#91
gapu wrote:
you’re right
i recently got also into a bit of hip hop and electronic… but i think that is so much different, from the a typical rockband music, you realy cant compare these musical styles
but i have to say i also listen to some quiter songs like beck’s sea change.. you also can’t compare this album with f.e. nane. but it has a lot of quality songs on it and i would never be able to call becks album as a “lalala”-album. some of you might say it, like i say that oasis sound pretty lame to me. full stop.
just can agree:
kossu wrote:
This is a free world (or it should beand thank god everybody can like whatever they want!
Posted on Thu, 27 July 2006 at 07:43
#92
varshamail@tiscali.c wrote:
Title: oasis
Back in ‘94 I saw Oasis on the D Maybe tour & they were pretty crap live.Following night saw T? in same venue(S’hampton Guild) & quite simply T? blew them offstage!On the subject of Stone Roses,recently bought 1ST album which has stood the test of time.Never caught them live but recently saw Complete Stone Roses(tribute)who were pretty good.To end,Champagne Supernova is awful while Wonderwall is complete bollocks-shite song,even worse video.
Posted on Mon, 11 September 2006 at 17:27
#93
jac3k wrote:
i think in some way oasis has created something new and i find their lyrics easy to understand for me
there’s no ‘plan’ in what one hear, but lot of emotions i think i understand; but it’s probably less complicated than T? …
i think these two bands make good songs with no kind of aggression like ‘i spin your eyes motherf*’
i listen to maaany things and would say oasis is worth it
noel is a great singer :)
Posted on Mon, 11 September 2006 at 19:39
#94
Dennis wrote:
varshamail@tiscali.c wrote:
On the subject of Stone Roses,recently bought 1ST album which has stood the test of time.
Personally, I love the much-maligned and under-rated 2nd album by the Stone Roses, The Second Coming
Posted on Tue, 12 September 2006 at 11:57
#95
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Oasis have a roadmovie outin November to go with their new Best of ( sony records’ cash in - nothing to do with band )
Should be interesting :)
Posted on Tue, 12 September 2006 at 15:08
#96
jvoc00 (Jeff Forcari) wrote:
Oasis Are great! There’s a reason they we’re given a lifetime contribution to music award . You can say what you want but when you have top artists like Kirk Hammett of metallica, U2, Coldplay giving them praise as great song writers you have to give them something. On top of that they we’re voted the most important band in England.(granted I don’t agree with that) but if you also have Radiohead, the beatles, and the Rollingstones on that list these aren’t that clueless people. I am a guitarist who has been playing for 15 years and I think Noel is one of the best writers of this generation. As far as liam goes who cares if he is arrogant. They are a rock and Roll band and you’ll probably never meet them anyway.
Posted on Sun, 13 April 2008 at 21:42
#97
Dennis wrote:
The Thread That Will Not Die
Squall, have you been making duplicate accounts to restart this or what…?! :-/
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 12:35
#98
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
No i dont ramble as much as that.
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 12:46
#99
Dennis wrote:
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 12:53
#100
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
jvoc00 wrote:
Oasis Are great! There’s a reason they we’re given a lifetime contribution to music award . You can say what you want but when you have top artists like Kirk Hammett of metallica, U2, Coldplay giving them praise as great song writers you have to give them something. On top of that they we’re voted the most important band in England.(granted I don’t agree with that) but if you also have Radiohead, the beatles, and the Rollingstones on that list these aren’t that clueless people. I am a guitarist who has been playing for 15 years and I think Noel is one of the best writers of this generation. As far as liam goes who cares if he is arrogant. They are a rock and Roll band and you’ll probably never meet them anyway.
rock n roll is shit
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 12:57 in reply to an earlier post
#101
Dennis wrote:
Rock n roll ain’t noise pollution
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 12:59
#102
deadsetgav wrote:
What is rock?
Rock is the area between the balls and the anus of a dog or of a man
What is rock?
Rock is the possibility of choking on your own vomit in the back of a rapist’s van
What is rock?
Denim clad Satanists making love in the sewers of Birmingham during Maggie Thatcher’s prime
What is Rock?
Rock is meeting the grim reaper in a sports arena stampede at the tender age of nine
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 13:09
#103
deadsetgav wrote:
What is rock?
Backwards messages to boys and girls, to bring machines guns to the schools
What is rock?
No I’m not talking about Canadian producer and 5th Metallica Bob Rock you fool
What is rock?
Oh AC/DC, Cleveland, Ohio, Well basically it’s harder and heaver and slightly more blues based than pop.
What is rock?
Historians keep nagging about Funhouse but me? I think Kill City is where it’s at.
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 13:10
#104
Alan wrote:
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 13:33
#105
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
:eek: Rockandroll is the greatest music there is.
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 16:48
#106
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
No it is not. Take Oasis for example, they are rock n roll in my view. Neither here nor there, always plodding along in a nice safe narrow zone, never really straying form a format that to be far is aimed at the masses, Mr I only buy a few cds at christmas and one of them was the new Bon Jovi. Therapy? have done the good time rock n roll thing with Joey etc, and while its not shit it is just a tad lazy sound wise, listen to it a few times and you have got all you can get form it. I’ll quite gladly listen to rock n roll from the 50’s up until the 80’s but after that it just became something different, something lazy and full of cheese.
Posted on Mon, 14 April 2008 at 18:50
#107
efilnikufesin wrote:
I think oasis are a modern version of 70’s glam rock like ‘the sweet’ etc fox on the run!
Posted on Fri, 18 April 2008 at 23:24
#108
jvoc00 (Jeff Forcari) wrote:
This is in regards to the comment that Rock and roll is shit . I saw your posting about how you like Depeche Mode. No wonder you don’t like Oasis. When your listening to that computer created music your taste is bound to suffer.
Posted on Mon, 21 April 2008 at 19:05
#109
Dennis wrote:
^ What. A .Load. Of. Bollocks.
Depeche Mode make music with far more passion and emotion in it than Oasis ever have done. Whatever tools they use (incidentally, these tools include such computerised devices as “acoustic drums” and “guitars”), they still craft and create the songs themselves. They use computers, but the music is NOT “computer generated”. Martin Gore has used all kinds of weird everyday objects to create sounds for samples - samples which these days will be fed into a computer to allow them to be manipulated but so what? It’s only the same kind of looping and editing process Pink Floyd used on tracks like Money - It just happens that Floyd had to use the technology of the day (tape) whereas DM have more modern advances at their disposal.
Noel’s guitar sound relies heavily on digital delay - is HIS music being made “by computers”…? Technology is there in many forms and it’s down to how you use it that counts.
Anyways, I have both Oasis and Depeche Mode albums in my collection - Music isn’t a competition. It isn’t “either/ or”.
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 08:45
#110
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
jvoc00 wrote:
This is in regards to the comment that Rock and roll is shit . I saw your posting about how you like Depeche Mode. No wonder you don’t like Oasis. When your listening to that computer created music your taste is bound to suffer.
hahahah funny shit! ‘taste is bound to suffer’ hahahahhahahahaha
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 09:38 in reply to an earlier post
#111
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
I like some depechemde as well as leftfield, prodigy as well as rock like masodon metallica machine head and other M bands:p
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 12:09
#112
jvoc00 (Jeff Forcari) wrote:
Your right music is not a competition. I don’t mean to bag on Depeche mode. I definetly think they have something to offer. As far as the passion goes I disagree. I think Noel is as passionate a player as any. People might have issue with some of the silly thing he says but all the guitar players I know give him much respect. While originality is not his strongest point he is an amazing songwriter. I guess I get caught up in the whose better stuff when its really pointless. When it comes down to it both are considered classic groups in their own right.
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 13:40
#113
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Noel is a great guitarist. He’s obviously not Petrucci but he’s certainly a lot better than he lets on.
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 14:53
#114
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
jvoc00 wrote:
Your right music is not a competition. I don’t mean to bag on Depeche mode. I definetly think they have something to offer. As far as the passion goes I disagree. I think Noel is as passionate a player as any. People might have issue with some of the silly thing he says but all the guitar players I know give him much respect. While originality is not his strongest point he is an amazing songwriter. I guess I get caught up in the whose better stuff when its really pointless. When it comes down to it both are considered classic groups in their own right.
Passion? i’v got passion but im shit. Oasis in my view have nothing to offer, back in the day yes but now? fuck no.
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 18:42 in reply to an earlier post
#115
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Despite being better than all the current NME loving bands at the moment like the view, Klaxons, etc… Basically all the stripey top, girls jeans wearing garage bands that are ten a penny but are completely without merit.
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 19:06
#116
deadsetgav wrote:
Like all the Anorak wearing, moody shoegazing, ten a penny Britpop bands that littered the 90’s?
The look has changed but its the same shit, just a different day - you just prefer the stuff that was around when you were growing up because it caught your imagination…
I’m sure the people 10 -15 years older than us complained about all the make up wearing, electronic sounding ten a penny new wave bands of the 80’s and complained how they weren’t a patch on Led Zepplin, Bowie or Mott the fucking Hoople…
The kids now are gonna hate your music and think their music is better… and the cycle goes - in 10 years one or two of the new crop of bands will still be around making records and their fans will have grown with them and those same fans will be complaining about the new crop of 10 a penny bands that aren’t as good as their band.
Its just life - it always has been - deal with it. listen to what ‘floats your boat’ and get over it.
Don’t like the songs on the Radio? turn it off - or turn it to an old persons station like Radio 2 because they are probably playing the music you like - cause if you are 28/29 - thats what you are - old! you just don’t know it yet ;)
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 19:23
#117
Muskeg (Yes, It's me.) wrote:
Posted on Tue, 22 April 2008 at 20:09
