
#301
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Thanks for the film suggestions, An, I’ll check them out. Nice to see that the linked interests on people’s profiles seem to be doing their job :-)
It makes me happy that more people are getting used to the new boards, and prefer it to the old ones.
*gracefully accepts colour chart from mrs h*
*realises he is not colour blind, but just has different (read: better) taste than the female WoMbles and chucks it in the bin* :-D
Do you mean the yellow bar shown to visitors to create an account or sign in? I do like me some yellow (*ahem* Yellowtopia *ahem*), but I agree that the particular shade of the sign in bar might be a bit too bright, and will try out a different colour.
Oh, and your comment regarding the categories made my day, as that’s one of the main reasons I’ve the changed things the way I did. I always used the ‘x new posts’ link on the old boards (which was somewhat similar to the current default discussions overview), and once I marked all threads as read and returned to the homepage I found the category list very uninviting to explore further.
Posted on Thu, 23 August 2007 at 09:21
#302
yauckt.be wrote:
now, i’m sure, i HATE this new forum. Isn’t it possible to allow several layout to this forum?
Posted on Thu, 23 August 2007 at 14:04
#303
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Can you give me some specific examples of what you dislike, so I may be able to help you using the new boards?
Posted on Thu, 23 August 2007 at 14:33
#304
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
The issue where the old buddy icon kept showing after uploading a new one, reported by marja and mr self destruct, has been fixed.
Since yesterday we’re also keeping track of the highest number of members online at once, which is displayed below who’s online.
Posted on Fri, 24 August 2007 at 15:54
#305
mrs h wrote:
The pinky colour is just lovely Rene, well done. Or should I just ask you to thank your wife for helping out? :p
It is good to be able to see who likes the same things as you do, but as the only WoMble to recognise that Case Histories is the greatest book ever written is someone with only 29 posts to their name since 2001 (and who I’ve have never heard of) it’s not proving as fun as it should be.
Being able to email WoMbles was useful - are we going to get that facility back or are we stuck now with the WoMbles we’re already in contact with? *sacrifices a goat to ensure that this dreadful scenario never becomes a reality*
Posted on Fri, 24 August 2007 at 19:04
#306
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (fuck democracy) wrote:
or maybe private messages through the forum?
Posted on Fri, 24 August 2007 at 19:09
#307
Sabotage wrote:
I’m confused.
I’m using Firefox and the new message board looks weird to me.
Colours and fonts are fine. It’s the layout of the threads that looks messy.
Anyone else using Firefox?
Posted on Sat, 25 August 2007 at 01:59
#308
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (fuck democracy) wrote:
i use firefox and its fine
only older threads look a bit messy sometimes
Posted on Sat, 25 August 2007 at 09:39
#309
mrs h wrote:
Rene - I’m concerned that we don’t know when any new members have joined, and so we might not be welcoming them like we used to. Maybe you could put another thread up that never moves, just for new members to say hello? It needn’t be a whole forum - just an unmoveable thread at the top so that new people can see a place to introduce themselves and everyone else can say hello if they want to.
Also when you open a thread and it tells you how many people have posted on it, it would be interesting to be able to click on the text and see a list of all the people who have been counted. I admit that’s only because I’d like to know who has posted on Gracious Me over the years, but other people might be interested with their own threads …
Posted on Sun, 26 August 2007 at 11:24
#310
mr self destruct wrote:
Hey Teethy!
How about some little icons to click that automatically fill in the BBCode - [quote=][i] [b] etc?
I probably sound really lazy, but it would make life easier if I didn’t have to type them out each time!
Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 11:20
#311
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
mrs h, pleased to hear you like the new pink colour - I’ll make sure to tell my wife (what excellent taste her husband has) :-)
Private messaging, as a replacement for and improvement over the old e-mail form, is in the pipeline. Same goes for your suggestion, mr self destruct.
The sticky new members thread is something Sarah and I are debating. I agree the option to see who posted to a discussion is an interesting one, but I’m sorry to say it doesn’t have a very high priority, and won’t be added soon.
Sabotage, I use Firefox myself and it has been tested in that browser. Could you e-mail me a screenshot of a page that looks messy to you, to see what’s wrong? Grant, could you send me a screenshot of an older thread that looks messy to you, so I can see if it’s something I can fix? Thanks both for your help.
Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 12:09
#312
Sabotage wrote:
Rene.
I was being dim.
I was looking at the “All Categories” section of the threads, so all the various sections (chit chat etc) were all jumbled up.
I’ve managed to work out I needed to hit the “All Categories” button so I can view each section.
God I’m thick!
My initial visit to the meassage boards after your upgrade did take me to “All Categories” as default though which is why I got confused.
Sabs
Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 18:01
#313
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
The default on the new boards is indeed seeing discussions from all categories. When you do that, every discussion title/link is followed by both the person who started it and the category it’s posted in.
Folks, I’ve just added a new feature to the boards - you can now send (private) message to other WoMbles.
Access your messages by using the ‘Your messages’ link, located at the top right corner of every page. There you will find the first message waiting for you, introducing the new feature.
Posted on Thu, 30 August 2007 at 14:55
#314
chr1s (The T.F.M) wrote:
Posted on Thu, 30 August 2007 at 15:01
#315
mr self destruct wrote:
Nice new feature. I liked the “tips” in your message, especially this one - though it might be rather wishful thinking:
- Have a one on one conversation with a friend, about a subject which would bore others to death. :)
Posted on Thu, 30 August 2007 at 15:09
#316
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Posted on Thu, 30 August 2007 at 15:11
#317
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
I’ve just fixed a bug where deleting a message by either the sender or receiver would delete it for both the sender and receiver.
In addition I’ve added the option to archive received messages, so you can keep your inbox clean without the need to delete messages.
How to use your archive:
- Open the message you would like to archive, and click ‘Archive’ (below the message, on the right).
- To move an archived message back to your inbox, open the message from your archived messages, and click ‘Move to inbox’.
Hope you like it, folks.
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 11:03
#318
Divers (Simon) wrote:
Rene did you know that if you post and then use the back fuction on the browser, edit your post and reply again… it updates the post with the changes and doesn’t post twice?
I’ve been doing it for the last few days.
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 13:41
#319
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Yes, it’s to do with preventing double posts when someone clicks the submit button more than once. However, there wasn’t yet a time limit on it, creating the potential problem of unlimited edits, and I didn’t test it enough to mention it as a feature yet. This is why I’ve kept it quiet as a substitute for editing posts - until now, that is ;-) I did notice you’ve been using it, and I’ve now implemented a time limit on it (5 minutes, just like on the old boards) so everyone can use this hidden feature.
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 14:01
#320
Gimme Back My Brainsaw (fuck democracy) wrote:
test
hehehehehe editing rocks
and the time limit used to be 10 not 5
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 16:35
#321
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Was it? Well, I’m considering to make it even shorter, so enjoy it while you can!
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 16:40
#322
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
heheh. Four-and-a-half seconds. Go!
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 16:42
#323
mrs h wrote:
Rene I think you should put the birthdays back where they were. No-one is going to remember to go and look every day to see if it someone’s birthday …
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 19:00
#324
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Maybe just without the avatars?
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 19:06
#325
Divers (Simon) wrote:
Whoops sorry Rene didn’t realise i let a big secret out… i will email you next time ;)
Posted on Fri, 31 August 2007 at 21:34
#326
mrs h wrote:
Yes - you could lose the avatars and just have a list, next to a picture of a bunny rabbit holding a balloon :)
Posted on Sat, 1 September 2007 at 10:43
#327
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Posted on Sat, 1 September 2007 at 11:01
#328
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
how do you quoat someone? i’m a bit slow.
Posted on Sat, 1 September 2007 at 12:17
#329
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Posted on Sat, 1 September 2007 at 12:32
#330
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Posted on Sat, 1 September 2007 at 20:54