#91
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
Yes we have some good reasons to have voted a massive NO. First of all we don’t trust Sarkozy anymore. He lied us, he steals our money through more and more taxes. He tries to be like GW Bush by every way about business political plan with careless of us, working people. His new idea, deport soldiers units in Iraq whatever we absolutly don’t want that. Merchandise price costs more and more expensive here every month we can just notice it and pay. Everyday fuel price increase too much, 1.50€ per 1 liter of 95, which one including 75% of taxes. Either people have started to steal fuel in Fuel station or they just pay 5€ until the next time, as me. Politicians try to spre
Posted on Wed, 18 June 2008 at 23:08
#92
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
Politicians try to spread us to thinly but we don’ believe them anymore. That’s over. All people don’t care about French football team, fuck them. Our business is somewhere else. That European comunity is 27 countries that they don’t live with equivalent economical level. Compare irish, german, dutch, french, swedish economical level with slovakian, romanian or polish ones ! By the way do you know that polish workers coming working in France don’t find a place to live, then they sleep outside on pavements. They have salary thought they can’t live here so they go back home.
Another example, some of relocating factories, enterprises to Romania are agree to keep their employees but with 100€ per month as salary. Seriously, they make fun of us don’t they ?
We just want to manage already our own problems. I hope my opinion has been clear enough. Smells very closed Riot here.
Posted on Wed, 18 June 2008 at 23:31
#93
mr self destruct wrote:
Viirkokka wrote:
and suddenly the public of concerned countries are “welcoming it with open arms” or “overjoyed that the treaty has been passed” - It was on the Lisbon Treaty official website.
And you believe this propaganda!
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 05:57 in reply to an earlier post
#94
mr self destruct wrote:
You are sounding more naive with every post Viirkokka - I’m looking forward to your next gem!
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 06:40

#95
mrs h wrote:
Viirkokka wrote:
@ Mrs_H: “Also I think you are confused about rehabilitation / reeducation - these are things that happen whilst the prisoner is locked up, not instead of.”
I’m not confused about them, it was a kind of “What if..?” As in 1) Inprison them or, 2) Rehab them or, 3) Prison and rehab, etc.
Lets forget the death sentence for a moment because I’m not advocating guillotining everyone who commits murders or robs X times. What I’m saying (Sorry if this wasn’t clear) is how much do you rehabilitate / re-educate someone before you realise it’s a lost cause? And then, what do you do with them?
There isn’t a simple answer to that, everyone is an individual and some things shouldn’t down to law. That’s why we have teams of professional people who work with prisoners and who decide what is the best way to help them. Just like we do for children in care, teenage mothers and drug addicts. There shouldn’t be a fixed number of times that you try - it should be down to experienced people to make the decision as to whether it is feasible to offer second chances. But in general I would say that the worse the person’s problems the harder you should try.
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 12:14 in reply to an earlier post
#96
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
I’v no problem with tough prison sentences. Its the killing/murdering bit I would have trouble with. They say you get more right wing as you grow older, watch your self Jordan!
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 18:43
#97
mr self destruct wrote:
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 19:49
#98
mr self destruct wrote:
Wouldn’t surprise me if they just fixed the results if they got their way and forced a second referendum…such are out leaders contempt of democracy.
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 19:51
#99
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
‘Pick a card, any card. No, not that one…’
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 19:53
#100
mrs h wrote:
:D
They snuck ours through, though didn’t they? Tiny tiny piece in the paper this morning - “UK accepts Lisbon treaty, queen to sign off tonight”
I never even knew she was signing on! :D
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 20:19
#101
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 20:41

#102
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
it’s very strange, more I read you more I think you talk about death penalty. Is death penalty the main argument with which your governments try to sell you the Lisbon treaty ? In France they’ve never talken about death penalty , they’ve just use and are still using employment, money arguments which ones will be better for our national open market economy. But that’s wrong. Living in France is harder and harder. Most of people knows more and more problems, money difficulties. Day after day some enterprises close out themselves or relocate themselves careless for workers and families.
Once Sarkozy has put a referendum about his “mini-treaty”. We all massively voted NO. Guess, Him and his government took economical reforms that we voted against to. Here, we highly tell now he is the little king in his kingdom. He despises french worker people and more for jobless, He lets dying homless by hungry or by cold on every winter. He talks a lot as a crook he is anyway. He disregards democracy. I notice most of your government disregard democracy. They just use any accurate enough arguments that ones are adapted for every particular mind of each countries we live in. I personnaly think that opened borders are a good thing, EURO money as european unique money is really easy (without speculation and bull operations).
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 20:42
#103
Lola* wrote:
our lard arse prime minister basically told us that if we didn’t vote yes then we are fools (and since the NO vote he has gone on to insult us!!! the citizens of the country that keeps him in fu*king pies)…well it backfired didn;t it…what a surprise…people don’t actually like being insulted…also i think a lot of people voted no because they had no idea what was going on, it felt like we were being totally kept in the dark on purpose…we were told: you don;t need to understand it…vote yes! not understanding it is no excuse to vote no…how exactly does that make sense???????????????????
this is totally rambly and disjointed but i can’t get how annoying i feel into words!!!!!
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 20:53
#104
Dermot (The Derm) wrote:
I think if the Irish people are asked to vote again on basically the same thing then the No vote will win by even more
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 21:39
#105
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
Don’t know about that, if it was explained properly and a couple of things like the abortion, euthanasia, conscription could be shown to be non issues then I think it would go through. Nice 2 went through so…
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 21:49
#106
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
Ci? wrote:
…we were told: you don;t need to understand it…vote yes! …
I can’t believe that. Your government dared to tell you these despising arroganced words.
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 23:44 in reply to an earlier post
#107
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
Just because of that I would have voted NO
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 23:46
#108
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
Kill_Hill wrote:
Don’t know about that, if it was explained properly …
That is the expected quantum of a political suggestion. (They really think that we are puppets… how do you tell in english ” bande de connards” ? )
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 23:52 in reply to an earlier post
#109
Evilbeast (Plastic Bertrand) wrote:
Zozone : Bande de connards -> bunch of silly buggers(or Jerks )
and for “Sarko” ,the famous : ” Casse-toi ,pov’ con” :D
Posted on Thu, 19 June 2008 at 23:58
#110
mrs h wrote:
interzone wrote:
it’s very strange, more I read you more I think you talk about death penalty. Is death penalty the main argument with which your governments try to sell you the Lisbon treaty ? .
Our government hasn’t tried to sell it to us at all - they haven’t talked about it and there was no referendum, they just said yes! If Ireland had voted yes, the UK public would probably never have heard of the treaty in the first place.
The death penalty stuff was just the main reason that we were saying we would have voted “no” if we had a choice. We wouldn’t care what the rest of the treaty said because we wouldn’t agree to that.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 07:01 in reply to an earlier post
#111
Viirkokka wrote:
mr self destruct wrote:
And you believe this propaganda!
I’m dissapointed you don’t realise I don’t believe it since it was in quotes!
Let me make it clear I DONT THINK they truly “welcome it with open arms”, which is obvious as when they did ask the public to vote they rejected it but then the people in higher power to accept it. That’s not democracy they’re asking us and if we don’t like it they say fuck it and do it anyway ‘cause they think it’s better for us.
I’m genuinly upset you think I believed it :(
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 08:38 in reply to an earlier post

#112
Viirkokka wrote:
mrs h wrote:
There isn’t a simple answer to that, everyone is an individual and some things shouldn’t down to law. That’s why we have teams of professional people who work with prisoners and who decide what is the best way to help them. Just like we do for children in care, teenage mothers and drug addicts. There shouldn’t be a fixed number of times that you try - it should be down to experienced people to make the decision as to whether it is feasible to offer second chances. But in general I would say that the worse the person’s problems the harder you should try.
I’m sorry for tugging on everyones rags I think i’ve been a bit misunderstood though. I DO agree with rehabilitation and reeducation to get people out of poverty or drug traps but I was mostly wondering what would be done with people when they have attempt after attempt to help them but they reject it. Naturally there is some point when people would give up trying to help someone, for instance spending £1m ridding someone of drugs is a lot of money that could be used to improve multiple peoples lifestyles or chunks of society. I was just wondering what comes after that for that person..?
I want to make clear I DON’T ADVOCATE capital punishment being thrown around and admittedly my first two posts were not meant to be serious but then felt it’d be interesting to pursue the topic. However, would it be wrong to put a mass murderer such as a terrorist to death?
(That is; avoiding any conspiracies that they are actually an innocent person who’se been framed, i.e; they’re guilty.)
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 08:52 in reply to an earlier post
#113
mr self destruct wrote:
Viirkokka wrote:
I’m dissapointed you don’t realise I don’t believe it since it was in quotes!
Let me make it clear I DONT THINK they truly “welcome it with open arms”, which is obvious as when they did ask the public to vote they rejected it but then the people in higher power to accept it. That’s not democracy they’re asking us and if we don’t like it they say fuck it and do it anyway ‘cause they think it’s better for us.
I’m genuinly upset you think I believed it :(
Then I apologise - it wasn’t clear from your post. As soon as I hear someone advocating the death penalty my natural reaction is to expect them to be ill-informed on other subjects as well.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 09:05 in reply to an earlier post
#114
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
I against the death penalty full stop. I don’t think you can pick and choose who is more guilty and deserves to die.
Spending 1 million on ridding some one of drugs sounds a tad steep to me. If they keep reoffending there will be a point where the courts will decide that this person has no intention of getting clean and they will stay in prison of the term of their sentence, you don’t lock them up forever its just the way it is.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 09:09
#115
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
Viirkokka wrote:
That’s not democracy they’re asking us and if we don’t like it they say fuck it and do it anyway ‘cause they think it’s better for us.
I agree here is what happens everyday in France since Sarkozy took highest political powers. Total disregarding.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 09:51 in reply to an earlier post
#116
mr self destruct wrote:
What we are seeing is “tiptoe totalitarianism”…on the postive side though, as least people are waking up to the corrupt elite’s schemes
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 09:57
#117
KJC Dublin (Karl) wrote:
That is true,
I am just astonished at the levels this is taking on. Some Danish representitative stood up yesterday and called for Ireland to leave the EU - like what the fuck?
Do they even have the Euro? Not that it makes a difference, but if I were to take on his logic, then Denmark, the UK and any other nations opposing the common currency should also bow out.
What a douchebag.
Anyways, it will be interesting to see now whether Cowen actually has the balls to represent the Irish people in front of the EU rather than treat us like “a problem”. The German government is pushing for a second vote where we will be more or less bullied to say yes. I have a feeling that this would blow up in their faces if attempted… We Irish don’t like being bullied.
He is usually a total bully in the Dail Eireann, so I don’t see why the cat has caught his tongue now.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 11:08
#118
mr self destruct wrote:
interzone wrote:
I agree here is what happens everyday in France since Sarkozy took highest political powers. Total disregarding.
I think Sarkozy seems dodgy as fuck. He seems to be some kind of businessman and celebrity as well as a politician, which is not good. I would class him with Blair and Berlusconi.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 17:54 in reply to an earlier post
#119
interzone (Get your hands off of my woman mother fucker) wrote:
I am reading a new about lisbon treaty which is written in first : european leaders decided from their own high to haunt the process of ratification of Lisbon treaty because they expect to anticipate the Czech republic rejection.
I agree with you Mrs h, most of us are seeing what’s happening with corruption and totalitarianism alike.
Posted on Fri, 20 June 2008 at 18:09
#120
punkybrewester (scott) wrote:
mr self destruct wrote:
As soon as I hear someone advocating the death penalty my natural reaction is to expect them to be ill-informed on other subjects as well.
tut-tut you shouldn’t jump to assumptions. to assume makes an ass out of u & me.
I say bring back capital punishment… 3 strikes and we George Foreman your ass.
Posted on Sun, 22 June 2008 at 10:47 in reply to an earlier post