Welcome to the brand new Therapy? message boards! Find out what’s new or give us your feedback.

3 Colours Red tour

#

Started by allroy

They’ll be touring Germany, how nice.

30.03. Wiesbaden - Schlachthof
31.03. Berlin - Mudd Club
01.04. Bielefeld - Forum (VISIONS Party)
02.04. Dortmund - FZW (VISIONS Party)
03.04. Hamburg - Molotow

Posted on Mon, 14 February 2005 at 23:36

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 35 by 11 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

#1

Divers (Simon) wrote:

I bought the first album and never really got into them, I did see the singer once when he played in Diamond head.

Posted on Tue, 15 February 2005 at 00:26

#2

belfagor wrote:

funnily enough i was a big fan, i nearly cried (no, i *did* cry) at reading festival during their last performance previous disbanding, yet when they re-formed i couldn’t get into them anymore :(
got to catch up with their last tunes! are they just gonna tour germany or other countries as well?

Posted on Tue, 15 February 2005 at 13:02

#3

allroy wrote:

Dunno, just found the German dates.

Posted on Tue, 15 February 2005 at 13:16

#4

RobbyVDH wrote:

Is Keith Baxter still on drums?

Posted on Tue, 15 February 2005 at 17:36

#5

jimmy wrote:

saw em in leeds at cockpit bout a year ago and they still had keith on drums but a new guitar player instead of ben harding, mcormack was a bit nasty to the new guy kept calling him a cunt (apparently he got some notes wrong or something)

Posted on Tue, 15 February 2005 at 18:08

#6

JSar666 wrote:

Don’t bother with the new album, it’s… middle-aged. It could in parts have been made by the current Manic Street Preacher line-up. Yes, it’s that bad. I expected so much more. The new guy is a complete pansy, his name is Paul Grant.

Posted on Thu, 17 February 2005 at 12:13

#7

jimmy wrote:

how is he a pansy???

Posted on Thu, 17 February 2005 at 17:04

#8

JSar666 wrote:

He… erm.. acts like a pansy?

By pansy I mean really, really camp, not that he’s gay. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that).

Interestingly, ‘Pure’ was voted the 82nd Best UK Rock album ever in Kerrang! this week.

Posted on Thu, 17 February 2005 at 17:44

#9

jimmy wrote:

ah just wondered, cant remember owt bout him, apart from he had dark hair and a guitar slung round his shoulders,

pure is total class, the first and the best (in my opinion)
its one of those instantly likeable albums though which gets boring after a few listens hate those things, yet i love them at the same time

Posted on Thu, 17 February 2005 at 18:12

#10

gb199 wrote:

JSar666 wrote:

Don’t bother with the new album, it’s… middle-aged.

I think it’s pretty good actually. Much more consistent than Revolt (although it lacks a really stand-out track like Paralyze). Doesnt come close to Pure though, whiich imho, is one of the finest albums ever!!

Posted on Thu, 17 February 2005 at 20:21

#11

JSar666 wrote:

I dunno, I really tried to like it and there is some good stuff on there. I like ‘Union of Souls’, ‘Repeat To Fade’ and ‘Lullaby’ and I do like parts of tracks, like the verse riff to ‘Made in Indonesia’ and the bass-line to ‘The World Is Yours’.

However, there are just too many weak tracks. ‘The World Is Yours’ just plods along at the same tempo all the way through. ‘Ceasefire’ is just not… good. It bores me to tears. ‘F.C.K.U.’ should have been a b-side, and that’s being generous. ‘Land of Debris’ is just pants. The vocal effect Pete uses at the end of the song makes me laugh hysterically. ‘Counterfeit Jesus’ starts off OK, but again gets boring really quickly and the cheerleading bit of C-O-C-A-I-N-E makes me laugh too. ‘Desensitize’ sounds like a bad version of Ash. And Ash themselves are bad enough.

All in all… not worth the cash, and considering they had about 5 years to write the damn thing, I’d expect a LOT more. It’d be fine if they’d released this quickly after a hectic tour/album schedule, but they haven’t. Surely they were writing songs during the split that didn’t make it onto GTA/Elevation releases? Where the fuck did that all go?

Posted on Fri, 18 February 2005 at 13:30

#12

jimmy wrote:

pete looks totally unpretentious in his sunglasses on stage though doesnt he?…hmm, KooL :cool:

Posted on Fri, 18 February 2005 at 17:34

#13

JSar666 wrote:

Yeah, he looks cool. In fact, I think he’s spent too much time working on his image lately instead of the music. How can you stand there singing all these self-righteous songs in hideously expensive designerwear?

Oh well, I’ve met and interviewed Pete and Chris and they were both really cool, so I guess I can’t diss them too badly.

Fun fact: I live in Pete’s neighbourhood.

Posted on Fri, 18 February 2005 at 19:24

#14

jimmy wrote:

they do seem cool in interviews, but they aint no rock stars, only slash can wear the sunglasses on stage and pull it of (in my opinion)

totally agree, too much time on the image of late

why did they get back together anyways? day jobs not going as planned?

they were better before they got signed, amazing following of live fans before they had an album out, true fucking great band, not necessarily groundbreaking but just great rock and roll, jack daniels all round!!, then for whatever reason, demands from record company bosses or lack of inspiration? they end up a shadow of their former-selves

all went wrong after beautiful day if you aske me

Posted on Sat, 19 February 2005 at 00:19

#15

JSar666 wrote:

I’ve never seen Pete live with sunglasses on… he did wear a suit (or mibbe just a blazer) the 2nd time I saw them live. Did you happen to catch Pete and Chris on Bruce Dickinson’s radio show on BBC6 last year? Bruce made Pete look like a complete twat. Pete was going on about how you shouldn’t buy your coffee at the big chains or buy clothes from the Gap and stuff like that and Bruce asked “well, where do you buy your clothes? Do you drink at Starbucks?” and Pete was like “errrrm…”. I don’t understand how Pete can afford new clothes all the time considering his band’s not famous anymore. I never see him wearing the same outfit twice. And apparently they have a tourbus and not a van, which surprises me. I think his gf is fairly well off.

They got together because their manager wanted to get some cash out of a few reunion shows. Pete’s Elevation band was in development hell (they recorded a full album that’s just sitting there because Sony don’t want to release it), GTA wasn’t really going anywhere and I guess they realised that 3CR was the best way of doing music full-time for them.

I think “Beautiful Day” was a bit of a turning point.. I think Pete’s ego grew a bit and he thought “well hang on, I can write a good song without all that distortion and it’ll sell”. I don’t really think the song is more than average, but whatever. ‘Revolt’ has some cracking tunes on it though, like “Age of Madness”. One of my favourite 3CR tracks for sure.

I just wish Pete would stop smoking so much weed.. the new songs lack the rage that ‘Pure’ brimmed with and his voice just sounds so shot most of the time. I bought the live DVD and he sounds awful.

Posted on Sat, 19 February 2005 at 11:39

#16

Bad Karma wrote:

JSar666 wrote:

Don’t bother with the new album, it’s… middle-aged. It could in parts have been made by the current Manic Street Preacher line-up. Yes, it’s that bad. I expected so much more.

The first time i heard The Union Of Souls i was very disappointed i just thought this is it?After five years away this is the best they could do 10 songs and an album just over half an hour.But after succesive plays i think the album is ok its not as good as Revolt or Pure the best 3 Colours Red album.I don’t think think theres anything on The Union Of Souls that is as bad as most of the songs on the last couple of Manics albums but i can understand the comparison.You’re are right about F.C.K.U.its the weakest track on the album.For the album number four the lads are going to have to produce something a bit more substantial.They do have a tour bus because in a Rocksound it showed a pic of it they were on tour with a band called Bitch Alert or something with Bitch in the title.I still haven’t bought the live DVD i don’t know whats wrong with me i keep forgetting about it.

Posted on Sun, 20 February 2005 at 14:46

#17

gb199 wrote:

Quote (author unknown):

[i]All in all… not worth the cash, and considering they had about 5 years to write the damn thing, I’d expect a LOT more.

They havent taken 5 years though, as they have all been in different bands so any material from the new album would’ve been fairly recent i would think.

Although it is safe to say the new album isnt the best, and I cant say I like the new political direction either (although I dont like any band being very political) I do think it’s more consistent and perhaps a bit better than Revolt, which had too many bad songs on it.

Actually got something through from their mailing list yesterday, and it looks like they are releasing a two cd set from their first two albums!! A best of and some b-sides. Bit bloody pathetic if you ask me after just two albums.

Posted on Wed, 23 February 2005 at 21:03

#18

jimmy wrote:

gb199 wrote:

Actually got something through from their mailing list yesterday, and it looks like they are releasing a two cd set from their first two albums!! A best of and some b-sides. Bit bloody pathetic if you ask me after just two albums.

:D…£££££££££££££££££££££££££

Posted on Thu, 24 February 2005 at 06:35

#19

Bad Karma wrote:

Heres the mail out for anyone not on on the 3 Colours Red mailing list.

Hello… Pete here, hope you’re good? Well it was about time for another update
anyway, so…

As I explained briefly in my last mail out, there will be a compilation album
put out through a division of the Sanctuary Record Group in the next couple of
months. What has happened is that Sanctuary have licensed the Creation Records
back catalogue, this includes other artists who signed to the label, it will not
be exclusive to us in any way.

This album would have come out… with or without our approval, or indeed -
A.N.Y money for myself, Chris, Keith, Paul… or Ben, so you may ask why I
became involved?

It was put to me that I could have a say in the artwork, tracklisting and sleeve
notes, initially I was dubious about the idea, but after a little thought, I got
to thinking that seeing as though this is a Creation ‘anthology’ and not a ‘best
of’ (it can’t be a ‘best of’ as it has no post 1999 tracks) then it’d be a good
way of rounding off a chapter of our lives, a time when it felt like we were
shot up to the moon. Also, back in the day, I used to read a few requests for
b-side compilations off the messageboard. Financial restraints stopped me from
getting the promo videos on to the disc as well, I guess you can’t have it
all…

(I also have a defect in my genes that makes me happy to work solidly on a
project for free… )

So… here is the ‘official’ running order:

DISC 1 - SINGLES AND LIVE / BBC - IN SESSION:
01. Paralyse
02. This Is My Hollywood
03. Pure
04. Nuclear Holiday
05. Beautiful Day
06. Sixty Mile Smile
07. This Is My Time (Radio Edit)
08. Copper Girl
09. Aniseed (hippodrome 17.6.96)
10. This Is My Hollywood (astoria 14.11.96)
11. Hateslick (newcastle 27.10.9
12. Pure (evening session 5.3.97)
13. Beautiful Day (evening session 21.1.99)
14. Paralyse (reading summer ‘99)

DISC 2 - B-SIDES AND ALBUM TRACKS:
01. God Shaped Hole
02. My Own Gauge
03. Fake Apology
04. If
05. Zip The Morals
06. Yellow Hair Carriage
07. Human Factory
08. On No-one’s Side
09. Throughbreeze
10. Inside
11. Til I’m Ready
12. Everything
13. Age Of Madness
14. Mental Blocks
15. Song On The Radio
16. Nerve Gas
17. Paranoid People
18. Calling To The Outside
19. Fit Boy And Faint Girl
20. Sunny In England

I have written an essay style brief band history, also, a few notes on the
singles themselves, as we speak, I am in the process of getting some shots of
the band for a collage in the artwork, and it’s coming together quite nicely…

As I’ve mentioned earlier, no-one here is making anything out of this and more
importantly, if you are against this kind of release then remember one thing:

No-one’s holding a gun to your head.

I’m not sure any business would employ me as a salesman, but that’s because I’m
not, and have never been a f**king salesman. My involvement stems purely from
the fact that I’m proud of our work. So there it is:

3 Colours Red -” If you ain’t got a weapon… you’ll never get a say”

Available in good record shops (and some crap ones too) soon…

On another note altogether… I am currently in the process of setting up a solo
acoustic show in London. Don’t look at listings just yet, as it isn’t confirmed
at the moment, but I am working on a night of slightly mellower 3cr material,
interjected with a few extremely choice cover versions. As soon as I have a date
set, I will stick it on the mailing list straight away. Hopefully it’ll be
sooner rather than later, the proceeds of this gig will go to the Tsunami relief
fund. I have only attempted one solo acoustic thing before now, when I played as
part of a Nick Drake tribute gig at the Barbican in Sept 2000, this time, I will
possibly have one or two friends joining me for what should be a cool night.

That’s me for now,
Skin up and chin up!
Vuckovic x

I would have a prefered a second CD of B-sides myself but for someone who doesn’t have the albums(i don’t know if this true but i read both Pure and Revolt have now been deleted) this anthology is a good introduction to 3 Colours Red and at £11.99 its good value.I’ll just be getting it for the live,BBC session tracks and B-sides(i have all the B-sides but mostly just as MP3’s)Like Pete said in his mail out this compilation was going to come out anyway regardless of any input from the band.Already this week Sanctuary have released a 2 CD Swervedriver compilation.

Posted on Sun, 6 March 2005 at 15:52

#20

Bad Karma wrote:

There’s a rumour flying about 3CR have split up again.

Posted on Sun, 18 September 2005 at 18:51

#21

not_that_kind_of_guy (a story on the radio) wrote:

Bad Karma wrote:

There’s a rumour flying about 3CR have split up again.

really? they’ve got a uk tour starting on tuesday.

Posted on Sun, 18 September 2005 at 19:19

#22

Bad Karma wrote:

I was just reading their message board it looks like it’s true and this tour is the last thing they will do as a band.
I use to really like them but i’m not that bothered about them splitting up again,i haven’t bought their last two releases the live DVD and the best of thingy.

Posted on Sun, 18 September 2005 at 19:58

#23

not_that_kind_of_guy (a story on the radio) wrote:

yeah, same here really. i loved the first two albums but then after they split up the first time i never really got back into them. i only ever saw them live once suppporting, ahem, bush.

Posted on Sun, 18 September 2005 at 20:08

#24

RobbyVDH wrote:

And you were there for Bush :eek: ?

Posted on Sun, 18 September 2005 at 20:13

#25

not_that_kind_of_guy (a story on the radio) wrote:

RobbyVDH wrote:

And you were there for Bush :eek: ?

bush as in the shite band from london. not as in the nutter muppet warlord from america. just to clear up any potential confusion there. :)

and yes, i was there for bush. it was a long time ago…

Posted on Sun, 18 September 2005 at 20:16

#26

Bad Karma wrote:

When they split last time they all had various projects that went tits up,i hope Pete tries to release his Elevation stuff now.

Posted on Mon, 19 September 2005 at 13:33

#27

Dusty (Chris Davies) wrote:

i know this is a bit of topic but the yo yo’s r supporting them any1 else like them.fucking quality.danny mccormack legend :D

Posted on Mon, 19 September 2005 at 17:13

#28

not_that_kind_of_guy (a story on the radio) wrote:

I’ve Got the knives? wrote:

i know this is a bit of topic but the yo yo’s r supporting them any1 else like them.fucking quality.danny mccormack legend :D

i saw the yo-yo’s ages ago supporting T? on the suicide pact tour. all very rock n roll as far as i recall… :)

Posted on Mon, 19 September 2005 at 18:27

#29

Dusty (Chris Davies) wrote:

not_that_kind_of_guy wrote:

i saw the yo-yo’s ages ago supporting T? on the suicide pact tour. all very rock n roll as far as i recall… :)

cool :D

Posted on Mon, 19 September 2005 at 18:33

#30

Bad Karma wrote:

I’ve Got the knives? wrote:

i know this is a bit of topic but the yo yo’s r supporting them any1 else like them.fucking quality.danny mccormack legend :D

Yeah they’re alright i have their album.

Posted on Mon, 19 September 2005 at 23:49

You’re viewing replies 1–30 of 35 by 11 people

·

Page: First | Previous | | Last

and become a member of the message boards. Sign in if you’re already a member.