hehehe…

Mikehellx

:p

Yes, Like I said, it was a preliminary review based on a few listens on the downloaded copy.
Can’t wait to get the cd and review it after ‘Sprung’ comes punching out of my stereo.

Thanks for taking the time to read the review everyone, I don’t think there’s too many mistakes…

PS, Mikehell, some of the bass parts are amazing on OCFA!

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:06

#19

30seconds wrote:

Dermot wrote:

PS Yeah, why did you give it 8/10 after that review?

Because, as usual, T? have produced a great rock record, though its debatable whether it will last and become one of the greats!

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:07

#20

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

Haha, the ominous shadow of the Evil Priest looms over to damn the unfaithful! :D

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:09

#21

Dermot (The Derm) wrote:

Yeah, I had to be typing my whinge just as he was posting. Ah well, damnation for me! :D

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:16

#22

30seconds wrote:

Can I just say,
I hope my review wasn’t too critical, I do really like the album from the first listens, perhaps I don’t give the credit it deserves in my review ;)

In comparison to the rest of the albums, I reckon,it’s better than HA, Shameless, SPYF,Babyteeth, Pleasure death and possibly Nurse. I’m sure this will provide much debate over the coming months ;)

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 16:23

#23

Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:

If it’s better then SPYF and HA it will be a classic I can’t wait to hear it but I’ll wait till April 24th and not be an asshole (no offense):D that downloads it illegally ;)

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 17:27

#24

sull wrote:

MIKEHELL wrote:

Folks,
Maybe i’ve have got this all wrong(wouldn’t be the first time!) but is this thread for reviews of “OCFA” based on illegally downloaded files?

hehehe…

Mikehellx

:(

Oupsss! Sorry I’m coufused…but my wish was not to review only opinion of “serial-downloader”.

I have just believed that somebody could have listen to OCFA lequally (or not…it’s true), or read some reviews and share his information with us, poor therapy fans who become crazy to wait for this new release!!!

Excuse me again if my idea offened the band.

cheers

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 17:28

#25

Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:

sull Offical reviews of the album will come next month and I’m sure Rene will upload them to the site as soon as he gets them.

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 17:32

#26

silverginger5 wrote:

Man that review scared me slightly, I know its an honest one and the reviewer obviously still really likes the album but its fairly critical. I’m sure it will still rock in my opinion. Its got to, its Therapy? for gods sake.

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 18:09

#27

josepholney wrote:

MIKEHELL wrote:

Folks,
Just wondering if someone could help me out here. Maybe i’ve have got this all wrong(wouldn’t be the first time!) but is this thread for reviews of “OCFA” based on illegally downloaded files?

hehehe…

Mikehellx

AHHHHH RUMBLED!!!!!

That’s priceless…

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 18:13

#28

Fordonian wrote:

Priceless? Does it start with;

“Payment for internet connection to log on and steal a bands unreleased music…£25…”

:D

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 18:40

#29

Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:

Heysatan wrote:

“Payment for internet connection to log on and steal a bands unreleased music…£25…”

Seeing the cunt get caught by the bass player Priceless :D

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 18:44

#30

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

Hahah, for everything else there’s Mastercard.

Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 19:02

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 157 by 55 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.