#121
mrs h wrote:
Only that he didn’t approve of the company you have been keeping. And that he didn’t approve of any of the stuff you have been getting up to with the company you have been keeping. And that he didn’t approve of the financial and emotional cost implications of the things you have been getting up to with the company you have been keeping. And that he thinks you stole his credit card. And that he thinks you have used his credit card to make purchases on http://www.whistlewhileyouwank.com …
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 14:24
#122
mrs h wrote:
Actually that should have been ‘whilst’. The other one is for illiterate midgets.
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 14:26
#123
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
OKay, fine! :mad: *hands back deeds to Midgets R Us Ltd* I didn’t want his stupid company anyway. *sulks* *misses midgets*
But I didn’t steal his credit card! *hires lawyer to defend against Dan’s accusations. Using Dan’s credit card*
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 14:28
#124
mrs h wrote:
*wonders why d would defend against accusations rather than suing Dan for slander*
*looks suspiciously at miniscule lawyer*
d, that ‘lawyer’ is wearing a chef’s outfit. How much did you pay?
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 14:36
#125
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Well, the outfit was a little extra, but I think it was worth it. I would have preferred the French Maid’s costume, but The French Pastry Chef was a little more reasonably priced.
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 14:42
#126
mrs h wrote:
*treads on lawyer*
Oh bollocks! Sorry d, it just got right under my feet. Still, I’m sure it won’t hurt your case to have a dead midget dressed as a pastry chef for a lawyer. If you could sit him on your knee and find some way to make his mouth open and close you would manage to persuade any jury of your innocence :)
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 14:49
#127
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Back to GM with the pair of you :mad:
Posted on Sat, 7 June 2008 at 16:36
