#31
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Was it ? FUCK :eek:
* Dennis rushes out to buy a copy of Be Here Now ”
:D
okay I knew that would rattle a few cages. But:
Definitely Maybe or Stone Roses ?
Morning Glory is easily a better second album than Second Coming in terms of delivering.
And i think nobody can deny Be Here Now was easily better than the Seahorses album :D
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:23
#32
Taunty Dan wrote:
Dennis wrote:
Out of the remaining tracks, there’s only Straight To The Man that is what I’d call “poor”.
I think it is a good album, maybe not great or “classic” but still good.
its just weird. How an album can have one of THE greatest singles ever ever ever (“Love spreads”) on it, alongside such indifferent stuff like “your star will shine” is just a mystery. But then they were never gonna top the debut. Absolute genius album that.
But yeah, it pisses on Be Here Now.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:24
#33
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:25
#34
Dennis wrote:
I hate to admit it but I not only own Be Here Now, but I also own the Seahorses album AND Squire’s first solo “effort”.
*hangs head in shame and starts selling CD’s on eBay*
EDIT:
For my money, Oasis began and ended with the excellent Definitely Maybe. Morning Glory is way overrated and if I never hear Wonderwall or Don’t Look Back In Anger ever again it’ll be too soon.
Stone Roses is also a tad overrated but it’s still a classic, of course. Most great records get overrated, I guess.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:26
#35
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Be Here now is a good FUN album :)
Its nowhere near as good as the first two albums, but it wasnt as bad as people made out.
THAT was Standing on the Shoulder of Giants. Their worst album so far.
:D
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:28
#36
Taunty Dan wrote:
Squall wrote:
Definitely Maybe or Stone Roses ?
fucking hell mate, i’d pick the fucking second coming over definitely maybe! Most. Overrated. Album. Of. All. Time.
And you’ve got to remember, you wouldn’t even HAVE oasis without stone roses.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:33
#37
Dennis wrote:
I like the kind of young, naive “us against the world” attitude of Def Maybe, but they are taking the piss to be still trying to get away with it today. Liam at the Brits?
If John Lydon did a Gap advert singing Anarchy In The UK with a backing band he got from a TV reality show it would be less sad.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 15:37
#38
Taunty Dan wrote:
actually, on the subject of the brits, what the FUCK has happened to Liams voice? I love Liam, don’t get me wrong, but jesus christ, what the fuck??
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 16:04
#39
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Cigarettes and alcohol. :D
His ” technique ” cant be very beneficial either.
That said - his voice on the recent album is pretty good.
Mind you - Ian Brown is shocking live !
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 17:38
#40
Taunty Dan wrote:
yeah, ian brown is awful. With liam though, its not like he’s out of tune, he just seems to be barking the words out rather than singing. I thought noel was doing a lot of “papering over the cracks” to be fair.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 19:06
#41
FNYANKEZ wrote:
Quicksand
Fugazi (even though they are technically on hiatus, but c’mon 6 years!)
Jawbox
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 19:27
#42
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Taunty Dan wrote:
yeah, ian brown is awful. With liam though, its not like he’s out of tune, he just seems to be barking the words out rather than singing. I thought noel was doing a lot of “papering over the cracks” to be fair.
Yeah Noel does do a good job.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 20:39
#43
Alex wrote:
hoochalobster wrote:
What’s awesome about hot dogs? *confused*
Hooch, unless that’s some kinda of hip sarcasm that I just don’t understand (bad reference to some band from ages ago), then you are letting Eddie down…
And if you’re still not sure, maybe you need a trip into space.
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 22:35
#44
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Are we talking post-Dress To Kill? Me and Eddie went our separate ways after that. Apologies.
(Are you referring to Ugly Kid Joe btw? Cause if you are, I got that one!)
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 23:25
#45
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
I don’t know what anyone is talking about. :(
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 23:40
#46
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, the worm has turned :p
Posted on Mon, 19 February 2007 at 23:54
#47
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 00:07
#48
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
hoochalobster wrote:
Are we talking post-Dress To Kill? Me and Eddie went our separate ways after that. Apologies.
(Are you referring to Ugly Kid Joe btw? Cause if you are, I got that one!)
Glorious is the best one for my money.
But yeah, What the hell happened after Dress to kill ?
:( :(
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 11:07
#49
viking_pooh wrote:
Much as id love to see Faith No More, Patton aint gonna do it so it would only be Mosely or Courtney ha ha ha ha
but serioulsy aside from ones i already love who are back together (Helmet, Prong, AIC, Will Haven, Kerbdog) id love to see the following reform
Handsome
Carter USM
Earthtone9
Jane’s Addiction (i know they did but i didnt get to see them :( )
One Minute Silence
The Workhorse Movement
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 15:44
#50
Headtransplanter wrote:
Kerbdog back together???
I havent heard that, they’re one of those bands I got into after they split up, because of the new band containing ex-members (in this case Wilt, who weren’t quite as good) strangely that also happened with the Workhorse movement, I heard the Dirty Americans first, although they’re a bit different from WHM to say the least!
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 17:25
#51
Divers (Simon) wrote:
I’m personally not a fan at all but the jam have just reformed.. without Paul Weller?? what’s the fucking point, could anyone pick out the other two out of a line up?
http://www.nme.com/news/26537
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 21:43
#52
Superunknown wrote:
As much as I love Faith No More, a reunion would just be wrong and go against everything Mike Patton has said in the past. So let’s not wish for one of the best bands ever to piss on their legacy.
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 22:14
#53
Alex wrote:
hoochalobster wrote:
Are we talking post-Dress To Kill? Me and Eddie went our separate ways after that. Apologies.
(Are you referring to Ugly Kid Joe btw? Cause if you are, I got that one!)
I don’t know if it is post-Dress To Kill to be honest, but at least you got the very poor Ugly Kid Joe reference :D
Posted on Tue, 20 February 2007 at 23:48
#54
Suz wrote:
Posted on Wed, 21 February 2007 at 00:05
#55
FNYANKEZ wrote:
I’m listening to the old ‘No Life Til Leather’ demo..
I’d like to see the original Metallica lineup!
Kirk doesn’t add much anymore (enough with the Wah Pedal!), bring Dave back in, and see what kind of music they’d create.
Posted on Wed, 21 February 2007 at 21:24
#56
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (fuck democracy) wrote:
bit hard for the original metallica lineup to reform when one of them is dead.
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 11:52
#57
Igor Belanov wrote:
So there’s no chance of Joy Division reforming then?
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 12:46
#58
col wrote:
buffalo-boy wrote:
Voice of the Beehive!
L7
Faith No More
Saw them at Reading festival, maybe on the same bill but can’t remember.
One of the chicks from L7 took out her tampon and threw it in the crowd - rock n roll
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 13:13
#59
Dennis wrote:
Igor Belanov wrote:
So there’s no chance of Joy Division reforming then?
…it would only take three bullets, dude…
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 14:50
#60
Igor Belanov wrote:
Much as the last few New Order albums have been poor, I don’t think they deserve that just yet. After ‘Jetstream’ it might be a bit late, mind you…
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 15:03
