Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

a question to Ixx.

#

Started by Ronald

Ok, I always wonder what has made people log on to messageboards and insult other users or bands by swearing with terrible diseases and stuff. I remember that The Official messageboard( the orange one with blue letters) was closed down back then because of people like that.So…what was your reason?

And I don’t mind your return because criticism is fair enough and you seem to show respect for other people now…

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 07:59

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 41 by 16 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

Paddy wrote:

My view exactly, if he know longer likes T? why dont he fuck off and leave this site for the people who do.

Typical fucking American, shoving his nose in where its not wanted. Is he George W Bush by any chance lol.

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 09:57

#2

Michael wrote:

He hasn’t been insulting anyone now, so he’s more than welcome I’d say, I’m always ready for a good discussion!

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 11:56

#3

mfgeorge wrote:

Paddy wrote:

My view exactly, if he know longer likes T? why dont he fuck off and leave this site for the people who do.

Typical fucking American, shoving his nose in where its not wanted. Is he George W Bush by any chance lol.

hey paddy, chill out for a second… is it not possible to like a bands older material but not there new stuff? if i liked old metallica, but not there new stuff, do i know still have a right to go to a metallica board? and while i’m there do i not have the right to say that i don’t enjoy the new albums?

ixx hasn’t bad-mouthed you or anyone else since he’s been back… he’s making, and taking part in, discussions on the board… this is a therapy? board and he’s talking about therapy?, so what’s the problem… you weren’t even on the board when he was around the first time, and everyone deserves a second chance, so let’s all be cool and i’m sure everything will be ok…

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 13:39

#4

Paddy wrote:

OK OK I apologise, I’m an angry young man thats all.

All my point is is that I havent seen a positive post from ixx, and if he no longer likes anything Therapy? do whats the point in voicing your opinion on it.

Listen to what you do like and forget the rest. I personally think babyteeth is a terrible album so I dont listen to it. Simple as that.

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 14:35

#5

Michael wrote:

Babyteeth is one of my favs, there’s nothing as variable as taste. And I also think Metallica’s earlier stuff is way better than the new stuff.
The fact that ixx doesn’t like the new stuff (I like the pre SP-YF stuff better as well), doesn’t mean he hates Therapy?, only their new sound.

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 14:48

#6

Alan wrote:

Paddy wrote:

I personally think babyteeth is a terrible album so I dont listen to it. Simple as that.

ARRRRRGHHHHHHHH!! Are you mental? Babyteeth is terrible?…

“The path of the righteous man is beset upon…”

and so on…

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 15:14

#7

ixx wrote:

the reason i posted like i did in the past was because i couldn’t believe how some people here thrashed previous albums like troublegum and others that i liked because it was big and said that shameless was much better. i basically had a reaction like alan’s last post..i just didn’t get it…and paddy, you seem to hate americans..good for you. it’s not like you’re the only one. hopefully have a good reason to other than you hate george bush.

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 15:24

#8

Paddy wrote:

Alan,

Sorry will clear this up. Its not the songs themselves that are terrible. Its the recording and production, it sounds like ice cream mixed in a wind tunnel. I’m sure if the boys recorded the songs again they would be good.

Ixx

Generally all the Americans I have met have been wankers> I apologise for making such a sweeping statement but it is true. They seem to have this major aura that they are so much better than everyone else, when basically they are a bag of bollocks. Sorry if I offend !!

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 16:58

#9

Blonde Blade wrote:

Are you sure you’re the same person? You don’t sound too bad to me. :D

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 17:07

#10

ixx wrote:

in reality, i’m actually a good guy.. go figure blonde blade. and paddy… i don’t like how many people i’ve met act either, but i don’t stop at singling out just americans.

Posted on Tue, 5 November 2002 at 17:48

#11

Citizen Erased wrote:

Americans - cultural imperialists
Dutch - pornographic
French - smell of garlic
Australians - pissheads
Scottish - beligerant
Welsh - well, there’s that thing with the sheep

English - oh we’re just soooo perfect… Never done a wrong thing in all our history…

There’s something bad you can say about every nationality, and something good too, but it’s difficult to say ‘all Americans are rubbish’ on the grounds of thhe few you know. For every George Bush (who I admit does come across as a dangerously ignorant and arrogant man), there’s a Michael Moore trying to right things.

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 08:20

#12

White Psycho wrote:

no we’ve never done anything wrong, errrrrrrr except that whole Jewish massacre when they made an offering to king something or other in the 1100s, that whole slave trade thing, india, turning a lot of chinese people into dope fiends so that we could take over, ah well its my country and there is a lot worse

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 15:33

#13

Blonde Blade wrote:

Yeah, just don’t get started on the Manx! :D We are officially the most superior people in the world! (i think it’s due to the isolation and inbreeding)

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 15:47

#14

White Psycho wrote:

well its a bad idea when cousins marry!

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 15:49

#15

ixx wrote:

british royalty have married their own relatives for centuries in order to maintain royalty in their blood just like other countries where royalty existed,..i wouldn’t talk. by the way, if you british hate george bush so much, why are you backing us? because there’s reason to, that’s why. george bush has smart people who tells him how to do things and he just agrees with them and does it. there are a lot of things we don’t know… things aren’t done for no reason. yes america has done things in the past only for their benefit, but so has every other country..including england…the only reason some countries don’t get involved is because they don’t have the power to. if they did, they would

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 15:56

#16

White Psycho wrote:

it explains why royalty is so messed up. Take the British royal family, they’re a bunch of morons, with the exception of william and harry who seem to have some brain cells to rub together.

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 15:58

#17

ixx wrote:

seriously, why don’t you british chop their heads off like almost every other country has done with their kings and get with the times. your royalty is living off the people’s money and they do nothing to earn it.

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 16:02

#18

White Psycho wrote:

we did that a few hundred years ago and christmas got banned. Besides theres the tourism thing

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 16:06

#19

Barbie wrote:

if i knew any of you pretentious little people, I’d give you some money to buy a newspaper.

(then i’d hit you with it.)

Posted on Wed, 6 November 2002 at 20:15

#20

Erk Junior wrote:

What did the king say to the queen when they got divorced?

can we still be cousins?

sooorrrrrrrry had to throw that in!

not only are the aussies pissheads … you can throw in the Irish under that banner

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 02:09

#21

Citizen Erased wrote:

Soooo, if, for argument’s sake, someone had one English parent and one Indian parent, and wouldn’t exist if the British hadn’t done the whole India thing, can that person really condemn the English (which he counts himslef amongst) for the bad things that they did?

Purely hypothetical of course…

And why racism? Why take the pee about people being darker/lighter and then have a huge industry selling tanning/lightening products? Best just to tell those in the middle, those gorgeous olive-skinned people, that they’re lovely…

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 09:13

#22

lucifers Machine wrote:

oh oh! all getting a bit political ain’t we?
and starting to go slightly into national sterotypes.

What Did Ireland Give America For Christmas?

A Culture and some History

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 09:58

#23

Karl wrote:

You make good kippers though BB!!!

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 10:42

#24

Sabotage wrote:

ixx wrote:

seriously, why don’t you british chop their heads off like almost every other country has done with their kings and get with the times. your royalty is living off the people’s money and they do nothing to earn it.

We did chop heads off way back…but when Cromwell died, there was no-one to take over, and they re-instated the monarchy. Parliamentary democracy hadn’t got the firm footing it needed to carry on without Cromwell or Kings and Queens. Which was a pity. If our Civil War had have happened later by a hundred years or so, we may never have felt the need to go back to a Monarchy, but there you go.
I could start to rant quite a lot here, but I’ll go now…

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 12:29

#25

Citizen Erased wrote:

Have you been watching Great Britons by any chance? I missed the Cromwell one (boo) and the Diana one (hooray), but the others were good. Darwin’s still got my vote (my first soft toy that I can remember was named after him - I was an odd child)

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 12:45

#26

Sabotage wrote:

Great Britons is an interesting series.
I saw the IK Brunel and the Cromwell ones.
Missed the rest due to various stuff.
As for Lennon and Diana (rest their souls) being included is quite beyond me.
Lennon wrote some tunes.
Diana wore some dresses.
Big deal.
I don’t want to belittle either of them, and I’m sure they were nice people etc..but come on.
The other 8 in the top 10 have each got a strong case.
My fave being Cromwell.

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 14:23

#27

lucifers Machine wrote:

Cromwell , oh that would be good , what he do mmm lets think go to Ireland chop off a load of Heads , Go back to England Chop off more Heads . Then, chop off some royal heads (bit of a pattern forming?)
Really good if you want a sociopath for the greatest Briton ever.

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 15:32

#28

Karl wrote:

Oh this is cool. Seems to be a lot of us on the message board today. Can’t even remember the original question by IXX.
Like your biography Lucifer!!

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 15:42

#29

Citizen Erased wrote:

Cromwell - sociopath
Nelson - sociopath (and eye for an eye)
Churchill - sociopath (think Boer war and India rather than WWII)
Brunel - sociopath (well, a lot of people died building his tunnel)
Lennon - sociopath by proxie (Charles Manson)
Diana - socialite (close - nearly caused the deaths of hundreds of florists through overwork)
Darwin - postulated on sociopaths (more chopped off heads, less competition)…

Can’t remember the other 3, but there’s probably a pattern developing here.

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 15:54

#30

Sabotage wrote:

lucifers Machine wrote:

Cromwell , oh that would be good , what he do mmm lets think go to Ireland chop off a load of Heads , Go back to England Chop off more Heads . Then, chop off some royal heads (bit of a pattern forming?)
Really good if you want a sociopath for the greatest Briton ever.

Oh he’s no angel that’s for sure.
Apart from Newton and Darwin, everybody in the top 10 killed, or was responsible for death in varying degrees. I’m not counting Di and Lennon here.
Churchill was arrogant and killed many.
IK Brunel’s constructions led to the deaths of 100’s of workers.
Nelson killed many.
Elizabeth I killed many.

blah blah.

But Cromwell did a lot more besides “chop off heads”.
It’s all a bit of a pointless debate anyway.
Not one I’m taking ultra-seriously leastways.
Cheers

Posted on Thu, 7 November 2002 at 16:11

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 41 by 16 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.