Re: aren’t tattoo’s brilliant!! in Chit-Chat
That sounds like an interesting one, Opal Mantra. I have two symbols in black, one on each upper arm.
Posted on Fri, 18 July 2008 at 17:34
Re: Stuff on the ‘Bay in Chit-Chat
Have you got any TopMan trousers? Colin’ll have them
Posted on Fri, 18 July 2008 at 16:09
Re: Stuff on the ‘Bay in Chit-Chat
Maybe he’s anorexic and needs a 28”
Posted on Fri, 18 July 2008 at 12:21
Re: Stuff on the ‘Bay in Chit-Chat
Fucking hell mate - I hope you’ve still got a pair of trousers left
Posted on Fri, 18 July 2008 at 11:27
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
I still rate Principle, they were quite exciting back then…even toured the UK with Emperor
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 16:54
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
Suprisingly not - though I do have a coffin shaped limited CoF CD somewhere…I’d better get limbering up as it seems I owe Jesus a few off the wrist
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 16:47
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
deadsetgav wrote:
Is that before they turned into a comedy band?
Yeah - Principle of Evil and Vempire era
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 16:45 in reply to an earlier post
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
I also had a CoF “stash box” which was a small container on a string you could put round your neck and wear under your clothes - for smuggling spliffs in
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 16:44
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
I liked the Filth when I was a lad…if I remember rightly I had a tshirt with a woman in a coffin
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 16:42
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
I wonder what the fine is in Australia for wearing the Cradle Of Filth “Jesus Is a Cunt” shirt…
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 16:36
Re: Vent your spleen! :mad: in Chit-Chat
I’d be interested to know what law you were breaking by wearing it
Posted on Wed, 16 July 2008 at 07:30
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
Personally I would opt my child out of school education and home educate…though the government would probably come and try and take your child ;)
Posted on Sun, 13 July 2008 at 21:13
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
This was a neatly alligned little grammar table when I posted it :(
mr self destruct wrote:
present simple past simple past participle
drive drove driven
Posted on Sun, 13 July 2008 at 21:08 in reply to an earlier post
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
The thing is - as a native speaker you probably weren’t taught this at school. I didn’t have a clue about any of it before I got a job teaching it as a foreign language (and I have a degree in English and half-trained as an English teacher)! Just have a look around the web for beginner grammar stuff. The BBC language section for example :)
Posted on Sun, 13 July 2008 at 21:07
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
Pluperfect must be French.
The third form of the verb is also known as the past participle or present prefect.
present simple past simple past participle
drive drove driven
Posted on Sun, 13 July 2008 at 20:56
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
Past perfect simple is had + 3rd form of the verb, PP Continuous is had been + verb+ing
Pluperfect - never heard of it. Doesn’t exist.
There are 3 conditionals, the ones above. Had there been more I would have shown you them (nice use of the 3rd just there) :)
Posted on Sun, 13 July 2008 at 20:39
Re: WOMble Fantasy Football League 08/09 in Chit-Chat
I think you could safely rule out winning any money…unless the WoMble team had quite a few substitutes :)
Posted on Fri, 11 July 2008 at 18:51
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
The latter:
1st conditional is for possible future events “If I win at pool tomorrow I’ll mock my opponent viciously.” (present simple + will)
2nd conditional is for hypothetical and impossible future events: “If I drank alcohol I would be as pissed as mrs h.” (past simple + would)
3rd conditional is for past hypothetical events: “If I hadn’t wanted to show off my grammar skills, I wouldn’t have bothered typing this reply:” (past perfect + would + present perfect)
€25 please :p
Posted on Fri, 11 July 2008 at 18:48
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
mrs h wrote:
What exactly is that tense, Sam? It’s a sort of weirdy past future conditional thing that I can’t figure out. And what does “pluperfect” mean?
“If it had been a penis, can you imagine the size it would have been when he was born?” would have sounded better, and that’s the 3rd conditional.
Trust you to spoil Gav and Jess’s good news thread with grammar questions :rolleyes:
Posted on Fri, 11 July 2008 at 10:06 in reply to an earlier post
Re: WOMble Fantasy Football League 08/09 in Chit-Chat
^ Forgot about him…I have 2 books of his collected Guardian writings
Posted on Fri, 11 July 2008 at 06:48
Re: WOMble Fantasy Football League 08/09 in Chit-Chat
Petridis is a good music reviewer as well
Posted on Thu, 10 July 2008 at 18:08
Re: WOMble Fantasy Football League 08/09 in Chit-Chat
I read their headlines…but mainly get news from alternative news sources.
Posted on Thu, 10 July 2008 at 17:54
Re: Whats the next gig you want to go to? in Chit-Chat
Off to see Down on Saturday, might shoot some film.
Posted on Thu, 10 July 2008 at 16:45
Re: David Icke stands in the David Davis byelection in Chit-Chat
Yeah - it’s the same with 9/11…which is more incredible, the offical story or the conspiracy theory? I know which one I think is more credible.
Posted on Thu, 10 July 2008 at 16:44
Re: This messageboard has a lot to answer for… in Chit-Chat
If it had been a penis, can you imagine the size of his old chap when he was born?!
Posted on Thu, 10 July 2008 at 16:42
Re: David Icke stands in the David Davis byelection in Chit-Chat
I said “stuff” far too many times there
Posted on Wed, 9 July 2008 at 21:17
Re: David Icke stands in the David Davis byelection in Chit-Chat
Yeah, he has damaged his credibility with the reptilian stuff (though to be fair the theory is way more complex than “the world is run by lizards”)! I still think, no matter how far out that particular theory is, it doesn’t invalidate the stuff he says which does ring true. If you are interested in this kind of stuff then check out Alex Jones - his stuff isn’t quite as wacky as David Icke’s.
Posted on Wed, 9 July 2008 at 21:16
Re: David Icke stands in the David Davis byelection in Chit-Chat
I don’t think the idea’s insane, but I guess you knew that :) I don’t mean only a few people, but I think it’s perfectly plausible that a collection of a few hundred people could be pulling the strings (of the Western world at least). Research the Bilderberg Group - a group of the world’s most powerful business and political leaders who meet in secret every year, with absolutely zero mainstream media coverage. They claim not implement policy but I find that very hard to believe…
Posted on Wed, 9 July 2008 at 20:43