#61
Dennis wrote:
I liked Get Ready a lot, but that last one was patchy.
Anyhow, I was being a bit facetious really, to say it would take three bullets to get JD back together..
…I mean, if Barny, Steve and Hooky were in a line, for example, it’d take just the one shot..
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 15:16
#62
FNYANKEZ wrote:
gimmie wrote:
bit hard for the original metallica lineup to reform when one of them is dead.
Ron McGovney’s still alive..as far as I know anyway. He was on their “Behind the Music” episode.
Posted on Thu, 22 February 2007 at 17:12
#63
Dennis wrote:
:D I just KNEW some pedantic WoMble would bring that up!
Posted on Fri, 23 February 2007 at 09:05
#64
zipless wrote:
Divers wrote:
I’m personally not a fan at all but the jam have just reformed.. without Paul Weller?? what’s the fucking point, could anyone pick out the other two out of a line up?
http://www.nme.com/news/26537
Oh shit, I just hope Weller stays well away. Will people ever learn? Reunions SUCK!
Posted on Sat, 24 February 2007 at 11:07
#65
(FIN) King Alcohol (Sami) wrote:
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 12:21
#66
The Auto Surgeon (Mark) wrote:
Skunk Anansie, if there’s any justice in this world :cool:
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 14:22
#67
Taunty Dan wrote:
what, they’d be lined up and shot? :p
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 17:36
#68
Charlie wrote:
I’ve met Mark Richardson from Skunk Anansie and Feeder. Really nice guy. Built like a brick shit house obviously. Was really down to earth too - not like a rockstar at all.
:)
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 17:39
#69
Taunty Dan wrote:
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 17:46
#70
Charlie wrote:
It is quite confusing, what with him playing in two big rock oriented bands :)
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 18:20
#71
The Auto Surgeon (Mark) wrote:
Never mind Dan. You might reach to about a thousanth of his talent.
Posted on Sun, 4 March 2007 at 19:22
#72
Divers (Simon) wrote:
Taunty Dan wrote:
I would say being in the Little Angels throws you down into such a low league then even though he has been in two biggish bands he is only currently pubrock status… he pretty much needs to join Led Zepplin if they ever reform to move him up to a respectible level of rock stardom.
Posted on Mon, 5 March 2007 at 08:59
#73
Taunty Dan wrote:
Squall wrote:
It is quite confusing, what with him playing in two big rock oriented bands :)
ok, i’m a rock fan. I know feeder and little angels. I STILL couldn’t pick him out of a line up. Being in a band does NOT make you a “rock star”… :rolleyes:
Posted on Mon, 5 March 2007 at 20:28
#74
Taunty Dan wrote:
The Auto Surgeon wrote:
Never mind Dan. You might reach to about a thousanth of his talent.
LOL!!! :D
Wait, no, was that a joke?
Posted on Mon, 5 March 2007 at 20:29
#75
Charlie wrote:
Taunty Dan wrote:
ok, i’m a rock fan. I know feeder and little angels. I STILL couldn’t pick him out of a line up. Being in a band does NOT make you a “rock star”… :rolleyes:
Well, ive met him and had a good old chat :)
Do you not read music magazines then - or look at album covers :D
Posted on Mon, 5 March 2007 at 20:30
#76
Taunty Dan wrote:
and Mark Richardson is constantly in the press is he? Don’t get me wrong, you like the bloke which is fair enough, i’m just saying that the reason he doesn’t act like a rock star is because he’s not one.
Posted on Mon, 5 March 2007 at 20:40
#77
Charlie wrote:
He may not be a ROCK STAR but you cant deny he has been in two very succesful bands.
Posted on Mon, 5 March 2007 at 22:01
#78
romy wrote:
Squall wrote:
I’ve met Mark Richardson from Skunk Anansie and Feeder. Really nice guy. Built like a brick shit house obviously. Was really down to earth too - not like a rockstar at all.
:)
Yeah, and much nicer than his other bandmates who have started to think they were rockstars :)
Posted on Tue, 6 March 2007 at 11:53
#79
Dennis wrote:
Taunty Dan wrote:
and Mark Richardson is constantly in the press is he? Don’t get me wrong, you like the bloke which is fair enough, i’m just saying that the reason he doesn’t act like a rock star is because he’s not one.
Agreed.
Bit hard to throw your weight around and demand ridiculous diva-esque measures when the staff in venues reply with:
“…erm…and you are…? Oh, you’re in the band..? Sorry, didn’t realise. What’s the name of the band again…?…”
Posted on Tue, 6 March 2007 at 12:11
#80
Taunty Dan wrote:
Squall wrote:
He may not be a ROCK STAR but you cant deny he has been in two very succesful bands.
so now he’s not a rock star? Make your mind up dude…
Posted on Tue, 6 March 2007 at 17:44
#81
Charlie wrote:
:rolleyes: I see you are one of those argue for the sake of it types who must never be wrong at all costs.
Posted on Wed, 7 March 2007 at 12:24
#82
Taunty Dan wrote:
funniest thing i EVER heard! Pot, kettle? ;)
Posted on Wed, 7 March 2007 at 17:47
#83
Divers (Simon) wrote:
So Led Zeppelin are looking very much like they are going to reform and play a One off in November, god know how much the tickets would be? What are peoples thoughts about it, and would you go and see it?
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 10:44
#84
chr1s (The T.F.M) wrote:
I think that Led Zep are over rated anyway, so wouldn’t pay to go and see it.
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 10:47
#85
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
I just never got into Led Zeppelin, I’m not sure what it is about them.
Tickets will be astronomical!
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 10:48
#86
chr1s (The T.F.M) wrote:
Divers wrote:
I would say being in the Little Angels throws you down into such a low league then even though he has been in two biggish bands he is only currently pubrock status… he pretty much needs to join Led Zepplin if they ever reform to move him up to a respectible level of rock stardom.
:D Maybe Mark Richardson can join now :D
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 10:55 in reply to an earlier post
#87
Dennis wrote:
I wouldn’t bother going to see Led Zep now, although I would buy a DVD of the show - simply cos it’d be cheaper.
In some ways I just don’t see the point - One guy is missing, Page is way past his best and there’s the same “new material” issue as with other bands that reform (i.e. if there’s no new stuff why bother and if there IS new stuff it’s usually shite compared to the classics) BUT on the other hand whilst there are the three of them still alive, why not go out one last time and play the songs they wrote to people who want to hear them?
If you want to see it, you pays your money and makes your choice, if you don’t, just stay away, simple as.
There are quite a few bands I would love to see reform just cos I missed them first time around (Smiths, Jam etc) but the truth is that I would most likely be disappointed if I did see them. Expectation just grows to ridiculous levels amongst fans, don’t you think?
Having said that, these tickets will be astronomically priced, which is never a good thing.
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 11:00
#88
Divers (Simon) wrote:
I don’t personally see the point either… better to just leave something be I was actually disappointed in them when i heard they were thinking of doing it. They are a band that I was brought up on but as you said with one member missing it’s just as bad as the Who or Queen. The only band i really enjoyed when i saw the reunion was the Pixies.
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 11:04
#89
Dennis wrote:
Spookily enough I was just watching some Queen + Paul Rogers songs on Youtube. Again, it isn’t the same, never could be, but I can see why some people would enjoy it for what it is rather than what it’s not.
Should bands split when a major member dies/ leaves..? I always think “yes” but… What about Back In Black - arguably DC’s best album?!
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 11:09
#90
Auto_Surgery (Mad Axe Man) wrote:
Yeah, my mate asked me to go see Queen with Paul Rogers and I refused simply because it’s not ‘Queen’
Posted on Wed, 12 September 2007 at 11:12
