#31
CS (Colin S) wrote:
I’m gonna enter tomorrow.
Sarah, if I enter on flickr, then send you a different entry, does that mean I get considered twice? :)
Posted on Mon, 10 December 2007 at 22:56
#32
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
You can enter twice if you want, but I’d rather you uploaded them both to Flickr yourself and save me the bother :p
Posted on Mon, 10 December 2007 at 23:12
#33
Viirkokka wrote:
hoochalobster wrote:
(Off topic: All you coke lovers might be interested in this)
There’s stuff at our college atm where these two guys (students) have a petition they’re asking people to sign to abolish coke from our college. It’s a bit fucking lame ‘cause tbh you know how pretentious Students can be.. pretending they give a crap about stuff and promoting Che Guevara. Well it’s like that except if they’re making a petition they need 51% of the college to sign it so it’s essentially taking away Coke from EVERYONE and therefore similar to a dictatorship; the ones who want the choice of having coke don’t get it anyway.
ITS BULLSHIT AND ITS ACTUALLY MAKING ME REALLY ANGRY. I don’t even drink coke!
People should be educated about Coke’s “Bad practices” rather than just getting a bunch of mindless idiots to sign it away so that no one can have it.
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 09:26 in reply to an earlier post
Last edited by Teethgrinder on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 11:13 (Corrected use of quotes)
#34
Macker wrote:
Mmmmmmmm coke i love coke!
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 11:58
#35
Dennis wrote:
I think it is naive to think that any of the big corporations that make millions each year are entirely ethical and respectable.
Of course, that doesn’t mean we should endorse them all or accept what they do, but if the allegations are true then Coca Cola are just another in a whole barrel of rotten apples.
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:09
#36
Macker wrote:
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:17
#37
mrs h wrote:
Actually I believe that Coca Cola are worse, in that they are responsible for the murders of trade unionists throughout South America. I agree that multinationals are all unethical to some degree, but there’s a subtle difference between being unethical and actually killing people.
@Virokokka - are you seriously trying to suggest that you wouldn’t be able to drink coke if they didn’t sell it on college premises? If you really want to support a company that is responsible for so much sickness, misery and death then you could buy your coke from Tesco and double the damage :)
@sarah - Will you send me your login details? Cheers :)
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:20
#38
Macker wrote:
This thread is kinda off the point now
hmmmmmmmmm The Gemil competition sponsored by coke
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:23
#39
Dennis wrote:
Well, yes of course. I wouldn’t argue with that. You never quite know what goes on away from the schmaltzy adverts do you? :(
:mad:
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:25
#40
mrs h wrote:
Macker wrote:
This thread is kinda off the point now
hmmmmmmmmm The Gemil competition sponsored by coke
Fair point - that sounds terrible.
*pulls gemil face thingy wotsit*
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:27 in reply to an earlier post
#41
Macker wrote:
I blame the polar bears, they’re always guzzling coke!
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:34
#42
deadsetgav wrote:
Leave Coca Cola alone… they invented Father Christmas after all!
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:35
#43
wyrd wrote:
Back in Topic, I just sent my picture to Sarah!
Back off topic, I hate Coca Cola too!
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 12:38
#44
Macker wrote:
Holidays are coming holidays are coming always coca cola la la la la la la la la tis the season its always the real thing!
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 13:00
#45
Teethgrinder (René Fennema) Administrator wrote:
Can we get this back on topic, please?
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 13:35
#46
Macker’s post on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 13:52 was deleted by Teethgrinder (Off-topic)
#47
wyrd wrote:
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 14:13
#48
Dennis wrote:
I make that four entries now. At least I am not in fifth place. Yet. :(
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 14:27
#49
Viirkokka’s post on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 15:36 was deleted by hoochalobster (Off-topic)
#50
Dennis wrote:
Quick question Hooch:
My entry was a bit tongue-in-cheek, in that I had photoshopped a Gemil rather than pulling the face myself…Do such entries still count (I wasn’t expecting it to) or should we kept it as it started off with actual faces of WoMbles being stretched to the outer limits of human-gemilisation?
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 15:54
#51
mrs h wrote:
You mean that’s not your face? :(
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 17:36
#52
mrs h wrote:
You can’t beat d anyway …
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 18:18
#53
Misanthropologist’s post on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 18:27 was deleted by Teethgrinder (Off-topic)
#54
mrs h’s post on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 18:31 was deleted by Teethgrinder (Off-topic)
#55
Misanthropologist’s post on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 18:33 was deleted by Teethgrinder (Off-topic)
#56
mrs h’s post on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 18:37 was deleted by Teethgrinder (Off-topic)
#57
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Hey Dennis
The original intention was for people to pull a face but it was open to interpretation - so it does count. You are allowed a second entry in which we see just how stretchy you are though and, personally, I’d rather see some human gemil action than Photoshop, hehehe.
Posted on Tue, 11 December 2007 at 22:59
#58
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 12 December 2007 at 18:31
#59
mrs h wrote:
Get the signed one and start a new competition where the prize is your old one. Or put your old one on ebay. Or just enter for fun and sell the prize.
You won’t beat d anyway, it’s impossible!
Posted on Wed, 12 December 2007 at 18:38
#60
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
You’re going to jinx me. :(
And my chances of winning. :(
Posted on Wed, 12 December 2007 at 23:47
