#31
irishlady wrote:
to bring this discussion back to the main-topic, i guess T? must have a new deal yet, as they start to record the album today ( at least that´s what martin told me ).
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 09:49
#32
Michael wrote:
And I think it’s not right to ask for a bandmember’s personal email address on a board like this one. If one of them has given it to someone, I’m sure it’s supposed to be confendential. So if anyone has it, do NOT post it here, the lads need some privacy as well, like all of us do!
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 10:21
#33
Dr. Bigjoint wrote:
What’s their record label?
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 14:19
#34
Auto_Surgery (Andy) wrote:
Don’t think anyone knows mate, thats the impression I get anyway
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 16:23
#35
Paddy wrote:
i think it will would be really sad if they failed to get a label, especially seeing as junk like Gareth Gates gets one easily.
Maybe they should release it as a Multifuckingnational “special” ??
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 16:32
#36
say10 wrote:
sometimes bands start recording new material and then present it to record companies. i guess(or i hope at least) that’s what t? are doing, because in case they already had signed a new deal there would have been a notice in the press or something.
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 18:23
#37
RobbyVDH wrote:
@ Michael: of course it should not be posted here, I’m from Belgium but not a complete idiot :D
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 19:03
#38
Michael wrote:
Don’t worry, I’m not talking about you Robby!
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 20:38
#39
say10 wrote:
Title: @ michael
i did not ask for anyone’s private emailadress, i asked for contacts like management or booking agency. i’d never use a private address for business contacts.
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 21:07
#40
Michael wrote:
I thought you were talking about private email addresses. Sorry about the mix-up.
Posted on Tue, 26 November 2002 at 21:54
#41
Idoru wrote:
Title: label
Hey…I will print their labels and copy their new cd and all…
Anyone time to drive around to distibute them? The rest by internet.
Anyone to harrass the radiostations to play them?
They can do their cd introduction at my pub and stay at home…
We can make it cheap.
Anyone intrested?
Frank
before I forgot you can mail Andy at AndyC@therapy.ie
I always do..I always get an instant message back.
Posted on Wed, 27 November 2002 at 13:13
#42
Dermot wrote:
Agghhhhhh! Omniscient means “all knowing” Blonde Babe, omnipotent means “all powerful”!
Posted on Wed, 27 November 2002 at 19:09
#43
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Surely if you’re all-powerful,you’d have the power to know everything and thereby be all-knowing? Which would equally surely make you a bit of a know-all?
Posted on Thu, 28 November 2002 at 09:29
#44
lucifers Machine wrote:
i want an omnipresent for cristmas!
Posted on Thu, 28 November 2002 at 10:25
#45
Dermot wrote:
Thats dry wit at its best citizen erased - you’re just too droll for me
Posted on Sat, 30 November 2002 at 14:35
#46
CharlieBigPotato wrote:
Posted on Tue, 3 December 2002 at 17:13
#47
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Dermot wrote:
Thats dry wit at its best citizen erased - you’re just too droll for me
Why thank you. For my next trick I shall attempt to show that being an accountant is actually a fun and interesting thing to do.
And that is irony. Or possibly bile and cynicism.
Posted on Tue, 3 December 2002 at 17:37
#48
Auto_Surgery (Andy) wrote:
Bling Bling…we have some news at last!! So they got a new drummer and are about to sign to a new label.
Anyone got any ides who the label is? Im just not patient enough!!!
:)
Posted on Wed, 4 December 2002 at 16:17
#49
Sabotage wrote:
Posted on Wed, 4 December 2002 at 16:52
#50
Auto_Surgery (Andy) wrote:
eh. You feelin alright man?
Posted on Wed, 4 December 2002 at 16:57
#51
loco wrote:
Posted on Wed, 4 December 2002 at 20:01
#52
White Psycho wrote:
Posted on Wed, 4 December 2002 at 20:02
#53
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
White Psycho wrote:
I second that thought
Posted on Thu, 5 December 2002 at 07:57
