#31
Gav wrote:
I keep hearing a ‘st-anger’ snare sound!
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:22
#32
Gav wrote:
I like the album, I really like Living In The Shadow… Before You, With You, After You, Dead Hand & Ecclesiastes
Not over keen on The Buzzing & Stark Raving Sane, but they’ll probably grow on me
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:26
#33
White Psycho wrote:
LITSOATT, Dead Hand, Marlow are the stand outs so far for me.
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:34
#34
Squall wrote:
^ Stark Raving Sane grew on me in a big way… :)
I read the album is a bit weird and a grower . But If I enjoy ” Lulu ” - I’m sure i’ll love this ;) . I enjoy the challenge of difficult music occasionally.
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:40
#35
White Psycho wrote:
You managed to enjoy Lulu? :-/ Fair enough I suppose. Couldn’t stand it myself.
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:42
#36
Squall wrote:
deadsetgav wrote:
I keep hearing a ‘st-anger’ snare sound!
That’s a Therapy? staple since Teethgrinder !
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:55 in reply to an earlier post
#37
White Psycho wrote:
Just listened to Ecclesiastes…WOW!
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 21:56
#38
Squall wrote:
White Psycho wrote:
You managed to enjoy Lulu? :-/ Fair enough I suppose. Couldn’t stand it myself.
It has great production ( for once ) and I don’t mind spoken word type vocals.
There are a couple of tracks where Lou sounds particularly bad but I don’t mind most of it where he’s speaking instead of singing.
And I enjoy the music for the most part.
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 22:02 in reply to an earlier post
#39
White Psycho wrote:
Fair enough, just did absolutely zero for me.
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 22:11
#40
Squall wrote:
It’s easier to listen to than St. Anger at least and Beyond Magnetic is pretty good for an EP :)
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 22:13

#41
Alan wrote:
The single and BYWYAF are stellar Therapy-esque melodic tunes, these two are far more in keeping with typical Therapy? than the rest of the album.
Plague Bell: didn’t like it but it’s definately growing on me after repeated listens.
I can hear strong similarities between Magic Mountain and Marlow, but the latter really hits the mark unlike MM. I really hated MM, but I like Marlow so much I think it would make a great single. Very strong track.
The first 90 seconds of The Buzzing reminds me of Other Peoples Misery, and then the crazy dub section comes in… love it.
Get Your Dead Hand continues the dub theme, a real stand-out track. Indicitive of how they always try something new, and invariably, it works. Certainly no Troublegum part 2 here :)
Ghost Trio or Why Turbulence: As I type this, gotta admit I don’t remember what either of these sound like! Yet to make impressions, obviously.
Stark Raving Sane I didn’t think much of when I heard it on the Metal Hammer cd, but the riff has really grown on me after, again, repeated listens.
Ecclesiastes is a pure trip, reminding me of the French band Air (which I mentioned in another thread). Beautiful stuff, one of the best tracks.
So far I’d rate the album above Crooked Timber. It’s definately a Top 3 contender. :)
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 22:23
#42
Simon (Simon) wrote:
deadsetgav wrote:
Not over keen on The Buzzing & Stark Raving Sane, but they’ll probably grow on me
Yeah they are my least favourite.. the buzzing isn’t bad, very different and some really cool stuff going on.. kind of stands out on the album and changes the flow as it’s not exactly catchy. Stark Raving Sane… I love the verses and other parts just not a fan of the chorus.
Apart from that I think the albums a winner… overall not my favourite album by them but there are tracks on the album which are some of the best they have ever done.. the production I really like.. lots of space and nice and clear not heavily compressed which is good.
It is a short album but it makes me want to play it again and again so that’s a good thing.. hopefully get to hear the others tracks the recorded.. a string of E.P’s like they did with Shortsharpshock/Opal Mantra/Face The strange would be cool :)
Posted on Mon, 30 January 2012 at 22:42 in reply to an earlier post
#43
MisterHoppy wrote:
Just shows we’re a diverse bunch - we all seem to like different bits! Magic Mountain (where’s the FULL version T?) for me was one of the best things they’ve ever done (but then I like and listen to a lot of instrumental music like that) and Marlowe doesn’t quite match up to it and it’s my favourite track on the album, but fairly different tracks to my ears so not easy (and probably fair) to compare. A different album again and that’s a good thing, much as I loved CT I wasn’t expecting them to make a Mark 2 of it, got to move forward and this record is yet another step in the constant evolution of their sound, one of the reasons I’m still anticipating each release they make after 19 years of listening to them.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 00:08
#44
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
I still haven’t heard it, but I like that it’s another fairly different style for them - that’s one of the thing’s that makes them so interesting and one of my favourite bands. I probably still have a week to wait till I get it.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 00:11
#45
garymartian (Gary Martin) wrote:
Plague bell, the buzzing, get your dead hand.. ghost trio, and ecclesiastes are my favourites so far, and as a whole, I can’t fault it at all, it takes you on a wild ride. :)
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 06:23
#46
soul doubt (an) wrote:
garymartian wrote:
If you ordered from global before the 23rd of jan, you should have it by now. (depending on your postman)
I want a new postman! :(
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 08:35 in reply to an earlier post
#47
kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:
deffo a grower,deffo a winner!
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 08:42

#48
Dermot wrote:
The standout track for me so far is “Why Turbulence”. Great lyrics. Funny to see the progression of Therapy?’s lyrics over the years… songs on Troublegum, Nurse, Infernal Love etc were all about being on your own / getting dumped / twisted relationships / guilty messed up sex etc. But now the lyrics are stuff like “I have food, shelter, a family who love me and who I love back” - but where do you go from here? Other songs in recent albums have been about similar things… “Clowns Galore” (What do we do now that we are happy?) and “Unconsoled” (we made it to the suburbs) etc etc. Back to “Why Turbulence”, I just think it walks the right line between humour and darkness that always made T? stand out for me… very like Beckett in fact (“Big Black Hooded Perambulator” is a line from the Beckett play Krapp’s Last Tape). “Birth Was The Death Of Me” - good line. Read an interview with T? on the internet that said it’s called “Why Turbuelnce” because that’s what a leading physicist said he would ask God if he met him (apparently turbulence can’t be properly scientifically explained).
Other fav track so far is Ecclesiastes. I kept waiting for a monster riff to kick in that (thankfully) never came. I’d like to hear T? do more songs in this style tbh but can’t see it happening any time sooon. The expression “There Is Nothing New Under The Sun” comes from Ecclesiastes (“everything under the sun… is absurd”).
Will have to give it a few more listens before I form an opinion overall. I know they’ve said otherwise but I do think it follows in a similar vein from Crooked Timber (which I liked) in terms of a filthy bass, similar thematic concerns, similar “feel” albeit with more of a dub influence (more “space to breathe” as a WOMble on here put it very well). I agree that “The Buzzing” is a bit jarring. But so far I’d definitely rank ABCOL above NANE, OCFA, and HA.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 08:43
#49
Standinline wrote:
soul doubt wrote:
Might go for that too ;-)
On the other hand, I got the livealbum 1 week in advance from Global Music, so this time I have to wait for the CD to arrive …;-)
It´s great to wait for a CD to come…to see the package and unwrapp it:-)
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 12:45 in reply to an earlier post
#50
Alan wrote:
Alan wrote:
Ghost Trio or Why Turbulence: As I type this, gotta admit I don’t remember what either of these sound like! Yet to make impressions, obviously.
Listened some more…
Ghost Trio sounds, musically, like Fear of God from OCFA, except better, with a nice drone-y outro section.
Why Turbulence reminds me of Enjoy The Struggle: not a bad thing.
Both these songs seem like ‘growers’ to me, pretty much like the whole album. By this time next year, it could well be a bona-fide classic :-D
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 14:02 in reply to an earlier post
#51
KJC Dublin (Karl) wrote:
for me Ghost Trio sounds like it building up to something epic, but never quite gets there. Still haven’t warmed to Marlow yet either.
The standout tracks for me remain BYWYAY and Get your dead hand off of my shoulder (also love Plague Bell, Living in the shadow and Stark Raving Sane)
Otherwise after repeated listens I am a happy camper - as mentioned before however, I don’t see why the album couldn’t have been 3-4 tracks longer (it is very short!)
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 14:10
#52
kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:
When I 1st time heard Ecclesiastes from my stereos at home I almost started cryin, so touchy, so beautiful! And this is the song my wife was most horrified cause of that electric sound on Andy´s vocals. Now she also loves it:D
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 14:35
#53
chr1s (I can't remember my own name) wrote:
KJC Dublin wrote:
Otherwise after repeated listens I am a happy camper - as mentioned before however, I don’t see why the album couldn’t have been 3-4 tracks longer (it is very short!)
Agreed. It’s around 40 mins, which seems to be the average for a lot of albums these days, but it does seem very short. I had it on in work earlier, and when it finished playing i thought it’d be lunchtime, but it was still too early :(
Kossu wrote:
And this is the song my wife was most horrified cause of that electric sound on Andy´s vocals.
He sounds like a sulky robot :D
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 14:40 in reply to an earlier post
#54
KJC Dublin (Karl) wrote:
Yup, that would be my main beef - they recorded 22 or so songs and only 10 made the album.
With other bands it usually obvious why material didn’t make albums, but there are usually plenty of gems with omitted Therapy? material (as evident on all the B-Sides).
Anyways, don’t mean to come across negative - I think the album is great and I can’t stop listening.
Will be interesting to see which tracks make the live set in the upcoming tour…
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 14:48
#55
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
I was already disappointed about this too, although I haven’t heard the album yet. What happened to the days when they’d have 13 or 14 songs on an album. Crooked Timber only had 10, but it was still one of their longest albums. 10 songs at around 40 minutes does seem short and even more disappointing if they really did record several more songs. I feel T? should be more ambitious and go for an album of over an hour one day.
Course, this was just a slight niggle for me when I saw the track list and length on Amazon a while ago, but hopefully any disappointment will go when I finally hear it :-)
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 15:09
#56
Alan wrote:
I remember Michael saying that he hated albums longer than 45 minutes as his attention would wander. So I think this philosphy extends to Therapy? albums as a result.
In all fairness though, I do find that quality control is important and a lot of the “classic” albums happened to be released in the 1970’s as a result of only having the space to fit >45 minutes of material on a vinyl. A lot of newer albums which have more than 60 minutes do tend to stretch one’s patience!
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 15:34

#57
Thefanthattriedtostrangleitslf wrote:
MisterHoppy wrote:
You listen to a fair bit of dub Simon, do you hear these dub elements people have mentioned? Cos I don’t really and I listen to lots of dub, might just be my bass isn’t set high enough though. I’m enjoying the use of space in this one as well, given that aside from reggae / dub I mostly listen to what’s termed post rock nowadays I hear it used a lot, nice to hear it within a more aggressive rock sound again, as I felt CT employed it as well.
A friend of my is a DJ. I was curious about all these ‘dub elements’ people keep mentioning so I let him listen to a couple of tracks. He didn’t hear any of it at all, then sent me a link of Korn’s dub album for an example (which I wouldn’t touch with a six foot pole even if it was preemptively nuked). Suffice to say it might work to inspire them, which is good, but the music is still completely different, and that’s good too.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 16:15 in reply to an earlier post
#58
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
Most of my favourite albums are over an hour long. My overall favourite album is two hours long. I usually have a terrible attention span, but not when it comes to listening to good music :-D
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 17:15

#59
MisterHoppy wrote:
Thefanthattriedtostrangleitslf wrote:
A friend of my is a DJ. I was curious about all these ‘dub elements’ people keep mentioning so I let him listen to a couple of tracks. He didn’t hear any of it at all, then sent me a link of Korn’s dub album for an example (which I wouldn’t touch with a six foot pole even if it was preemptively nuked). Suffice to say it might work to inspire them, which is good, but the music is still completely different, and that’s good too.
You’re confusing Dub and Dubstep mate, and despite the name Dubstep didn’t evolve from dub, it’s (well was back in 98 when the term first came about) a sort of combination of the darker elements of drum and bass and 2-step (a form of garage (not garage rock though) which is even shitter than most garage) before it evolved into what you hear today, DUB on the other hand is the forerunner to remixes (in fact a lot of the early dub pioneers were soundsystem engineers, King Tubby was an electrician and soundsystem operator), it’s a subset of reggae and often involves just the rhythm section of a track (sometimes cut up and re-dubbed) with loops of other instruments and sometimes snippets of vocals dropped in and out with a heavy use of reverb , echo and delay. It quickly became very popular within reggae so you got bands and producers making dub albums without using a vocal track as the starting point (the fact Jamaica didn’t have any copyright laws at the time helped a lot initially).
Basically Reggae has always had very very deep and heavy bass, dub took this a bit further and that’s why dubstep with it’s heavy heavy basslines got dub in its name.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 18:02 in reply to an earlier post
#60
MisterHoppy wrote:
Korns album is dubstep btw.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 18:05