#361
Charlie wrote:
:D meh. Unconsoled is worse !
Posted on Sat, 8 July 2006 at 17:06
#362
The one and only Y wrote:
Unconsoled is worse, too!!! :D
Posted on Sat, 8 July 2006 at 17:11
#363
kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:
Squall wrote:
I never tell people to shut up if they dont like what i like :)
If you dont like oasis, fine, I do. :)
People here have a problem with me liking oasis ?
And they tell me about it every chance they get ?
And i’m not allowed to make my opinions heard ?
Hypocrites. :)
Oasis: I like it too, the first two albums are excellent, then something happened to those Gallagher bros:(
Unconsoled: what an excellent song! Great lyrics with sad melodies! Play it loud every morning when you go to work or school:) maby it “opens” then to you..
Posted on Sat, 8 July 2006 at 18:17
#364
Charlie wrote:
Oasis : First two : Great
Beer here now : not Great
Shoulder of giants : worse
Heathen Chemistry : bit better
Dont believe the truth : Great.
Posted on Sat, 8 July 2006 at 19:05
#365
Billy Blue wrote:
I thought we were having a discussion about music, not the mindless warblings of Oasis. When they were successful it was due to at least 75% image and what is the point in that? Oasis stand for pretty much everything that is wrong with the music industry (well maybe not as bad as Coldplay but pretty bad).
By bringing up Oasis you’ve made me look like the small minded wanker, but I don’t care really. Oasis aren’t even worth talking about. Why don’t you go and talk with some Indie tossers somewhere else about which band member has punched which photographer and slept with what celebrity somewhere else if that’s what floats your boat.
Therapy? & Oasis = Binary opposites.
Posted on Sun, 9 July 2006 at 00:07
#366
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
Yea so anyway, still particular faves off OCFA:
Our White Noise, Unconsoled, Walk Through Darkness, Deluded Son, Lose It All, Heart Beat Hits and Rain Hits Concrete.
I think Oasis are nothing special and never have been in my opinion, and should this kind of topic be mentioned in a different thread…?
Posted on Sun, 9 July 2006 at 02:46
#367
Charlie wrote:
Billy Blue wrote:
. Why don’t you go and talk with some Indie tossers somewhere else about which band member has punched which photographer and slept with what celebrity somewhere else if that’s what floats your boat.
Therapy? & Oasis = Binary opposites.
:) And you thought *I* insulted people about their tastes in music ?
Oasis are everything thats wrong with the music industry ?
What about Pete Doherty ?
What about signing every band that comes along that looks and sounds the same to make money…
” The ” bands…
In My opinion, Oasis have 3 great albums.
Ask most people, they will say ” oh I suppose they have some good tunes but Liam is a wanker, Noel’s alright tho ”
And I agree. :)
OCFA : Still growing n me it has to be said - altho I do enjoy a spin every now and then. Still Can’t listen to Deluded Son.
Posted on Sun, 9 July 2006 at 08:26
#368
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
andys gibson sg wrote:
should this kind of topic be mentioned in a different thread…?
Agreed. All Oasis ramblings in here please.
Posted on Sun, 9 July 2006 at 08:56
#369
buffalo-boy wrote:
who slagged off ‘Into The Light’??
IMO its one of the best songs on there! ;)
Posted on Mon, 10 July 2006 at 08:19
#370
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Agreed. Let’s round up a posse and find ‘em!
Posted on Mon, 10 July 2006 at 09:55
#371
Billy Blue wrote:
Squall wrote:
Oasis are everything thats wrong with the music industry ?
What about Pete Doherty ?
Good point. However, you have made the mistake of suggesting Doherty has nothing but a negative impact on music, and then compared him with Oasis. Case closed.
Posted on Mon, 10 July 2006 at 11:18
#372
Dennis wrote:
Billy Blue wrote:
Oasis aren’t even worth talking about. Why don’t you go and talk with some Indie tossers somewhere else
Way to go stereotyping people!
I like some of Oasis’ early stuff, so, what, I am an Indie Tosser am I?
get over it!
Posted on Mon, 10 July 2006 at 12:06
#373
30seconds wrote:
“indie tossers”.
Proof of the arrogance and misguided views of other forms of music that much of the metal community embraces. Grow up.
Posted on Mon, 10 July 2006 at 12:51
#374
Charlie wrote:
Billy Blue wrote:
Good point. However, you have made the mistake of suggesting Doherty has nothing but a negative impact on music, and then compared him with Oasis. Case closed.
So you’re saying by comparing him to oasis, and saying that he only has a negative impact…
Yuo’re saying oasis are therefore good :D:D
Posted on Mon, 10 July 2006 at 13:02
#375
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
Title: message to therapy? (merged)
pleeeeeeeeeeeese bring back either chris sheldon or pete bartlett for the next album, and get rid of the useles pedro ferreira, the drums are terrible, there are cracking songs on the album let down by appaling production, please consider this, thank you :)
Posted on Wed, 16 August 2006 at 02:10
#376
ziggy (Ziggy Buyle) wrote:
The new album is kinda boring :(
I think it’s one of the worst of T? It’s still good but the otherones are better
They repeat to much
Posted on Wed, 16 August 2006 at 07:24
#377
Sully wrote:
It’s a good album but it’s not a brilliant album. The mix is well fucked but I still listen to it a couple of times a week. I mean fucking hell, i listen to some of the worst recorded punk you’ve ever heard and OCFA is not that bad compared to that stuff. I suppose people just expected more from them.
Some of the songs were awesome live though and i’d like Walk Through Darkness and DSA to stay in the set for years to come.
Posted on Wed, 16 August 2006 at 09:45
#378
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
Yea I still have some solid favourites from OCFA. Imagine the impact if we had it instead of Troublegum…?
Posted on Wed, 16 August 2006 at 13:00
#379
josepholney wrote:
Graeme55? wrote:
pleeeeeeeeeeeese bring back either chris sheldon or pete bartlett for the next album, and get rid of the useles pedro ferreira, the drums are terrible, there are cracking songs on the album let down by appaling production, please consider this, thank you :)
I couldn’t agree more; Chris Sheldon definitely made the Therapy sound that I hear in my head whenever I think of the band. But I don’t think the production is at all bad on OFCA, it’s just a bit of a change in direction in song wirting.
Posted on Wed, 16 August 2006 at 14:14
#380
buffalo-boy wrote:
i don’t get it - i thought the production job was really big sounding. i like it! ;)
Posted on Fri, 18 August 2006 at 08:21
#381
suicidalmaniac wrote:
…don’t like it. No, sir! Have to say, I expected it to sound more like those old time favorites… Oh well.
Posted on Fri, 18 August 2006 at 08:57
#382
The one and only Y wrote:
Although the record is terrible, I think we need more singles!
Posted on Fri, 18 August 2006 at 19:38
#383
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
Ok I most be the only one who likes Shameless and OCFA then ;)
Posted on Fri, 18 August 2006 at 19:58
#384
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
i like shameless, and ocfa
Posted on Sat, 19 August 2006 at 00:12
#385
The one and only Y wrote:
Posted on Sat, 19 August 2006 at 09:40
#386
Edz wrote:
Graeme55? wrote:
i like shameless, and ocfa
Always thought Shamless was about the weakest of all T? releases, but then all their albums have good things going for them, to a greater or lesser extent, so that’s not being too harsh… Personally I love OCFA … because it’s an album full of good songs - there’s only a couple that head towards “filler” territory - and it’s an album that benefits from listening to as a whole; from “Sprung” which gives you everything you want in an opening - full - track (fills you with adrelalin, sends fingers up yer spine, puts a big melon-slice grin on yer gob … starts proceedings with a BANG) through to Walk Through Darkness with it’s unexpected ending (Jake Burns would surely have KILLED to write a track like this … sounds more like SLF than they do themselves).
But above all I like it ‘cos it’s resonant throughout of all T? eras - there’s the BIG sound of more recent releases (and “Troublegum”), AND touches of the sparseness of earlier releases (I love the middle parts of Lose It All) and the more brutal stuff on Suicide Pact (I love that album). The influences are clear too, too many to mention but Killing Joke and Joy Division come to mind … but above all T? manage to incorporate so many sounds and yet still sound utterly distinctive, which is what I love about this band the best!!!
Posted on Sat, 19 August 2006 at 13:26
#387
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
Posted on Sat, 19 August 2006 at 19:24
#388
buffalo-boy wrote:
Edz wrote:
(Jake Burns would surely have KILLED to write a track like this … sounds more like SLF than they do themselves).
Scary… SLF lost it years ago! Anyone heard Get A Life? Poor album!
Posted on Wed, 23 August 2006 at 13:31
#389
Gimme Back My Brainsaw wrote:
SLF are class, *you cant say crap on the radio*
Posted on Wed, 23 August 2006 at 13:46
#390
Edz wrote:
buffalo-boy wrote:
Scary… SLF lost it years ago! Anyone heard Get A Life? Poor album!
Indeed, my point entirely. “Walk through Darkness” sounds like vintage SLF, the like of which we haven’t heard in a while. Thought “Flags and Emblems” (and “Get a Life”) were so-so, but admittedly the most recent lot of SLF albums have been seriously lacking…
Posted on Thu, 24 August 2006 at 17:43
