Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

Richard Dawkins

#

Started by mr self destruct

You’re viewing replies 31–60 of 97 by 10 people

·

Page: First | | | Last

#31

Fordonian wrote:

Oh God, thats posts terrible - spelling/meaning - right out the window!

Posted on Sun, 26 August 2007 at 22:19

#32

Misanthropologist (d) wrote:

Hehe, I understand what you’re saying. :)

Andy wrote:

Ah but d? I’d say that within whats already been said God would have a certain amount of such qualities - the references are to such texts that do pertain to it.

If the God we’re talking about here was just to be something such as vibration then no, those ideas would not be true as its all much more a case of coming into and then moving out of being - something canin effect, come from nothing etc. But I don’t feel that its not part of the premise here.

I needs me bed! :p

I do actually agree (I dont think there’s any need for a shaming :P): within the broader argument(s), those sorts of assumptions about qualities are being made. But Smum, specifically, wasn’t making those sorts of assumptions when she was talking about ironically becoming a god if she created a universe (& I shudder to imagine it…). She’s not, therefore, committed to any of the ‘extraneous’ qualities of, for example, the Christian God. For a Christian God, creation of the universe is a necessary, but not sufficient, requirement for godhood. Whereas in the case she was describing, creation of a new universe is entirely sufficient.

So nyer. ;)

Posted on Sun, 26 August 2007 at 22:44

#33

mr self destruct wrote:

mrs h wrote:

Hold up a bit…

How do you know that religious extremists are “in a ridiculously tiny majority and b) most people do not recognise that ‘justification’”, have you carried out a survey? Even if you did, religious extemists would probably lie about their beliefs. You can’t deny religious extremism is spreading…20 years ago there were no Islamic terrorist acts in Britain and a couple of years ago some “normal” blokes from your very city blew people up on the Underground!

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 10:51

#34

mr self destruct’s post on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 10:52 was deleted by a moderator

#35

mr self destruct’s post on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 11:02 was deleted by a moderator

#36

mrs h wrote:

Of course they are in a tiny minority!! They make up a small percentage of only 2 major religions - so when stacked up next to the population of the World you wouldn’t even be able to make out the colour on a pie chart! You can check out some figures at http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_coun.htm if you feel the need. Religious extremists might well lie about their activities but they are hardly going to turn round and deny their faith! And of course most people don’t recognise faith as a justification for murder or hatred - if they did we would already be bang in the middle of Armageddon.

And the ‘normal’ blokes from our city (you cheeky f**ker!!) did blow people up on the underground and nobody in their right minds thought it was a good thing, but there is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that if George Dubya and TB hadn’t waded into the Middle East and started threatening everybody it wouldn’t have happened. “Shall we hunt down Al Qaeda and prove they can’t get away with this? - No - I know what, lets stir up a whole heap of trouble all over the Middle East and make damn sure that American companies get control of all their resources and hopefully they’ll all sit down round a big table and thank us kindly”. The guy is a fucking psychopath and all this growth in ‘religious’ extremism is because when people are panicked and terrified they will react in whatever way they can to prevent it happening again.

I’m not denying that religious extremism is spreading - I’m simply saying that people’s faith in God isn’t the same thing as organised religion or religious extremism, and that you picking arguments with Jehovas Witnesses isn’t going to make the world a safer place, any more than Dawkins book is.

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 11:36

#37

mr self destruct wrote:

I didn’t pick an argument with anyone - they came up to me in the street! Which is another thing that really gets on my tits about the religious…OK, you believe in God and follow a load of complete bollocks that humans have written in a book, please KEEP IT TO YOUR FUCKING SELF!!!

I agree that Blair and Bush’s actions made things worse - and I was at the anti-war demonstrations! - but I disagree their actions alone “caused” the London bombings. Religious extremism is spreading via new communications technology - Al Qaeda and their associates are really good at that - the London bombers weren’t acting for purely political reasons but partly because of ideas about religion they’d got off the net and via videos (of the Chechen war etc.) I dislike Tony Blair intensely and he fucked up big time, but he was right when he said that religious extremists just look for excuses to kill. If they hadn’t had the Iraq war to use as an excuse it would just have been something else. Extremist consciousness is being raised and nurtured and at some point bombers would have targetted the UK, Iraq war or no war.

And if the moderates are in the vast majority, where are they when the tiny majority are mouthing off on TV or setting off bombs (I’m referring to both Christian and Muslim fundamentalists here)? I haven’t seen too many disowning the extremists (or better still, rooting out/preventing future extremism), they seem distinctly quiet on the subject. Some might say, “well, they’re peaceful, why should it be their responsibility?” OF COURSE IT’S THEIR RESPONSIBILITY - IT’S AN INTERPRETATION OF YOUR RELIGION BY YOUR FELLOW WORSHIPPERS THAT CAUSED THIS MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

I’m going to live up a mountain in Norway as soon as I possible can ;)

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 14:12

#38

Charlie wrote:

It’s quite funny writing a book about an opinion. :D Nobody knows for 100 % certainty that there is a god or not.

It’s the same with Evolution and the Big Bang - they are just theories..nobody is 100% positive.

It will sell because there are plenty of people who will buy a book if they are atheists and they need some quotes to tell their friends who believe in god to make them feel smart or something.

Like the Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown has said its only fiction but that doesnt stop loads of atheists reading it and feeling self satisfied.

I saw a TV show a while back called ” the problem with atheists ” and it was basically showing them as in your face and convinced about their opinion as believers, saying its almost a religion in its own right, so whats the difference ? :D

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 16:40

#39

Kyle Bovine (K B) wrote:

I enjoyed the Enemies of Reason shows. another amazing book i would advise anyone to read about destroying the shite around astrology, princess diana, modern politicians, self-help books, thatcherism, pop-art etc is a book called How Mumbo Jumbo Conquered the World by Francis Wheen, its an incredibly well written hilarious book that rigourously destroys myths of our age

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 18:50

#40

mrs h wrote:

First things first - ta d! :D

*alters d’s fate and re-creates him as a man of abundant talents, charm and wit*

Sam, you’ve gone from saying you enjoy arguing with Jehova’s Witnesses to conjuring up a direct link between my auntie’s private worship and the terrors your unborn children might possibly face in the event of the 3rd World War. Are these your private theories or have you spent too much time studying atheist literature? ;)

@Squall - I’m an atheist and i thought the Da Vinci code was a pile of shite :)

@Kyle - Hilarious is always good. And Happy Birthday!

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 19:26

#41

mr self destruct wrote:

If you ever discover your Auntie is preparing a load of petrol bombs (to lob at mosques), don’t come running to me for help…I’ll be up my mountain minding my own atheistic business ;)

Posted on Mon, 27 August 2007 at 19:55

#42

mrs h wrote:

Ok. But when you realise that the only way you can get an in-depth analysis about the effects of religion on the modern world that supports your views is by reading The Sun don’t come running to me for help. I will be at the bottom of your mountain, cashing in on the tourist dollar :p

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 09:06

#43

mr self destruct wrote:

So, mrs h - where exactly does your faith (in the non-existence of god) come from? (Yes, I know by its very definition faith means it doesn’t come from anywhere…what I mean is, why do you firmly believe there is no god?)

I think you’d make a great Christian (which is either a compliment or an insult depending on you view of Christianity) :p

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 09:17

#44

mrs h wrote:

I suppose partly it’s upbringing. It’s very difficult to start believing in something so ludicrous when you haven’t been influenced (brainwashed if you prefer) as a child. Pygmy children probably don’t suddenly start believing in Santa Claus or the tooth fairy, and really for me to believe in God would be the same sort of thing. Secondly there is no actual evidence at all, as far as I am aware, to support the existence of God. Thirdly it’s because it’s very easy for me to see how and why belief in God could have started and become ‘necessary’ for primitive people, how and why it has always been very convenient for spiritual and political leaders to maintain and cultivate that belief and how after hundreds of generations it is so much a part of everyone’s culture it would be very difficult for people to break out of, especially in religions such as Catholicism where the whole education side for children seems to be to scare the crap out of them.

I suspect that a lot of religious people probably have doubts at times - but to abandon belief in God would seem so disloyal and terrible that they are not prepared to explore the possibility. In fact one of Anna’s schoolfriends came from a family of Evangelical Christians. Something really terrible happened and the mother completely lost her faith and stopped believing in God, but she still allowed her husband to continue to take the kids to church and pray for her. I suppose that’s because to actively preach the non-existence of God to her children might have driven a huge wedge between husband and wife. To be honest I didn’t really care what they believed at all until one night Anna told me that her friend had cried herself to sleep at a sleepover because she honestly believed that Anna (being unbaptised) was going to go to Hell. I can’t understand how a mother with no faith can allow her child to suffer like that over something she doesn’t even believe in herself!

Anyway - like it or not it’s ingrained in our society and there’s not much point trying to rip it out because it would leave so many gaping holes all over the place we’d probably end up with anarchy and chaos. And for all it’s a romantic ideal I reckon that rather than a free society we’d be straight back to survival of the fittest.

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 09:48

#45

Dennis wrote:

Spot on mrs h!

As for Anna’s mate’s mum, having been there myself I can say it is quite an odd feeling when, so to speak, the curtain is drawn back and instead of the Wizard of Oz, there’s just a sad old man with a smoke machine. If you get my drift. It does take quite a bit of mental unravelling to undo what you have always been lead to believe.

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 13:19

#46

mrs h wrote:

Thanks for the support Dennis, I thought I’d killed the thread! :D

I’d forgotten you used to be religious. It must actually take a lot of courage to do that mental unravelling, but I’m curious - did you find it scary or just sad / disappointing? Or was it just a relief that it made sense to you? And what did your family make of it all?

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 13:29

#47

Dennis wrote:

Did I find it scary? No.

Sad/ Disappointing? Hmmm, I suppose I did, cos one minute you have “all the answers”, or so you think, and the next you don’t, so in some ways it’s frustrating. But only midly so.

the real feeling that sticks in my mind is the latter you mention: relief. Even though it could be seen as a step backwards, or a giving-up of something, it didn’t feel like that at all. It felt like a leap forward, a moment where the penny dropped. I am happy to have an atheist belief. I don’t feel as if I have lost anything or become lost, either. It just feels like standing back from a picture you were too close to and suddenly seeing what it was a picture of:

“Oh YEAH! It’s an elephant on a motorbike! It just looked like a grey mess from where i was standing!”

My family - my brothers seem to have followed the same process really, so they understood straight off. My parents have made a couple of small comments but have never been nasty about it or shown any disappointment, though I guess it must worry them in some ways. They are very liberal for Christian parents.

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 13:56

#48

mrs h wrote:

That’s a really good description - I had no idea you could be so articulate! ;)

I only wondered if it was scary because if you had the slightest doubt in your mind I would have expected you to feel a bit apprehensive about pissing off an omnipotent being. But then I suppose if you had the slightest doubt in your mind then you wouldn’t be an atheist anyway. It’s interesting that your brothers came to the same conclusion though. Had you talked about it or did you all just end up in the same place by coincidence?

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 14:08

#49

Dennis wrote:

Thanks *blushes*

Coincidence I think.

My younger bro was never really that into it anyway, I don’t think. He’s always been somewhat… satanic.
My older brother and I talked about it a fair bit, which I think helped us both make up our minds. You know, asking out loud questions that I suppose, yes, I was a little scared of asking at first. Cos, yeah, there is that thing of “God’s gonna be angry with you for questioning it”. Even though questioning things is perfectly natural, normal and fair and usually how you prove things are true. Maybe that’s why religion discourages it…

Incidentally, now I have brought it up I really really want a picture of an elephant on a motorbike :(

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 14:27

#51

Dennis wrote:

FANTASTIC! :D

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 14:44

#52

deadsetgav wrote:

Careful what you wish for and all that…
http://www.thingofthemonth.com/images/uploads/tin_elephant.jpg

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 14:45

#53

Dennis wrote:

I can feel an “elephants on motorbikes (and other assorted motorised cycles)” thread comng on.

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 15:05

#54

deadsetgav wrote:

Ok, it is more of a scooter than a motorbike, but who the hell do you think I am? God?

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 15:16

#55

Dennis wrote:

Well, yes, but seeing as Richard Dawkins has convinced me that you don’t exist, I don’t care.

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 15:28

#56

deadsetgav wrote:

What does he know about anything? - he’s just got a silly robot voice and that fancy wheelchair…

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 15:40

#57

Dennis wrote:

LMAO

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 15:46

#58

mrs h wrote:

Bloody hell Gav - did you colour that yourself? :D

I suppose it would confuse newbies and non-Gracious Me-ers too much if I were to launch into an explanation of why I believe in Gav - but it’s primarily to do with Heysatan. There’s irony for you …

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 15:50

#59

hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:

John Humphreys and Richard & Judy are thrashing it out about Dawkins on C4 now…

Posted on Tue, 28 August 2007 at 16:32

#60

mrs h wrote:

No they’re not :( Why didn’t you phone me? I would have been interested in that if I could have pretended it wasn’t Richard and Judy.

Posted on Wed, 29 August 2007 at 09:10

You’re viewing replies 31–60 of 97 by 10 people

·

Page: First | | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.