Re: Saddam Hussein captured! in Chit-Chat
Originally posted by trigger:
—Which crimes are these?
how bout the killing of over 10,000 innocent iraqi civilians
for starters.
for using weapons technically banned under the geneva convention, cluster bombs, napalm and air burst bombs.
and maybe as they are leaders of the two largest exporters of weapons (mass destruction included) in the world, they should be held accountable.
bush as a texas governer who signed over 200 sentances of death, human rights me arse!
for sending people to their death in a sham war, under fake,false and invented reasonings. This surely would at least merit a trial for treason?
also most seriously, an estimated 50,000 civilians unnacounted for after the flattening of afghanistan. the forgotten victims.
and maybe guantanamo bay aswell.
Posted on Mon, 15 December 2003 at 22:50
Re: fuck blood and honour in Chit-Chat
I understand your motivations and concerns, but i dont believe in censorship whatsoever. Censorship and control of information and disinformation sometimes is a contributing factor of crazy movements like blood and honour.
still in sentiment i am sickened by swine like that, but i think let them speak their bullshit they will lose every argument in any case, in being banned they have a ‘moral victory’ in their eyes.
Posted on Mon, 15 December 2003 at 01:12
Re: Phil Collins in Chit-Chat
‘wastelife’.
2 years back one of the wastelife ‘group’ got beaten up outside ‘abrakababra’ a food poisioning outlet in sligo.
I hope that the person administering the beating likes therapy?!
Posted on Mon, 15 December 2003 at 01:05
Re: attention swedes… in Chit-Chat
get in touch with ‘sticky fingers’ rock club in gothenburg.
was there after halloween and it was pretty good all in all.
Course it would have been even better had therapy? not cancelled the gig after i had booked flights to go and see them there…aghhhhhhhh
ask the band ‘Mustasch’ if they will have you as a support!
Black city!!!:p
Posted on Mon, 15 December 2003 at 01:01
Re: Saddam Hussein captured! in Chit-Chat
whats the bets that saddam erm…’dies’ before he goes to trial…
Like someone mentioned, too much of a liability with all those friends in the UK and US who happily supplied him with W feckin MD to fight Iran and theri fear of a Islamic idealist middle east.
My guess is they captured a guy in a hole and realised it was saddam just after, if they knew it was him before they would have capped the fecker.
Agreed, i dont see any respite in attacks on the occupying US and UK forces. Bottom line, they shouldnt be there, unless there mandated by the UN and until they get out then they deserve what they get. Professional soldiers arnt brave, they’re just wasting their lifes for some capitalist/facist or some other greed driven moron. (UN peacekeepers being the exeption)
Hopefully, the whole debacle will finish all the dictators Hussein, Bush and Blair toppled and the world will drag itself out of the dark ages.
It should be an interesting ‘moral’ debate if saddam does go to trial and the death penalty is sentanced.
Iraq for the Iraqi’s and no blood for oil.
Posted on Mon, 15 December 2003 at 00:55