#241
Jobrok wrote:
Like I said on PAGE 3 of this thread.
“Let’s hold judgement ‘till we know for sure what happened.”
Glad I did. There’s usually a simple explanation for things like this.
And Mikehell!!!!
Thanks for finally shutting up the Doubting Thomas’.
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 08:09
#242
Citizen Erased wrote:
I was thinking that it wasn’t that long ago when we had to rely on Funny Farm and any news the NME thought fit to print, so really it is somewhat out of order to expect/demand an instant statement. So, um, sorry Mikehell.
I was also thinking that after every line-up change, T? have always come back with a fantastic album - Semi-detached rocks, as does High Anxiety, which bodes v well for the future! :D
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 09:21
#243
FieFox wrote:
3ddo-on-the-balcony wrote:
All right FieFox, in that case I misinterpreted you. Sorry.
Of course you misunderstood me…I have nothing but great respect for Martin !!!!
Ok…it’s forgotten…apoligy accepted ;)
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 09:41

#244
Isness wrote:
I decided not to respond until the official word was out… I think it’s very interesting, though. Some of my favourite bands have created some of my favourite albums due to internal struggles to move in other directions. I think different people pulling the band different ways can make it far more creative and exciting than ever. However, it can sometimes make the band unfocussed, and perhaps cause too much strain within the group, which is probably the case here. Still, with T?s history, I was slightly surprised to find this was the reason.
On the other hand, I can’t think of a better reason, so maybe I’m just not thinking straight. ;)
Anyway, whilst most of my favourite T? music comes from the period when Martin was in the band, I still have hope that the guys will come up with another surprising and excellent album next (I’m hoping for another style change again ;))
Good luck with everything, Martin, if you’re reading - you’re a fantastic musician and, from what I’ve read, a top guy, so I’ll look into any projects of yours immediately, and. Yeah. That’s that. :)
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 10:37

#245
ColdEthyl? wrote:
rocking roxy wrote:
i think, if we would have get immediately a better explanation, than just this short note, then there wouldn’t have been all those speculations…
and i think it’s normal, that if things are going on strange, the brain starts working, cause you want to find an explanation for what’s going on, or not…
i also don’t understand what’s wrong, if you want to know what really happens…
i know, some people don’t want to know, and just want to listen to the cd’s and have a good time at the concerts…i think so too, with other bands…but when it’s concerning your most favorit band, for which you care most, isn’t it normal then, if you are expecting an answer?
so now we finally got it…and we can sleep better now. thank you michael.
concerning to writing to the con (and probabaly i should shut up now): as we all had to wait so long here for a reply, why should people would have wrote to the con to ask for…wouldn’t that have been the same result?
And though it took Michael quite a time to come out of the closet with the answer: Personally I’m glad to be a fan of a band taking their fans seriously enough to give explanations at all.
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 12:37
#246
Alex wrote:
irishlady wrote:
as for mailing to c.o.n. i agree w/ roxy
and to be honest, i don´t think there would have been an anwer on this matter
I didn’t even think that mail box was checked any more!
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 13:39
#247
WickedMan wrote:
hello all,
martin here again after a long time not being on the w.o.m…
just wanted to say sth. to the martin left T? because of financial reasons thing
i can´t understand at all how anyone can think that martin has left T? due to money conflicts. everyone who knows T? and martin mc c. knows the band is like a family and everyone was equal, it was a giving and taking, no one was like he wanted to be a superstar or wanted to make a big carreer
it was all about doing what they liked most- playing together and touring. there´s a reason why T? sometimes like to dissociate from the success of troublegum, many fans don´t even think about that (i`m sick and tired of going nowhere
)
you just had to look at martin during a show and you knew he was doing what he loved most.
well, that´s my point of view
greetings to ya all,
martin
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 14:21
#248
Ronald wrote:
Thanks Mike for the explanation, but no surprises there actually,and for Robby and some other” Supporters”. Stop thinking you owe Therapy? just because you have seen them loads of times, just because you have talked to the lads loads of times, just because you have got loads of setlists etc. I have really had it with your InternetBehaviour,it’s so childish: “I saw Mikehell was online a minute ago and he didn’t reply”…STOP IT!
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 16:46
#249
RobbyVDH wrote:
What the hell is your problem?
Did I ever say anywhere that the band owes me anything?
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 17:52
#250
kossu (Petri Koskiniemi) wrote:
Thanks Mikehell and Vemmy for REALLY GOOD messages. I don´t usually write here cause I´m really bad on writing in english and I don´t want people to get me wrong (Im really good at reading the messages), heh, but Michael and Vemmy said it all in they´re topics…
Therapy? is GREAT but it ISN`T THE WHOLE LIFE…
Michael, Andy and Neil, see U in an week in St. Petersburg in Russia!!Really waiting forward to see you!
OnehellofafinnishmuthafuckaTherapyhelloffafanna,hehhah
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 20:02

#251
HurricaneHolgi (Holgi) wrote:
MIKEHELL wrote:
Hello all. Michael McKeegan here…just wanted to clear up a few misconceptions regarding Martin’s departure. Basically what happened was that Neil, Andy and myself found ourselves moving in a different musical direction to Martin. We felt it would be a compromise to continue in a situation where neither we nor Martin were happy and that the best way to realise this was to revert to a trio. As we hinted before, this was the hardest decision we ever had to make, as Martin is a great guy and one of the best musicians around…but we thought we should address the situation now rather than let the creative and personal relationships deteriorate. I know it was a big shock for most people but to be honest the band probably wouldn’t have continued the way it was.
While we’re on the subject I just wanted to say how disappointed I was by the reactions from some of the people on the message boards. To suggest in any fashion that the split was due to MONEY is absolutely absurd and those involved should hang their heads in shame. It was interesting to see that some of the people voicing their theories loudest, are some of the same people who were previously quick to email us demanding guestlist or hard to find releases. However, in this instance, not one of them bothered to contact us direct at the churchofnoise and ask what had happened or how things were. Weak.
Anyway, let’s be positive. I feel any change is good, if initially weird, but to be honest life goes on and I know we have a ton of killer new songs and that Martin will come up with a cool new project. On behalf of Andy, Martin, Neil and myself I’d like to thank all the genuine people who have given us their support and wished us well in the future..we genuinely appreciate it…
Michaelx
You are daammmmmnn right!!
“Champagne for our real friends…”
Cheers T? & Martin!! Good Luck in the future!!
E.
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 20:19
#252
trigger wrote:
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 20:25
#253
3ddo-on-the-balcony (eddo) wrote:
The word is out now, we know what happened and why, so can we please stop pissing each other off?
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 21:05
#254
Red_Mist wrote:
You said it dude, we know the reasonings behind it now, so lets all get back to being one big happy WoM’s family again, who appreciate T?
Peace ppl :D
Posted on Fri, 26 March 2004 at 21:20
#255
Kaatje wrote:
Posted on Sat, 27 March 2004 at 10:18
#256
Misanthropologist (d) wrote:
NO NO NO! we need more conspiracy theories! Pointless bickering! Random arguments! Insults thrown about the place!High blood pressures! LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS!
What are we ever going to gain by behaving with maturity?!
Oh, okay, then… ;):D
Posted on Sat, 27 March 2004 at 10:24

#257
belfagor wrote:
I’m not particularly keen on arguing through messages/posts, sitting in front of a computer. Therefore I really wish I won’t be upsetting anyone or starting new riots. However I couldn’t help noticing how ungrateful some people always seem to be…
By stating that if we’d been given an explanation much earlier in time we wouldn’t have started some silly conjectures (as if we’ve been watching too many soap operas on the telly) is a little offensive and lacks respect for a band that’s always been very open and honest to their fans.
Before Michael’s statement we (no, not all of us)were “angry” at them for keeping quiet on the matter of Martin leaving.
After the statement, besides having our curiosity fully satisfied, we seemed to feel attacked by some words, those of a band disappointed by what people they believed were faithful fans and distant friends had been thinking about them.
And that’s when the fans say, “Hey it’s your fault if we’d been doing that. You only had to clear things up before we started”. Thank you very much.
However you put it, it’s a no-win situation for Therapy?. It’s never our fault. I hate to be ironic, it gets on my nerves but is this what a band get by behaving just like anyone else? Being so down to earth, up for a chat and a beer anytime? Those who put themselves on pedestals are adored like gods, so…do you really have to behave that way to avoid situations like this?
Instead of wasting energy sending out negative thoughts, we should just put a full stop to the discussion and use that energy to continue supporting (mentally, emotinally and physically - hope that doesn’t sound too disturbing…)Andy, Neil and Michael more than ever during hard times and again wishing the best of lack to Martin McCarrick for his future plans. End of a cycle, new beginnings. Looking forward to whatever comes next :)
Oh, and I don’t think the number of shows one’s been attending should decide how much you care for the band. I guess if we knew how to turn cornflakes into gold or grow money as I grow basil in my garden we could just go anywhere we’d like! :p
Posted on Sat, 27 March 2004 at 11:17
#258
Shra-Mee wrote:
Words of wisdom!
Couldn´t agree more…
Posted on Sat, 27 March 2004 at 11:37
#259
Reverend Savage? wrote:
Shra-Mee wrote:
Really? Are you sure? :p
belfagor wrote:
I guess if we knew how to turn cornflakes into gold or grow money as I grow basil in my garden we could just go anywhere we’d like!
Posted on Sat, 27 March 2004 at 11:50
#260
Jason1310 wrote:
Wow, I’ve missed out on so much here :O
Sorry to see you go Martin- good luck with whatever you do. I’ll support you! :) Now lets give the remaining fellas the opportunity to do what they do best, and fuckin’ rock! :)
Posted on Sat, 27 March 2004 at 23:15
#261
yertle wrote:
Title: martin
hey,
not too pleased about this Martin business. i think we could do with some clarification of what lead to his departure. the news bulletin is pretty lacking as far as that’s concerned. for me the band is as much about the members as it is about the music and i’d like to know just how willing Martin was in all of this. i’m skipping future therapy? shows until i find out more because i get the impression someone being shafted here and that’s not what the band is about for me.
yertle.
Posted on Mon, 29 March 2004 at 08:07
#262
motherh666 wrote:
chrissake. Don’t skip live-shows or try and “punish” the band or any shit like that. that’s just fucking petty.
Posted on Mon, 29 March 2004 at 08:11
#263
JSar666 wrote:
yertle, go to page 7 and read Cooper’sdrummer’s post and page 11 for MIKEHELL’s post. That should be enough explanation.
As for not going to future gigs - your loss.
Posted on Mon, 29 March 2004 at 09:22
#264
Flo wrote:
I think that Michael explained enough in his post, we probably hear from Martin again someday.
It is so stupid to say that your not going to live shows again, you will only “punish” yourself!
Lets get over it and look at what the future brings!
Posted on Mon, 29 March 2004 at 17:50
#265
Citizen Erased wrote:
I <suspect that if you’d rather not go to see the band just because Martin left under these circumstances, then Andy, Michael and Neil would probably prefer that you kept your money too. You’re only going to miss out, but hey, your choice.
Me, I’ll still be down the front every chance I get.
Posted on Tue, 30 March 2004 at 19:57
#266
Sabotage wrote:
Am I out of touch or what!! Don’t log on to the internet for a few weeks and look what happens.
What a shock. :(
Thanks for all the happy times Martin. Miss you up there with the rest of T?
Good luck for the future.
Posted on Tue, 30 March 2004 at 21:47
#267
Ronald wrote:
Robby,I am not gonna send you any emails back so don’t bother. I just think loads of your comments are way out of order and if I want to say it here I will say it here and yes you are not the only one, there are others of whom I think they are going too far!
Posted on Wed, 31 March 2004 at 18:18
#268
Preacher wrote:
Let me just say thanks Martin, the contributions you made to the band were great and it won’t be the same without you.
That said, I was a T? fan when it was just Andy, Mike, and Fyfe and I’m still a T? fan now, throughout all of the changes. I’m sure things will work out the best for all parties, they always seem to.
Posted on Wed, 31 March 2004 at 18:51
#269
belfagor wrote:
Reverend Savage? wrote:
Alright, perhaps I should consider giving up Alchemy :p
Posted on Thu, 1 April 2004 at 16:23