Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

Gaps between albums

#

Started by Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) in Other Bands & Artists

is it just me, or are there far to many artists/bands who take far too long to release studio albums these days,

i mean, metallica are taking 4 years
ozzy osbourne is taking 6 maybe 7 years
tool take 5 years at a time
guns n roses. 16 years and fucking counting!! (what is axl rose doing, having a wank?!)
green day, 4 years

i think they are taking the piss slightly, but if theyre doing other projects then fair enough, i dont see any of the above doing anything else, (except axl rose who seems to be doing nothing at all),

think about it this way, the gap between the album before last to the latest ones, and between the latest albums to the next are getting bigger. who agrees?

Posted on Tue, 27 March 2007 at 17:54

You’re viewing replies 1–26 of 26 by 15 people

·

Page: First | Previous | Next | Last

#1

Taunty Dan wrote:

unfortunately in a lot of cases i don’t think its down to the band. Record companies will bleed dry whatever product they’ve got before sending the band back into the studio. Look at bands like The Killers, 5 singles from one album?! But then the older bands like Metallica really aren’t all about the music anymore, its make album, tour, go home for a couple of years. As for GNR, well…i think Axls gotten himself into an unenviable position: Release album that possibly flops and destroy GNRs (recorded) legacy, or don’t release it and let the legend grow.

But ultimately Graeme yeah, you’re right, its fucking frustrating! Thank god for Lou Barlow! :D

Posted on Tue, 27 March 2007 at 21:36

#2

buffalo-boy wrote:

What Dan said.

I find it weird thaT BANDS DO THAT… DON’T THEY REALISE THAT IN 5 YEARS ALOT OF THEIR FANS GO FROM BEING TEENAGERS to changing and getting on with life and music becomes less important to some people… I don’t supppose a band like Tool cares tho, they’ve made their money. :p

Posted on Wed, 28 March 2007 at 07:16

#3

FNYANKEZ wrote:

The singer from Tool is also in a Perfect Circle, who’ve put out three albums since 2000, so they should get a bit of a pass

Posted on Wed, 28 March 2007 at 17:53

#4

gapu wrote:

in the 70’s bands used to release about 3 albums a year! nowadays it’s terrible.. but think about it, in most cases it are more popular bands who need a lot of time to release a new album!

younger/unfamous bands take about 1,5-2 years till they release any new material

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 08:49

#5

gapu wrote:

many jazz musicians used to record several albums during one year.. they made one for every month of the year.. incredible

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 08:51

#6

soul doubt (an) wrote:

Graeme55? wrote:

i mean, metallica are taking 4 years
ozzy osbourne is taking 6 maybe 7 years
tool take 5 years at a time
guns n roses. 16 years and fucking counting!! (what is axl rose doing, having a wank?!)
green day, 4 years

The first two shouldn’t have released another album, same counts for Gun ‘n’ Roses. As for Tool, the album they released is yet again pure quality, and well worth the long wait. It probably wouldn’t have been so fantastic if they’d release an album every year.

As for Greenday, I’ve nothing against them, but I think it’s good they don’t release too much albums, they all sound pretty much the same

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 09:03

#7

Spaceball 1 wrote:

Graeme55? wrote:

i mean, metallica are taking 4 years

Probably too busy yelling at each other, being in rehab, selling art collection, acting like spoilt kids. They should’ve quit while they were ahead

Graeme55? wrote:

ozzy osbourne is taking 6 maybe 7 years

Let’s see you try working a soundboard or plugging a mic in when you shake so much!

Graeme55? wrote:

tool take 5 years at a time

They do, but then they release top-notch quality records.

Graeme55? wrote:

guns n roses. 16 years and fucking counting!! (what is axl rose doing, having a wank?!)

Probably. Does anyone still care what ol’ plastic face is up to anyway?

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 09:04

#8

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

gapu wrote:

in the 70’s bands used to release about 3 albums a year!

Mmm, that’s the way to do it. ;)

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 10:04

#9

fatboy wrote:

Gone are the days when bands released an album a year. Be lucky if a band releases an album every two years these days.

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 15:55

#10

gapu wrote:

Misanthropologist wrote:

Mmm, that’s the way to do it. ;)

:)

well, but you have to think, in those days they released everything on vinyl. a album was not longer that about 30minutes. it was probably shorter than that!
i can imagine that bands used some recorded songs for the next record, as well. why not?

nowadays, a album should approximately 50minutes long. at least that’s what many people think… i don’t really care about that, as long as the quality is good! many of my favourite bands have albums under 40 minutes.

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 17:07

#11

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

True enough. And as much as I love John Lee Hooker, I suspect a great many of the songs on those albums sounded the same. ;)

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 17:20

#12

Charlie wrote:

I am prepared to wait as long as it takes for the next Green Day album :)

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 17:25

#13

gapu wrote:

Misanthropologist wrote:

True enough. And as much as I love John Lee Hooker, I suspect a great many of the songs on those albums sounded the same. ;)

i like some JLH stuff too :)
although i didn’t know he’s already dead :(

i once bought a 2cd compilation, but the quality is so fucked up, that i can’t really listen to it. it’s always the same with these moneymaker-albums by old artists… you know, when some cheap labels buy the rights to release the songs, but they don’t even try to remaster it…
but i noticed there’s some really good stuff on it, although you’re right. a lot of his songs sound similar. i guess boom boom boom was his biggest hit

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 19:00

#14

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

Yeah, he died shortly after I started to like his stuff. :(

I like the song Boogie Chillun’ best. But Boom Boom is cool, too. there’s a video of it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOyj4ciJk34
(and some other stuff, but that’s a good version).

Biggest problem is, with so many albums out, it’s hard to know whether you’re getting an original, or just one of the compilations. :/

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 19:09

#15

mr self destruct wrote:

^ Were the two events connected, d?

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 19:16

#16

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

I fear so. :(

Posted on Thu, 29 March 2007 at 23:16

#17

Suz wrote:

Squall wrote:

I am prepared to wait as long as it takes for the next Green Day album :)

WHY? all there songs sound the same! Dookie was good but after that they became shit!

Posted on Fri, 30 March 2007 at 02:44

#18

Gimme Back My Brainsaw (Mike Hunt) wrote:

skindred are the worse, one album since 1999, well two albums but their the same album with slight different tracklist.

Posted on Fri, 30 March 2007 at 12:03

#19

mr self destruct wrote:

Misanthropologist wrote:

I fear so. :(

And how do you feel about this?

Posted on Fri, 30 March 2007 at 17:53

#20

Charlie wrote:

Suz wrote:

WHY? all there songs sound the same! Dookie was good but after that they became shit!

In a word : no.

Posted on Fri, 30 March 2007 at 17:57

#21

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

mr self destruct wrote:

And how do you feel about this?

Auditioning for Jeremy Kyle’s job, are you? I don’t think you’d fit in. Presenting the Jeremy Kyle Show. ;)

Posted on Fri, 30 March 2007 at 20:35

#22

mr self destruct wrote:

I wouldn’t mind his job - I’d take great satisfaction in patronising thick plebs.

Posted on Sat, 31 March 2007 at 07:15

#23

deadsetgav wrote:

Yeah - telling the knucklehead he ain’t the father when the DNA test results in your hand, clearly state that he is!

FIGHT!

Posted on Sat, 31 March 2007 at 08:47

#24

johnny_knoxville wrote:

All I would say is look at the work rate of Mike Patton…

Thats how it should be…

And as for Axl having a “wank”…16 years is a long time he must be trying to get into the Guiness Book Of Records for the longest Tantric Chicken Choke!

With bands taking so long to release an album, new acts and sounds come and it can damage a groups following, fans can “forget” pretty quick.
Andy said he regrets releasing Semi-Detatched so long after
Infernal Love. I think that damaged Therapy?’s following.
It took them out of the spotlight for too long.

Mr Knoxville

Posted on Sun, 1 April 2007 at 13:53

#25

(FIN) King Alcohol (Sami) wrote:

There are also bands making new album every fucking year and getting nowhere better from the debut album. I’d rather be waiting for years like 2-4 or maybe more. Ozzy’s made many records in his lifetime so why to make them with hurry?

And I’m glad some bands make their albums using lots of time ‘cos it’s pretty hard to buy every bloody record with prices hitting the skyline. :D

Posted on Sun, 20 May 2007 at 00:02

#26

(FIN) King Alcohol (Sami) wrote:

And Mike Patton isn’t a musician, he’s madman and workaholic. ;) He’s pure genius , has the touch of Midas. Goldfinger!

Posted on Sun, 20 May 2007 at 00:05

There are no more replies in this discussion. (Go to the homepage)

to post a reply. Sign in if you’re already a member.

You’re viewing replies 1–26 of 26 by 15 people

·

Page: First | Previous | Next | Last

Other discussions started by Graeme55?

Title Replies Started Last post
The Rasmus in Other Bands & Artists 26 18 Apr 2007
by Graeme55?		 29 Nov 2008
by Graeme55?
The Emo Thread in Chit-Chat 10 18 Nov 2008
by Graeme55?		 19 Nov 2008
by mr self destruct
Dream Theater in Other Bands & Artists 79 15 Jul 2007
by Graeme55?		 30 Oct 2008
by Graeme55?
Taproot in Other Bands & Artists 51 23 Aug 2006
by Graeme55?		 2 Oct 2008
by deadsetgav
WERM - my new band :) in Other Bands & Artists 19 6 Apr 2008
by Graeme55?		 1 Oct 2008
by Graeme55?

View all 87 discussions started by Graeme55?.