#1
CS (Colin S) wrote:
Posted on Sun, 5 October 2008 at 21:38
#2
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
haha thats class, where did you find that?
Posted on Sun, 5 October 2008 at 21:50
#3
g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:
its wierd, now I look back I much prefer this design
that was before my time as well i think
Posted on Sun, 5 October 2008 at 22:11
#4
g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:
Posted on Sun, 5 October 2008 at 22:13
#5
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
that wasnt long before i joined :)
Posted on Sun, 5 October 2008 at 22:21
#6
Squall wrote:
I want it back too. People were much nicer back then. Now its who can be the most sarcastic
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 10:42
#7
Dermot wrote:
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 10:51
#8
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
But I really do like that pot noodle. :(
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 11:11
#9
g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:
Charlie wrote:
I want it back too. People were much nicer back then. Now its who can be the most sarcastic
Yes because a change in layout is really going to tackle sarcasm head on.
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 14:28 in reply to an earlier post
#10
Tubthumper (Scott) wrote:
Good use of sarcasm, Grant.
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 14:34
#11
Squall wrote:
Gimme Back My Brainsaw wrote:
Yes because a change in layout is really going to tackle sarcasm head on.
Case Closed.
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 15:11 in reply to an earlier post
#12
msd wrote:
Aww, little baby d the newest member :D
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 18:44
#13
fatboy wrote:
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 18:46
#14
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
i’m quite happy with this one, its good to have a change and if this one makes people more sarcastic then all the better
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 19:58
#15
Squall wrote:
Sarcasm is like. SOOO Great. I love it SOO Much. :mad:
:P
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 21:23
#16
Kill_Hill (Brendan) wrote:
oh charlie you are hilarious etc etc
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 21:29
#17
Gav wrote:
If I could be bothered, I’d plot a graph to see whether there is any correlation between the number of Charlies posts and the level of sarcasm - but I simply cant be fucked.
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 22:02
#18
g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:
Kill_Hill wrote:
oh charlie you are hilarious etc etc
now thats what I call sarcasm
Posted on Mon, 6 October 2008 at 22:32 in reply to an earlier post
#19
buffalo-boy wrote:
i want that look back! Much easier to navigate!
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 07:22
#20
Dermot wrote:
I’ve just figured out that Charlie is Squall… isn’t he?
I want the old boards back to use the embarrassed icon :-(
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 08:25
#21
KJC Dublin (Karl) wrote:
He was Muskeg before that - get with the programme dude ;-)
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 08:56
#22
g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:
Dermot wrote:
I’ve just figured out that Charlie is Squall… isn’t he?
I want the old boards back to use the embarrassed icon :-(
How many metalliasslickers did you think this board had?
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 10:10 in reply to an earlier post
#23
Squall wrote:
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 11:20
#24
buffalo-boy wrote:
Actually I am everybody on here, Charlie…its just me, you and lots of my alter-egos. : )
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 13:51
#25
Dennis (Dudley Less) wrote:
It has gone a bit on the snipey side here, lately.
Can’t we all just have a big hug?
Loosen that clothing, take your trousers off, throw of fthe shackles of your pants and socks and come closer…
ahem…
erm
Yep, I, erm, I like the new layout, Rene. Nice job. And that last Therapy? webgig, eh? Cracking! Great stuff. Not a second of man-love in it either. Cracking.
*quickly gets dressed*
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 14:13
#26
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
yes, big hugs all round :D
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 14:43
#27
Squall wrote:
I’ll just watch thanks :)
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 17:12
#28
g (Does everything start with destruction?) wrote:
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 17:24
#29
Squall wrote:
Anyway - back on topic - what does everyone prefer about the NEW wom :)
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 17:40
#30
Graeme55? (Graeme Williams) wrote:
hard to explain dude, but i think its because people are so used to it now they dont want to change it back.
now dennis about that hug. :D:P
Posted on Tue, 7 October 2008 at 22:06
