OCFA reviews please…
Started by sull in General Therapy? Topics on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 11:33
Unbeliever wrote:
Someone gave me a promo of OCFA (and it was not me who put it on the internet). First I had a promo CD with Sprung on it, which gave me great expectations for the rest of the album. When I got the album I was really excited and I couldn’t wait to get home and crank it in my stereo. With Sprung I instantly loved the track, just like I had with Church of Noise or Stories. But the rest of the album didn’t hit me the same right away. As I listen to it more I start to like some songs better, but in some songs the repeats of lines in the choruses can’t really hold my attention. This never happened to me with songs like Straight Life, Turn or Disgracelands, which have the same. I like: Deluded Son, Lose it all, Dopamine seratonin, adrenaline, Rain hits concrete, Fear of god and Walk through darkness. But what I hoped for after hearing Sprung is not really there. But still, there are definately great songs on it!
Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 20:22
Unbeliever wrote:
Actually I did that on purpose, ‘cause I’m not so deep in the new material yet :)
Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 20:31
up_in_flames (Tom) wrote:
1) I’m a cunt and downloaded the album.
2) I will buy it the day it is released.
3) Gave it some spins by now, and I think some songs will grow on me, some won’t - I’m especially reffering to ‘Into The Light’, as I forced myself to listen to it repeatedly, but constantly find myself skipping it. Surely the album has some great tracks and many big riffs, but it doesn’t match up to NANE imho, which is one of my favourite t? albums.
4) (And worst from my point of view): What happend with the mix? I played the album through my pc speakers, on my zen and on my high end stereo and I hardly can’t hear ANY drums. Sure, Neil plays some quality stuff again,but it’s all hidden behind the guitar and andy’s voice. that spoils the fun a bit for me.
All in all I rate it 6/10. On the upside mike’s bass-lines kick ass (generally and in the mix)
I’ll wait for the retail version of the album till I give a final verdict, but I guess not much will change.
Still I’m looking forward to hear the new stuff live, and actually HEAR the drumming.
Posted on Mon, 27 March 2006 at 22:23
Eyesore wrote:
I will likely review it for metalreviews.com. Some of the board members can get a little pissy about non-metal reviews, but I don’t care.
As for the CD, I haven’t been able to find it so it’s not everywhere. Of course, I don’t download much so I basically have Soulseek and Kerrazy Torrents and it’s not there. Good news?
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 05:46
Idlevice2 wrote:
30seconds wrote:
Yes, Like I said, it was a preliminary review based on a few listens on the downloaded copy.
Umm… do you think that’s why it sounds so sterile, and why Andy’s guitar would be drowning out the drums in places? It’ll be compressed to death, not to mention quality loss in the transfer. I dn’t think we can take any production-based qualms seriously until we hear the real version.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 11:25
tsk tsk wrote:
Title: ‘reviews’
Firstly i’m a bit surprised someone ‘reviewing’ a bootleg copy of a yet to be released album and then to criticise the production is like an art critic reviewing a photocopy of the Mona Lisa and saying the colours were a bit faded!
Are you all the type of people who like spoiling movie and book endings for other people? The only thing i see to be gained is some kind of lame ‘i had it first kudos’. In other words “grow up” and leave that shit to the playground.
Secondly i think it’s odd for people to openly advertise the fact that the new album is available for free. This won’t help the bands because we know most people aren’t as honest as our illustrious ‘reviewers’ I think the band are more than respectful and fair to their fans…always reply to emails (i got a signed photo for a friends birthday!), posting diaries and interesting music/photos etc on the site. I don’t think most bands are so honest and readily accessible…of course this means that a few people will get too ‘over familiar’ and start to behave in a disrespectful way. This is exactly what i feel has happened here…
Fair play to MIkehell for calling 30 Sec bluff..he should be ashamed of himself and seems to be what will all those follow up creepy posts. If he thought the bass was so great on the album then why didnt he mention it in his original review?
Therapy? don’t need fans like this now, they need support and help with getting the word out about their new music and tours. That’s what i ( and i know many others) will be doing come April 24th and at as many ofthe forthcoming shows as i can NOT creeping around the net illegally
downloading shitty quality mp3’s and then writing reviews as if i work for Rolling Stone
magazine.
Come on people…lets show some solidarity and respect!
The big Yin
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 12:50
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Title: Andy’s tuppence
Andy asked us to post his response to this thread:
“Here’s a review for you. Therapy? have worked their asses of against strict budget and deadline schedules to come up with their latest album. We’ve busted a gut and cut every (personal) financial corner there is to make an honest and soaring record.
This is an important year for us the last two albums on Spitfire have used stealth to crawl back under the borders of the Rock buying audiences radar and thanks to your support have gotten us a foothold back in the rock buying public, however this album is the important one as it will in someway decide if we improve on our position or slip back into relative obscurity.
It’s important for all involved that this record reaches as many people as possible.
I’m fully aware that in these times copies will without fail make themselves available for downloading. That is just a fact of life but i’m also confident that many impatient fans who download the album will also buy it when it comes out. What troubles me however is the certain people who download it for free illegally and then within 24hrs post negative reviews.
Our records change sound/ approach with every release. If i had a pound for every person that told me they hated NANE, Infernal Love when they first heard them but now love them i’d be a rich man. Surely it would be healthier to reserve judgement until later or at least until the album ‘officially’ comes out and then you can join in with members of the printed press some of whom, in time honoured fashion, are only too glad to have a pop at the band.
One Cure Fits All was a labour of love for us and to us personally it means a lot.
Regarding the downloading, fair enough if you download and also buy the album when it’s released but if you live with the free download for 3 weeks before, slag it off and then spend the money on buying Tool/Pearl Jam/Ministry/ Satyricon or any other big release that week instead of Therapy? thinking ‘i’ve got it for free, why should i buy it?’ then you’re not supporting the band and you truly are a cunt.
By the way, after paying for recording/studios/mixing/producers Therapy? did not make a single penny from this records advance.
If after buying OCFA you don’t like it then that’s your prerogative and you can take it back/exchange it/reverse over it in your car until then i’d appreciate any ‘fans’ not trying to unduly influence others in their decision.
Therapy? applauds those who have helped them get back on the musical landscape and we want to repay you all by being there for some time to come, Love and respect, Andy C.”
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 13:14
Lector wrote:
I´ve followed the conversation and wasn´t going to comment any way on this one but…
tsk tsk seems to be the one voice of reason. There´s some good words for everybody to think of. No matter if they downloaded OCFA or not.
Or should I have kept my mouth shut? Too late now.
If someone has something against my sympathy for tsk tsk, E-Mail me. I´m not talking bout the thing here more than this.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 13:19
Tubthumper (Scott) wrote:
I hope now that Andy has posted his point of view that people will respect the band a little more and not bother trying to download the album for free.
As I said in my first post of this thread, those who are downloading this are cunts, and Andy has reiterated this point in his message.
Now that you have the personal opinion of one of the creators of the album you will see how much hard work has gone into the album and not even think of downloading it. Therapy? aren’t the biggest band around, which is why we should support them in any way we can, whether this be buying cds, going to gigs or buying merch.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 14:05
gleb wrote:
Teethgrinder wrote:
Regarding the downloading, fair enough if you download and also buy the album when it’s released but if you live with the free download for 3 weeks before, slag it off and then spend the money on buying Tool/Pearl Jam/Ministry/ Satyricon or any other big release that week instead of Therapy? thinking ‘i’ve got it for free, why should i buy it?’ then you’re not supporting the band and you truly are a cunt.
Pip: partially, dude…partially. I dont believe that anyone here could live with downloaded copy of T? album.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 14:45
Dermot (The Derm) wrote:
I just want to make it clear that even though I said 30 Secs review was worrying, of course I’ll still be buying the album no matter what.
I’ve been postin on these boards for more years than I care to remember and support Therapy? like a football team ie through thick and thin. I hope that every other WOMble does the same
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 14:47
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
gleb wrote:
Pip: partially, dude…partially. I dont believe that anyone here could live with downloaded copy of T? album.
Not here but people that aren’t as big fans of T? as us will, bands should have control of who disributes there music not any arsehole behind a keyboard.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 14:52
buffalo-boy wrote:
I think Mr Cairns has summed up this one rather nicely!
I’m marking 24th April on my calender =- whoo! :)
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 15:01
gleb wrote:
Pip wrote:
Not here but people that aren’t as big fans of T? as us will, bands should have control of who disributes there music not any arsehole behind a keyboard.
This is the freedom of choice at work, my friend.
There always will be cunts that dont care and wont buy ANY cd. They will download or copy them.
Lets not forget about people that simply cannot afford to spend 20 euros on one. For almost 7 years all i could buy was crappy pirate cassettes and only 5 years ago i could buy all original T? albums from my local record shop.
My point is, if the person really likes record he/she will buy it eventually. No doubt.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 15:09
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
If people can afford an Internet connection they can afford a 20 euro cd if you weren’t able to get the offical album you should have asked your local record store to order it in for you, people will make up any excuse not to part with there money It’s a basic human instinct Greed and I get really pissed off with people like that not :mad: that I’m pissed off with you
Yet…
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 15:27
gleb wrote:
Well, i might went a bit offtopic but i meant piracy in general.
I do belive that those pirate cds and cassettes they sell in Moscow are made from downloaded from internet mp3s. And i do believe that T? album is available there right now. I remember buying one cassette before its official release.
Greedy people shouldnt be your or anyone else’s consern. You take mp3s from them - they’ll start copying cds with their pcs or stereo sytems. You take pcs and stereos from them - they’ll just stop listening to any music. They are not cd buyers INITIALLY.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 15:38
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
Heres the general piracy thread
http://therapyquestionmark.co.uk/wallofmouths/showthread.php?s=&a … genumber=3
I’ll continue this chat there if you interested post on it if you are.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 15:50
aidan01 wrote:
Well for those who just lurrrrrrrrve to download stuff!! Don’t forget the download EP out on april 10th to tide you over til the 24th!!
And for fux sake pay for it!! It’s tough enough to survive in a band without the piracy!!! Just think.. your free download could mean the lads have to get a day job!! Live with that! :p
=======================
Download Ep April 10th
Wednesday, Mar 22nd, 2006
“Rain Hits Concrete” will be issued as a download single on 10th April 2006 and will feature 3 exclusive(non album) songs plus downloadable artwork. Full track listing is
1.Rain Hits Concrete
2.Crazy Cocaine Eyes
3.Hard Work Hope
4.Play On
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 16:40
MarkoJii (Ukko Perkele) wrote:
I’m backing up Lector here, tsk tsk post has good points!
I don’t want to ruin my fun with OFCA before I haven’t heard a single note from the album. I think that reviews are like opinions and opinions are like assholes, everyone’s got one.
Besides nearly every review of T? albums makes me mad because the reviewer starts it like this; “This band hasn’t done anything after Troublegum and I thought they broke up years ago”. That pisses me off.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 16:41
30seconds wrote:
In response To Andys comments earlier:
I do apologise if my review offended the band, the label or any of the fans here. I understand that you need all the support you can get with this album,and you put alot of effort in, I suppose I was a bit too eager to download the album and hear what it sounded like.
I, as well many of the fans, have bought every album from T?, and most other releases too. I even bought the Rock you monkeys download to support the band! Of course, I’ve pre-ordered and payed for the album, And I was more than a bit curious to hear what it sounded like. I wrote the review just to express an opinion on what it sounded like, Not to slate it, and certainly not to try and influence peoples decision in buying the album. To imply that I would try and sway peoples decision, and consequently bring down T?, worries me. The fact that you think that a fan who had bought every album and many other releases would try and stop people from buying T?’s latest opus is quite disheartening. Almost all the people on here are adults who are able to form their own opinion,who won’t be put off in buying the album after my unprofessional review!
My review wasn’t particuarly negative, I felt an 8/10 was justified and was backed up by some constructive criticism. There are plenty of good points about the album, and I did say it was a preliminary review, and I’d wait until the final copy was released into the general public before I’d give my real opinion on the album.
Once again, I aplogise if my opinion offended anyone, If you feel my review will damage the band then please don’t hesitate in taking the review down, but I was merely expressing my opinion.
And In response to the public CONDEMMING of me downloading the album(which I’ve already payed for, by the way) and reviewing it, I don’t think it was nescecary to call me offensive names like ‘Cunt’ and ‘Asshole’. I was only expressing my opinion about the album, and if It offended you in any way then please ask to take my review down. I do feel singled out here as there have been plenty of other fans who have taken a sneak PEEK of the album. I know this through the amount of emails requesting the name of the torrent site.
I’ve preordered my copy of OCFA, and cant wait to recieve the final copy!
Thanks,
Ben
xxx
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 16:44
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
Apology accepted I wasn’t singling you out It was in my opinion a collective statement for all the c@#!s that downloaded it illegally (which annoys the hell out of me by the way:mad: ) The review wasn’t that bad but the way you obtained the album was in my opinion.
But you have a good point your intitled to express your opinion
Long Live Freedom of Speech:)
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 16:58
Eyesore wrote:
Quote (author unknown):
What troubles me however is the certain people who download it for free illegally and then within 24hrs post negative reviews.
This is what drives me INSANE about people! How the fuck can you complain about something you essentially stole? Ridiculous.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 17:31
kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:
Everybody to the shops on the 24th of april! I bet every fan has got that 20 in their wallet then! Like Lemmy says of every MH record at their gigs: I you haven´t bought it already, go on and steal it:) And he doesn´t mean any downloading with that stealing:)
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 17:43
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
30seconds wrote:
And In response to the public CONDEMMING of me downloading the album(which I’ve already payed for, by the way) and reviewing it, I don’t think it was nescecary to call me offensive names like ‘Cunt’ and ‘Asshole’. I was only expressing my opinion about the album, and if It offended you in any way then please ask to take my review down. I do feel singled out here as there have been plenty of other fans who have taken a sneak PEEK of the album. I know this through the amount of emails requesting the name of the torrent site.
I’ve preordered my copy of OCFA, and cant wait to recieve the final copy!
Thanks,
Ben
xxx
Well said! Do I have to post a jpeg of myself with the CD and a online reciept showing I’ve actually payed for the CD? Cunt is still a strong word to many.
Posted on Tue, 28 March 2006 at 18:32
Create a free account and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.