#991
MisterHoppy wrote:
^I nominate you as most out of it WOMble for posting in the wrong thread at 2am ;-)
Posted on Sun, 11 December 2011 at 16:59
#992
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
Well, as long as I’m nominated for something, I’m happy!
Posted on Sun, 11 December 2011 at 17:48
#993
Erik Schepers (Erik Schepers) wrote:
Great. An unread message for me. And it’s spam.
Yeah, so I decided to come by once more (my life over the past few years has been quite interesting, ranging from involuntarily getting involved in fights to relatives passing away), I noticed an unread message to me, I get all excited, and guess what? It’s freaking spam.
Posted on Wed, 14 December 2011 at 00:58
#994
Cuchulain wrote:
I like spam , although it’s hard to choose between going for the millions of dollars that Nigerian king is gonna send me or all the Russian babes throwing themselves at me.
Think I’ll go with the Russian babes as it’s easy to combine with all those free penis enlargements.
Posted on Wed, 14 December 2011 at 09:18
#995
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
I keep getting invitations to ‘meet Christian sinles in my area’ :-(
Posted on Wed, 14 December 2011 at 10:02
#996
MisterHoppy wrote:
Burns night - Haggis, Neeps, Tatties and Whisky, oh yes.
Posted on Wed, 25 January 2012 at 09:59
#997
interzone (incubus seeking succuba) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 25 January 2012 at 18:29
#998
Simon (Simon) wrote:
Just trying to start mine off early with his musical education… Just needs some growing to do!
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 07:41
#999
realityfuck (Jar lath) wrote:
That’s a great pic Divers.
Posted on Tue, 31 January 2012 at 20:25
#1,000
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Posted on Wed, 1 February 2012 at 15:02
#1,001
DVesnov (Denis Vesnov) wrote:
-27 in Russia.
too cold without alcohol therapy
Posted on Wed, 1 February 2012 at 15:39
#1,002
kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:
-20 here in Tampere at the moment and they said that it will around -30 in the night. I´m doing a nightshift after a long time, but thank god I dont have to work outside:D
Posted on Wed, 1 February 2012 at 16:33
#1,003
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Woo, stay safe guys, its only hovering around freezing in London.
I do not have a harem.
Posted on Wed, 1 February 2012 at 20:39
#1,004
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
Dude, you so have a harem :p
Posted on Wed, 1 February 2012 at 23:59
#1,005
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Okay here’s the run-down:
CGAW is supposed to be my friend, but hardly ever talks to me unless she has to or wants something but when asked whats up says nothing’s up and still comes round for tea which she yums up (including two bowls of chestnut veloute last week)
AGAW is a friend, she invited me to her wedding and so on.
TGAW is someone I don’t really know very well but who has started being v chatty over email, much more so than CGAW, which kinda just underlines how annoyingly annoying CGAW is being. She (CGAW) used to act much more like AGAW but then started being weird and I have no idea what triggered it
Posted on Thu, 2 February 2012 at 09:39
#1,006
Gav wrote:
For the record - are you single now or do you still have a girl at home?
Posted on Thu, 2 February 2012 at 12:51
#1,007
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Girlfriend is still very much at home, which is why the word ‘friend’ is not being italised. She likes AGAW, doesn’t like CGAW, has never met TGAW and asked me about her when she (TGAW) ‘liked’ a picture of me on Facebook, then said she felt conflicted when I told her thatCGAW doesn’t think much of TGAW.
Posted on Thu, 2 February 2012 at 13:40
#1,008
MisterHoppy wrote:
Seriously, you need to STOP inviting CGAW around for food, that’s not helping anything - if she only talks to you when she wants something then she’s not worth even looking at, let alone talking to, let alone cooking for!
TGAW sounds like she LIKES you, could get real awkward with GF!
Alternately CGAW might also like you but knows you’re with GF and that won’t change and therefore is pissed about the whole thing.
Actually given my relationship history of the last 18 months or so since my last long term one ended I would discount EVERYTHING I’ve just said.
Posted on Thu, 2 February 2012 at 18:36
#1,009
MisterHoppy wrote:
Oh and good luck - you’re going to need it!
Posted on Thu, 2 February 2012 at 18:36
#1,010
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
I think things are probably pretty straightforward with TGAW, its just kinda annoying that someone who’s a (supposedly) close friend makes less effort than someone who isn’t.
CGAW is definitely worth looking at :-(, kinda wish she wasn’t. Problem with not inviting her round for dinner is that she and I both work closely with AGAW who comes for dinnerr & she’s best friends with another friend who also comes and I don’t want to put either of them in an awkward position. But its another 2 1/2 months before anyone comes round again, with the possible exception of an evening with me, g/f, AGAW & her husband.
I suspect CGAW finished off the office cupcakes last night…
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 09:56
#1,011
Gav wrote:
You need to run through those acronyms again cause you’ve lost me now.
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 10:41
#1,012
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
Cute girl at work
Awesome…
and, um,
Third
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 11:04
#1,013
Gav wrote:
I’ll print that off and keep it handy so I can follow the rest of the thread ;)
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 11:21
#1,014
hoochalobster (Sarah) Super Moderator wrote:
You should try following this thing live on twitter…
Straw poll - do the above three GAWs + one GF count as a harem?
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 17:10
#1,015
chr1s (I can't remember my own name) wrote:
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 18:26
#1,016
MisterHoppy wrote:
1 Bloke + 4 Women = Harem
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 18:47
#1,017
Citizen Erased (confused again) wrote:
:-p at the 3 of you!
On the grounds that I only sleep with one of them IT’S NOT A HAREM!
g/f now having to work tomorrow and has suggested I go photogrpah some wildlife with CGAW.
That possibly sounds more euphemistic than it should.
Posted on Fri, 3 February 2012 at 18:53
#1,018
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
Shall we dance, like we used to? Shall we dance, just like the old days?
Posted on Fri, 10 February 2012 at 16:27
#1,019
MisterHoppy wrote:
Not if it’s just like the old days, if you’ve got the knack of not standing on my toes with those 3” stilettos then lets boogie ;-)
Posted on Fri, 10 February 2012 at 18:56
#1,020
Epitome (Dave) wrote:
I was hoping your toes would’ve numbed with age by now! :-D
Posted on Sat, 11 February 2012 at 01:52
