#1
Rob_a (Rob) wrote:
Doesnt surprise me :P.
:D
Good album though.
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:40
#2
mr self destruct wrote:
There’s no such thing as bad publicity, right? :)
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:42
#3
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
Are Guardian readers those people who sit around and listen to Radio 4 all day?
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:43
#4
Dermot (The Derm) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:45
#5
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
”..the perfect visual accompaniment to such an unpleasant listen as Troublegum”
Who wrote this shite?
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:45
#6
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Damn your eyes, Dermot :p
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:46
#7
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
I didn’t actually read what was written, I guess that’s not good publicity at all then - who reads the guardian anyway?
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:48
#8
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
I do :( (and yes, I listen to Radio 4 a lot too)
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:50
#9
mrs h wrote:
Auto_Surgery wrote:
Are Guardian readers those people who sit around and listen to Radio 4 all day?
I listen to radio 4 all day :( And read Hooch’s old Guardians when she’s finished with them.
I want to know how they know it’s an old man, though. I always thought it was an old woman …
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:50
#10
mrs h wrote:
Simultaneous posting again miss lobster?
I haven’t forgotten delilah btw and will do the do :)
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:51
#11
Dermot (The Derm) wrote:
Auto_Surgery wrote:
who reads the guardian anyway?
Me! And I listen to Radio 4 :o
You can vent your frustrations here:
music.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
I didn’t know it was an old man either - thought it was some guy with a bad skin condition
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:53
#12
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
Blimey, I’m not sure what’s more shocking Mrs H listens to Radio 4 or Hooch has a back catalogue of Guardians :eek:
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 10:57
#13
fatboy wrote:
Look at the bright side, Limp Bizkit were higher up on the chart. I mean really, that is TRULY a bad cover.
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 11:02
#14
mrs h wrote:
@Auto surgery - You should listen to radio 4 to help you get over the shock. And most of the decent comedy you see on TV starts off on radio 4. And it’s never as good when it gets to TV. Try it, you might like it!:)
*hands Auto Surgery a copy of the Radio Times and a mid-morning latte*
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 11:03
#15
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
* Auto_Surgery collapses with shock
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 11:06
#16
mr self destruct wrote:
I read the Guardian too…and use their website. I also like Muesli (Guardian-readers in-joke there I’m afraid).
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 11:10
#17
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (I would set Myself On Fire For You) wrote:
diddnt the guardian once give gimme back my brain single of the week?
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 12:25
#18
Alan wrote:
I’m guessing they meant “unpleasant” as in, “uncomfortable” due to the dark themes on the album. Music doesn’t need to be pleasant to be good.
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 12:33
#19
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 12:34
#20
Dermot (The Derm) wrote:
^I was thinking that as well - was also thinking that the writer might be a fan of T? (or a former fan)
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 12:34
#21
mr self destruct wrote:
Alexis Petridis is a really good reviewer for The Guardian, I always enjoy reading his stuff. Apparently he contributed as the writers’ names are next to the last photo.
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 12:40
#22
Viirkokka (Jordan) wrote:
Alan wrote:
I’m guessing they meant “unpleasant” as in, “uncomfortable” due to the dark themes on the album. Music doesn’t need to be pleasant to be good.
They didn’t like it ‘cause they were scared of the lack of rules and boundaries :D
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 18:28
#23
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
Alan wrote:
I’m guessing they meant “unpleasant” as in, “uncomfortable” due to the dark themes on the album. Music doesn’t need to be pleasant to be good.
You don’t work for Labour do you? If not i’d get on to their spindoctor dept to see are they hiring :D
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 18:34
#24
badmother wrote:
lets face it peoples if you read the guardian you really have too much free time on your hands :D
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 20:35
#25
30 secs max wrote:
i honestly didnt realise that guy was supposed to be throwing up in that dustbin!
still, you live an learn.
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 20:56
#26
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (I would set Myself On Fire For You) wrote:
yes i bet that guy was put off drinking for a long time
fancy waking up all yellow and plasticy with your head in a bin
and to add insult to injury it gets phtographed and goes on an album cover that sells 600,000 copies
but then at least his face is hidden
Posted on Wed, 1 August 2007 at 22:06
#27
deadsetgav wrote:
badmother wrote:
lets face it peoples if you read the guardian you really have too much free time on your hands :D
If you read the Guardian you probably drive a Rover and download child porn in your free time
Posted on Thu, 2 August 2007 at 07:50
#28
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
30 secs max wrote:
i honestly didnt realise that guy was supposed to be throwing up in that dustbin!
still, you live an learn.
I didn’t realise he was suppose to be naked!
Posted on Thu, 2 August 2007 at 08:29
#29
Muskeg (T.M. O.M) wrote:
Its one of the BEST album covers ever.
Posted on Thu, 2 August 2007 at 11:59
#30
chr1s (The T.F.M) wrote:
^ I thought it was a great album cover as well. I thought the fact that the actual cd is printed like a bin lid and when you take it out, you see all the crap that is in the bin, was quite clever too.
Posted on Thu, 2 August 2007 at 12:10
