Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

Lonely Cryin’ Only.. Re-recording?

#

Started by Fuzzeh (Jack) in General Therapy? Topics

Great song, beautiful, one of their best, best song eva, etc.

But I remember reading in the last year on this site that Andy was dissapointed with the song and it didn’t come out the way he (originally?) intended which suprised me somewhat. (Not like say Loose or Nowhere.)

Do you think now the band are in a stable position and (In my humble opinion) a very good position that they could consider re-recording or producing, or even writing the song?

PS - I’ll try and find his comments later on.

Posted on Fri, 13 October 2006 at 22:22

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 40 by 20 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

gapu wrote:

strange, from what i’ve heard… he doesnt even like the song! i mean, nowadays

Posted on Sat, 14 October 2006 at 07:45

#2

Shade wrote:

Maybe he’s liking it again now that it’s in the special studio-live session and the current touring schedule. Or, perhaps that’s a sign he appreciates it again. Whichever it is, fans of the song will find this a reason to cheer.

Personally, I’m not one of them.. though I can see it could be a good song. Perhaps it’s improved a lot now - I wouldn’t know. :)

Posted on Sat, 14 October 2006 at 08:32

#3

Fuzzeh (Jack) wrote:

I think the reason he doesn’t like it is similar to “my voodoo doll” .. executed wrongly and didn’t sound like t? to andy yet he liked the potential, lyrics and vocal melody.

Posted on Sat, 14 October 2006 at 10:00

#4

Superunknown wrote:

Fuzzeh wrote:

Andy was dissapointed with the song and it didn’t come out the way he (originally?) intended which suprised me somewhat. (Not like say Loose or Nowhere.)

What do you mean? That it doesn’t surprise you that Andy doesn’t like Loose or Nowhere or that those two songs “came out” exactly the way they should? Confused I am.

Posted on Sat, 14 October 2006 at 11:15

#5

Fuzzeh (Jack) wrote:

Nononononono. :P

He thinks nowhere and loose are 2 of their best songs (and rightly so) and I think he wishes lonely cryin’ only (in his opinion not mine) came out the same way.

Posted on Sun, 15 October 2006 at 13:58

#6

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think they would be better off re-producing Nurse and releasing it again.

Like The Manics did with their reissues and give Nurse a big fuck off rock production! It could certainly use it! ;)

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 07:59

#7

fatboy wrote:

Well said Buffalo Boy.

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 10:49

#8

KJC Dublin (Karl) wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think they would be better off re-producing Nurse and releasing it again.

Like The Manics did with their reissues and give Nurse a big fuck off rock production! It could certainly use it! ;)

a big fucking “Yay” to that, that would be grrrrreeeeaaat!

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 11:56

#9

buffalo-boy wrote:

I had a good idea?

Cool! :cool:

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 11:57

#10

The one and only Y wrote:

Yeah!

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 15:30

#11

The one and only Y wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think they would be better off re-producing Nurse and releasing it again.

Like The Manics did with their reissues and give Nurse a big fuck off rock production! It could certainly use it! ;)

I meant THAT

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 15:31

#12

Dermot (The Derm) wrote:

buffalo-boy wrote:

I think they would be better off re-producing Nurse and releasing it again.

Like The Manics did with their reissues and give Nurse a big fuck off rock production! It could certainly use it! ;)

That would be amazing

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 15:52

#13

ziggy (Ziggy Buyle) wrote:

Yes indeed!

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 17:19

#14

Fuzzeh (Jack) wrote:

I agree and have innocent x as a bonus track for rave fun.

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 17:20

#15

andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:

Hey does anyone feel the recording of the excellent ‘Nurse’ came out a tad bit ummm… quiet?

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 19:39

#16

josepholney wrote:

YES totally, hence why I remastered it for my own purposes!!

It sounds much better with a bit more bass in the mix; and I’m normally someone who would rarely turn the bass UP, but it’s lacking on nurse.

Joe.

Posted on Mon, 16 October 2006 at 22:26

#17

buffalo-boy wrote:

andys gibson sg wrote:

Hey does anyone feel the recording of the excellent ‘Nurse’ came out a tad bit ummm… quiet?

I think the guitars could do with a boost - its a twisted indie rock record with dub bass and rave influences with indie shoegazer production!

Posted on Tue, 17 October 2006 at 08:08

#18

Christian wrote:

andys gibson sg wrote:

Hey does anyone feel the recording of the excellent ‘Nurse’ came out a tad bit ummm… quiet?

No, Andy has said the same. Production could have been better, sound was too “thin”.

Posted on Thu, 19 October 2006 at 16:36

#19

Christian wrote:

That should be a “Yes” instead of a “No” of course :rolleyes:

Posted on Thu, 19 October 2006 at 19:28

#20

buffalo-boy wrote:

What are the chances of this happening do you think? Maybe if enough WOM’s get behind the idea the old record label will let them buy the album out then they can do what they want with it. :)

Posted on Fri, 20 October 2006 at 07:27

#21

soul doubt (an) wrote:

According to Andy, Spitfire has just bought the rights to the SP-YF album, …
So maybe if that’s a succes…

Posted on Fri, 20 October 2006 at 07:40

#22

buffalo-boy wrote:

really? didn’t know that, cool!

Posted on Fri, 20 October 2006 at 13:51

#23

Bad Karma wrote:

soul doubt wrote:

According to Andy, Spitfire has just bought the rights to the SP-YF album, …
So maybe if that’s a succes…

Did Andy say that at a gig or in an interview?

Posted on Sun, 22 October 2006 at 17:34

#24

Evilbeast (Dany Brillant) wrote:

he may have told us that after the gig in Paris when we met him…but i’m not sure.but I clearly remember we talked about SP-YF,but can’t remember all the details of this conversation.

Posted on Sun, 22 October 2006 at 17:41

#25

soul doubt (an) wrote:

Yes, indeed after the gig, and he wasn’t drunk yet :p

Posted on Mon, 23 October 2006 at 07:28

#26

buffalo-boy wrote:

tell them to sort the vocals out before re-releasing it!

I was scared when I first heard them…garuanteed to terrify children! :)

Posted on Mon, 23 October 2006 at 07:48

#27

soul doubt (an) wrote:

nothing’s wrong with the vocals …

Posted on Mon, 23 October 2006 at 08:03

#28

buffalo-boy wrote:

I know… i was jokily saying that they were scary! Which they are!

God Bless You

Posted on Mon, 23 October 2006 at 08:08

#29

Shade wrote:

Does that mean a rerelease under Spitfire is imminent? And if so, will there be unreleased bonustracks that will shock the very foundations of the earth?

Probably not, but, sometimes the cane’s sugar, other times it’s a tool to rest on and beat vigilant muggers with.

Posted on Mon, 23 October 2006 at 08:11

#30

soul doubt (an) wrote:

According to what Andy said there would be some unreleased tracks on it, and possibly an other VERY NICE surprice… I just don’t want to spoil this… :p

Posted on Mon, 23 October 2006 at 08:14

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 40 by 20 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.