#211
Pip (Philip Kelly) wrote:
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (The Movie) , Street Fighter (The Movie) and Mortal Kombat (The Movie) and any other bad adapation Movies that pissed all over my happy childhood memories :-(
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 10:25
#212
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Divers wrote:
The weather man, I pretty much think cage is a c**t anyway so that’s a good start but it wasn’t amusing the acting poor and a dull story line… I think michael Caine is great but his accent in this I haven’t a clue where he is from.
That got great reviews. I have no idea why.
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 11:05 in reply to an earlier post
#213
Jobrok (John O)))) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 11:50
#214
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
A couple of really bad movies I saw quite recently were Terminator Salvation and Cutthroats (mid-90s pirate thing). They’re both crap.
Jason X is probably the worst movie I’ve seen at the cinema. So bad it was quite funny though.
I didn’t mind Weather Man at all, although the camel toe stuff was totally unnecessary.
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 18:06
#215
glen wrote:
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 18:06
#216
glen wrote:
Epitome wrote:
A couple of really bad movies I saw quite recently were Terminator Salvation and Cutthroats (mid-90s pirate thing). They’re both crap.
Jason X is probably the worst movie I’ve seen at the cinema. So bad it was quite funny though.
I didn’t mind Weather Man at all, although the camel toe stuff was totally unnecessary.
Ohhhh lol Jason X, its so bad i forgot all about it
although i enjoyed Terminator Salvation, it was way better than T3
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 18:08 in reply to an earlier post
#217
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
T3 was fun, I liked it. Salvation had about the worst bunch of actors ever gathered for one movie, woodenly reading lines from a script which I really hope was a first draft and was OK’d without anyone bothering to read through it (if not, and they actually put some effort into the script then I seriously worry for them). Other than the high budget CGI it felt more like a crappy American sci-fi TV show than a major movie.
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 18:10
#218
RoyBatty (Steve) wrote:
Yeah. That about sums it up — if said crappy Americans are really a borderline talentless Australian and a growly Brit drifting in and out of various accents, some probably nonexistent. :-)
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 19:59
#219
wildsam6o (Sam Wilkins) wrote:
Super Hans wrote:
the league of gentlemen movie was so unbelievably shite not only did we turn it off, we smashed the disc
i like this!!!!! good man,
busty cops 2, most cheezy low budget/action.adventure/prono EVER
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 20:21 in reply to an earlier post
#220
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
^^
ooooh, I’m off to the video shop!
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 21:03
#221
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
Interesting to read what people consider “bad”. I loved Lost in Translation and such others too. And although films like Terminator Salvation (better than T3 of course) isn’t as a bad as say… the S Club 7 movie is it? I mean theres bad movies, but then theres really REALLY bad movies, like total cack!
Example: Bio Dome ;)
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 23:16
#222
andys gibson sg (James Harris) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 14 April 2010 at 23:18
#223
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
andys gibson sg wrote:
Interesting to read what people consider “bad”. I loved Lost in Translation and such others too. And although films like Terminator Salvation (better than T3 of course) isn’t as a bad as say… the S Club 7 movie is it? I mean theres bad movies, but then theres really REALLY bad movies, like total cack!
Example: Bio Dome ;)
I haven’t seen the S-Club 7 movie, but I suppose there is a chance that it could be worse than Terminator Salvation. T3 was way, way better than Salvation though - I think a score of 1/10 for Salvation is a fair score, so I really don’t think things could be much worse. It really did seem like a film written and acted by talentless school boys who somehow found multi-million dollar funding.
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 00:52 in reply to an earlier post
#224
Fiona (Fiona Lamont) wrote:
andys gibson sg wrote:
Interesting to read what people consider “bad”. I loved Lost in Translation and such others too. And although films like Terminator Salvation (better than T3 of course) isn’t as a bad as say… the S Club 7 movie is it? I mean theres bad movies, but then theres really REALLY bad movies, like total cack!
Example: Bio Dome ;)
I know the world seemed to love Lost In Translation - I didn’t say it was ‘bad’ - I just didn’t get it I guess. Perhaps too intellectual for me lol - I like being entertained and that didn’t entertain me :-D
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 09:04 in reply to an earlier post
#225
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
I agree Fiona, could not understand the fuss about that film at all… it was just dull.
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 11:06
#226
Gav wrote:
Great soundtrack though.
Actually I quite liked it.
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 11:16
#227
RoyBatty (Steve) wrote:
I liked it as well. Though, being essentially plotless, I can understand why others didn’t. I thought Bill Murray’s performance was both hilarious and nuanced.
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 14:27
#228
MisterHoppy (Jamie) wrote:
Fist of the Northern Star: Not the animated film, the shite version with some very bad acting in. The series is amazing, and the animated film is just a condensed version of the series, but this was so bad in comparison it was painful.
Unrelated to above:
Have we got a thread for ‘Films that are so bad their good’ anywere?
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 17:14
#229
Prison Breaker (Katy Russ) wrote:
I totally agree with Fiona and Sarah about Lost in Translation. I have a few friends whose tastes are similar to mine and loved it but I just found it really boring. Some of the cinematography was good but any decent plot, characters, dialogue, humour, meaning etc. all seemed to be lacking in my opinion. Clearly not something I should have bothered going to the cinema to see. The other film my friends loved and told me I would love but didn’t is Donnie Darko. Am I alone in not enjoying that film?
Obviously neither are the worst film I’ve seen though. Competitors for that title which spring to mind immediately are:
-Speed 2, Cruise Control
-Tape
-Mission Impossible 2
-Blair Witch Project
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 17:25
#230
RoyBatty (Steve) wrote:
I actually rather liked MI 2, but the rest of your list is very spot on. A film that springs to mind that garnered great reviews, award noms, etc. that really did nothing for me was Gosford Park. It was okay, I guess, but I didn’t see what the fuss was all about.
Posted on Thu, 15 April 2010 at 17:30
#231
Stop it you're killing me (Julie) wrote:
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 08:10
#232
Prison Breaker (Katy Russ) wrote:
I’ve since remembered two offensively bland, unenjoyable and pretentious piece of crap films I wasted some of my life watching:
-Closer
-Matchpoint
Both solely focus on relationships of characters I didn’t like or care about and seemed to think they were very deep but I didn’t understand why. The awfulness of Matchpoint was particularly upsetting as it’s a Woody Allen film and Woody Allen used make great films. What was he thinking?
I guess at least stuff like MI2 isn’t pretending to be deep. I’ve seen Gosford Park but I don’t remeber it very well which probably means I was fairly indifferent to it.
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 10:50
#233
Thefanthattriedtostrangleitslf wrote:
Charlie’s Angels
I have difficulties thinking up an equally crappy movie, though there was one I forgot the title of. It’s about a bunch of women who all want to commit suicide and it’s about some writer or other. But it had good parts and is in no way as bullshitty as CA’s was.
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 13:45
#234
Fiona (Fiona Lamont) wrote:
Alan wrote:
Nope, I reckon my film came along shortly afterwards, riding on the coat-tails of Bloodsport. There were no big names in it from what I recall, just unknowns slaying eachother in pretty gruesome circumstances!
Wasn’t American Samuri by any chance?
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 15:19 in reply to an earlier post
#235
smeghead (Anna) wrote:
The remake of The Wickerman.
It was a painful experience.
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 16:51
#236
Prison Breaker (Katy Russ) wrote:
Thefanthattriedtostrangleitslf wrote:
Though there was one I forgot the title of. It’s about a bunch of women who all want to commit suicide and it’s about some writer or other. But it had good parts and is in no way as bullshitty as CA’s was.
Do you mean The Hours and the writer Virginia Woolf? I haven’t ever got round to seeing it despite having every intention of doing so.
Nor have I seen Charlie’s Angels but I’ve no desire to.
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 16:54 in reply to an earlier post
#237
Prison Breaker (Katy Russ) wrote:
smeghead wrote:
The remake of The Wickerman.
It was a painful experience.
There seem to be so many classic horror type films that have been remade now. I’m not personally a big fan of the genre (although I have seen the original Wickerman) but it still annoys me; just seems like a blatently futile, artless, money making exercise.
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 17:01 in reply to an earlier post
#238
RoyBatty (Steve) wrote:
Prison Breaker wrote:
I’ve since remembered two offensively bland, unenjoyable and pretentious piece of crap films I wasted some of my life watching:
-Closer
-Matchpoint
Geez. I actually liked both of those! :-D
But speaking of pretentious piles of crap, what about that Bob Dylan biopic-mess “I’m Not There?”
Posted on Fri, 16 April 2010 at 17:51 in reply to an earlier post
#239
Thefanthattriedtostrangleitslf wrote:
It’s Senile Bob, we disqualify him per definition : )
Prison Breaker wrote:
Do you mean The Hours and the writer Virginia Woolf? I haven’t ever got round to seeing it despite having every intention of doing so.
Nor have I seen Charlie’s Angels but I’ve no desire to.
Yeah, the Hours. I suppose it could work for once but it’s not a movie that’s interesting enough to see more than once.
Charlie’s Angels was such crap that I’m still wondering why I didn’t shut the tele off - it was probably because my sister was watching it. Still she didn’t like it either, I suppose. John Cleese actually makes an appearance and all he gets to do the whole movie long is looking like a surprised tard, making it so even he can’t still make something of it or get some good parts in.
Posted on Sat, 17 April 2010 at 10:25 in reply to an earlier post
#240
Alan wrote:
Fiona wrote:
Wasn’t American Samuri by any chance?
YES!! That’s it! I’ve just checked the youtube vid’s. You’re a legend Fiona, I owe you a pint! Thanks a mil.
Posted on Sat, 17 April 2010 at 15:35 in reply to an earlier post
