#31
Fordonian wrote:
Are they buggered tour wise now Scotts gone back to rehab?
Posted on Mon, 12 July 2004 at 20:14
#32
Gav wrote:
Again?
Its a shame as the album has really grown on me
Posted on Mon, 12 July 2004 at 21:13
#33
Fordonian wrote:
Posted on Tue, 13 July 2004 at 16:53
#34
White Psycho wrote:
I just got this album off the net as I was curious about it. I can’t stand Guns n’ roses but this is pretty good, nothing life changing, just good to listen to.
Posted on Sun, 16 January 2005 at 00:44
#35
gapu wrote:
- - - - - - - - - - -
CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN?
- - - - - - - - - - -
why no one is complaining that the guitar sounds pretty much like stalk and slash by therapy??
other than vertigo by u2, everyone shoutet at them for that unforgiveable disaster.. but not velvet revolver? not that i want to protect u2 for all the things that youve said but its strange that no one is complaining about velvet revolvers slither
Posted on Sun, 16 January 2005 at 09:33
#36
White Psycho wrote:
Its similar but the progression goes in a different direction.
Posted on Mon, 17 January 2005 at 00:23
#37
Simon (Simon) wrote:
I don’t mind the album but i do think it’s to long if they had cut a few songs then maybe i wouldn’t skip a few when listening but i’m seeing them live next month so we shall see how they hold up in concert.
Posted on Mon, 17 January 2005 at 01:22
#38
Andy D wrote:
gapu wrote:
- - - - - - - - - - -
CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN?
- - - - - - - - - - -
why no one is complaining that the guitar sounds pretty much like stalk and slash by therapy??
other than vertigo by u2, everyone shoutet at them for that unforgiveable disaster.. but not velvet revolver? not that i want to protect u2 for all the things that youve said but its strange that no one is complaining about velvet revolvers slither
I noticed a song similar to T? but I still don’t know which song it is because the only time I listened to the album was in the car and due to traffic I couldn’t take the CD to hand to read the tracklisting but you’re right.
Posted on Tue, 18 January 2005 at 00:54
#39
White Psycho wrote:
Divers wrote:
I don’t mind the album but i do think it’s to long if they had cut a few songs then maybe i wouldn’t skip a few when listening but i’m seeing them live next month so we shall see how they hold up in concert.
My mate says it was one of the best gigs he’d ever been to.
Posted on Tue, 18 January 2005 at 02:46
#40
Simon (Simon) wrote:
Cool then I’m looking forward to it more. The girl I’m going with is trying to get us backstage passes I doubt that we will but I’m sure to post if it happens.
Posted on Tue, 18 January 2005 at 05:20
#41
motherh666 wrote:
Gapu.
I can see a little bit of a similarity. I think it was more the coincidence that U2 and T? stem from the same Island and that there is a bigger chance of them having heard Sister than Velvet Revolver having heard Stalk n Slash.
If you know what I mean…
Posted on Tue, 18 January 2005 at 08:47
#42
Preacher (Pete) wrote:
I was really disappointed with the Velvet Revolver album. Nothing worse than wasted (no pun intended) talent.
Posted on Sat, 22 January 2005 at 20:14
#43
Simon (Simon) wrote:
Only two weeks till I see them If i get to meet slash then Everyone i know will be getting a copy of the photo.
Posted on Tue, 8 February 2005 at 03:47
#44
Simon (Simon) wrote:
The concert was fucking great thats all i can say.
heres a photo of slash
(Before changing the message boards’ software in August 2007 this post had a file attachment, which may return in the future)
Posted on Thu, 24 February 2005 at 01:10
#45
RobbyVDH wrote:
Still a head with only hair it seems :D
Posted on Thu, 24 February 2005 at 17:30
#46
Simon (Simon) wrote:
He was looking quite well these days and hasn’t gone stupid skinny like the rest of them.
Posted on Fri, 25 February 2005 at 00:29
#47
realityfuck (Jar lath) wrote:
When I saw VR I thought they were class. Slash is a nutcase on stage, always moving, which was a surprise cos he’s so laid back in interviews.
A couple of my mates met him a year or two back and said he was sound, no pretentions, real friendly and just strollin around like an ordinary Joe Soap, not a bodyguard in sight.
Posted on Fri, 25 February 2005 at 01:42
#48
Simon (Simon) wrote:
I think thats a reason why no matter how fucked up GnR got you couldn’t help like Slash as he was harmless and didn’t slag people off. But as you said he was very mobile on stage and he seemed to do most of the between song banta at my gig which he never used to do.
Posted on Fri, 25 February 2005 at 04:43
#49
motherh666 wrote:
He was awesome on Never mind the buzzcocks a few years back. Nearly set himself on fire I seem to recall.
Posted on Fri, 25 February 2005 at 08:55
#50
Simon (Simon) wrote:
Fuck I must of missed that. I guess he’s more down to earth as he is not a yank.
Posted on Sat, 26 February 2005 at 03:37
#51
Squall wrote:
gapu wrote:
- - - - - - - - - - -
CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN?
- - - - - - - - - - -
why no one is complaining that the guitar sounds pretty much like stalk and slash by therapy??
Thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard :rolleyes:
Do people on this board do nothing but listen to songs that bear a slight resemblance to therapy? songs and come on here to complain ?
Nobody seems to mention that Therapy have riffs that are blatantly ripped off other bands.
Like the middle 8 from trigger inside is The Four Horsemen by Metallica…And dont get me started on Shameless…!!!!
Posted on Sat, 26 February 2005 at 20:35
