Wall of Mouths

so it’s been i while…but a quicky update…he left and we’ve been married almost a year… so sometimes good shit happens outta a bad situation… and now I’m a stepmum!!!!!!!!!!!!

Paddy wrote:

First of all Tartan, how ace are your photos?!?!? OMG! (thats got the pervy bit out the way).

I think Loose could be a good track.

Ah thanks, and love the Loose suggestion -was one I was considering, am going to have a lot of fun with this - just hope I can do whatever track I choose justice!!!! BTW if anyone is anywhere near Portsmouth next weekend I’ll be performing, and I’ll have my strawberry sauce all ready for squeezing!!!!

Oh it’s been so long since I have been on these hallowed walls…

I am a burlesque performer (http://www.myspace.com/tartanskirtgirl), and being a huge Therapy? fan really really want to do a routine to a Therapy? track - trouble is I love so many that I’m finding it hard to decide on one - so come on people what would YOU like to see me tease to… I can go pretty far with my acts and don’t mind getting messy, I’d love to come up with something to dedicate to all us Therapy? fans…

If you both genuinely like each other then you’ll get together and it would be the right thing for her to leave the other guy. What would be the alternative, she stays with the other guy and has an affair with you - at least if you managed to tempt her away she wouldn’t be cheating on the other chap. It’s not like you seem to be intentionally going out with the sole purpose to break up a relationship, you just happen to have fallen for someone that happens to be already attached - but maybe not for much longer hey. But then I would ay that wouldn’t I…;)

leaving his wife, yeah my life the soap opera…

It is now, as they say, now in the hands of the lawyers, he really is leaving…

thanks for the constructive advice…will prob stick to Cosmo next time!!

Title: Do men ever leave for the other woman?

Well do they - mine says he will - need some expert type advice and am fed up with Cosmo…

Have been watching this thread for as while, and really reassured at the majority opinion!! I’ve just sent my other half off to work, he’s a paramedic. He’d love to say that everyday he deals with people that are genuinly ill or injured through no fault of their own. he doesn’t he spends the best part of his working day mopping up the crap caused by drinking (be that drunk drivers that think they are alert enough to drive - you’re not booze is a chemical depressant, or usual binge drinking at the weekend). the sad thing is that it’s normally the drink driver f**kwit that gets off with the minor injury and the innocent victims that suffer. and all the time he’s dealing with these avoidable “accidents” there’s probably some poor old lady having a heart attack somewhere that he can’t get to cos he’s having to deal with the s**t caused by losers that think think they have the god given right to drive their cars whatever they’ve had to drink.

there rant over…

I recently had my car broken into, I’d just moved house so my car was pretty empty, all they took was a pair of sunglasses - quite pricey but prescription so no use to anyone. Anyway the police found a finger print on a wildhearts tape and now the guy that did it is in jail. The moral of the story - however trivial it seems tell the police and be saved by the detective powers of a rock n roll tape!!!

I don’t think that I’ll be watching it. This poor guy has a family, and I know that if someone had put footage of my Dad dying on the net I would have been appalled to think that anyone felt they had the right to see it. The final moments of anyone’s life are personal, and just because the footage is available to the world doesn’t mean the world has to access it. The manner in which he lost his life is undignified enough without the whole world thinking they have the right to peer at it. Maybe I’m mistaken and his family are happy with this being about - but I guess that the fact that they are declining to talk to the press would indicate otherwise.

We all have seen the stills on TV, and know what became of him. The fact that we know he was beheaded should be enough to sicken us all to the pits of our stomachs - we shouldn’t feel the need to watch the event too.

I just really don’t think that just because something is out there means we all have the right to look at it.

Hey we must have the same moving bug. I’m moving in a couple of weeks time. Am trying to be good and get stuff sorted prior but - this is where I beg for sympathy - I’ve got wisdom tooth ache (being pulled tomorrow - arghh), so at the moment my great de-junk plans are on hold.

The only thing I always do is the obvious labeling boxes as to which room they need to go in at the new place. Also give any helpers lots of tea on the day. Oh and don’t do what I did last move and wear a thong - just think of all the heavy boxes you’ll be bending over to pick up - ouch!!!!

The idea of re-using burial plots isn’t a new one. In many central European cities plots are only leased for 10 to 30 years after which time the remains are removed to make way for someone else. There’s a place in Mexico where, if the relatives don’t continue to pay a fee, the corpses are put in a kind of museum for mummified corpses. I think personally that we are far to reticent in discussing these kinds of issues until an article like the AOL one appears and then we get on our high horses about it. If we were a bit more comfortable with the whole subject of death in general, we might be able to take a more practical approach to where our remains end up.

gotta be China Drum’s version of Wuthering Heights!!!